Thursday Evening Pairs Thursday Eve Session August 21, 2014
Scores after  5 rounds  Average:   40.0      Section  A  North-South
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C
  4   63.13   50.50  A   1                0.81(A)  Brian HALEY - Kristin Rimal
  2   58.75   47.00  B   2                0.57(A)  Nancy Stetson - Judy Carico
  1   56.88   45.50  A                             Sally Jamison - Conrad Larkin
  3   16.25   13.00  C                             Gus Beckert - Margie Smith
  5   55.00   44.00  A  NE                         Kate Hill - Randy Randolph

Thursday Evening Pairs Thursday Eve Session August 21, 2014
Scores after  5 rounds  Average:   40.0      Section  A  East-West
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C
  5   59.38   47.50  A   1                0.81(A)  Phyllis Rader - Jock Rader
  1   56.25   45.00  A   2                0.57(A)  Robert Rottmayer - Kenneth Koutz
  4   50.00   40.00  A                             Jane Bender - Kathy Juarez
  3   42.50   34.00  C                             Enid Barnes - Rob Granshaw
  2   41.88   33.50  C                             Judy Sitzman - Doris Beckert



Board 1
North Deals
None Vul
A J 8
A 9
Q 10 6 5
8 6 4 3
K 9 6 5 2
K 8 3 2
9 4
A K
N
WE
S
Q 7
Q J 10 5
A 3 2
Q J 9 2
10 4 3
7 6 4
K J 8 7
10 7 5

EW 4; EW 3♠; EW 2N; EW 3♣; Par −420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠W−21004.000.001-Jamison-Larkin vs 1-Rottmayer-Koutz
3 NTE−1503.001.002-Stetson-Carico vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw
3 E41701.003.003-Beckert-Smith vs 5-Rader-Rader
2 NTE31502.002.004-HALEY-Rimal vs 2-Sitzman-Beckert
4 E54500.004.005-Hill-Randolph vs 4-Bender-Juarez

Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul
A 10 3 2
Q 6
8 6 5 4
10 8 3
K 9 7 5
9 8 7 5 3
A J
J 9
N
WE
S
Q 8
K 10 4 2
K 10 9 7 2
7 4
J 6 4
A J
Q 3
A K Q 6 5 2

NS 4♣; NS 2N; NS 2♠; EW 2; EW 1; Par +130

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 ♣S41303.001.001-Jamison-Larkin vs 1-Rottmayer-Koutz
3 ♣S31101.003.002-Stetson-Carico vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw
2 ♠N−22000.004.003-Beckert-Smith vs 5-Rader-Rader
3 ♣S51504.000.004-HALEY-Rimal vs 2-Sitzman-Beckert
1 NTS21202.002.005-Hill-Randolph vs 4-Bender-Juarez

Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul
A 3
A J
Q J 5 4
K 9 7 4 3
Q 9 7
K 9 8 6 4 2
K 2
6 2
N
WE
S
J 2
Q 10 7 5 3
A 10 8
Q 10 5
K 10 8 6 5 4
9 7 6 3
A J 8

NS 4♠; NS 4; NS 4♣; NS 2N; EW 2; Par +420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♠N−1500.004.001-Jamison-Larkin vs 1-Rottmayer-Koutz
4 ×W−25004.000.002-Stetson-Carico vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw
4 E−22001.003.003-Beckert-Smith vs 5-Rader-Rader
4 ♠S44202.501.504-HALEY-Rimal vs 2-Sitzman-Beckert
4 ♠N44202.501.505-Hill-Randolph vs 4-Bender-Juarez

Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul
J
K 10 9 8 4
J 7
J 8 6 4 2
A 9 4 3
Q 2
A 10 6 3
A Q 3
N
WE
S
Q 10 7 5 2
A 7 6
Q 8
K 7 5
K 8 6
J 5 3
K 9 5 4 2
10 9

EW 5N; EW 5♠; EW 3; W 3♣; E 2♣; EW 1; Par −660

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠W56501.003.001-Jamison-Larkin vs 1-Rottmayer-Koutz
4 ♠W56501.003.002-Stetson-Carico vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw
5 ♠W56501.003.003-Beckert-Smith vs 5-Rader-Rader
3 S−22004.000.004-HALEY-Rimal vs 2-Sitzman-Beckert
4 ♠W46203.001.005-Hill-Randolph vs 4-Bender-Juarez

Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul
10 4 3
A 4
K Q 3
A J 9 4 3
A K Q 7 6 5
K 7 3
J 8
6 2
N
WE
S
J 9 8 6 5 2
A 9 7 4
K 10 7
J 9 8 2
Q 10
10 6 5 2
Q 8 5

EW 3; EW 2♠; N 1N; N 2♣; N 1; S 1♣; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 E44200.503.501-Jamison-Larkin vs 5-Rader-Rader
3 E31402.501.502-Stetson-Carico vs 2-Sitzman-Beckert
4 E44200.503.503-Beckert-Smith vs 4-Bender-Juarez
3 E31402.501.504-HALEY-Rimal vs 1-Rottmayer-Koutz
1 NTN1904.000.005-Hill-Randolph vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw

Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul
A K 6 5 4
K
A K 8 3
A Q 4
J
10 7 5 4
10 9 6 2
K J 6 3
N
WE
S
10 8 2
A 9 8 3
Q 7 4
9 5 2
Q 9 7 3
Q J 6 2
J 5
10 8 7

NS 6♠; NS 5N; NS 3; NS 4; NS 3♣; Par +980

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠N64803.001.001-Jamison-Larkin vs 5-Rader-Rader
4 ♠N54501.003.002-Stetson-Carico vs 2-Sitzman-Beckert
2 ♠N62300.004.003-Beckert-Smith vs 4-Bender-Juarez
4 ♠N64803.001.004-HALEY-Rimal vs 1-Rottmayer-Koutz
4 ♠N64803.001.005-Hill-Randolph vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw

Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul
A J 4 2
J 10 6 3
Q 10 3
Q 2
K Q 9 3
A 9 5
K 9 4
K 9 5
N
WE
S
10
8 7 4 2
7 6 2
A J 8 7 4
8 7 6 5
K Q
A J 8 5
10 6 3

EW 2N; EW 3♣; EW 1; EW 1; Par −120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTW21202.002.001-Jamison-Larkin vs 5-Rader-Rader
2 NTW31500.004.002-Stetson-Carico vs 2-Sitzman-Beckert
1 NTW21202.002.003-Beckert-Smith vs 4-Bender-Juarez
1 NTW21202.002.004-HALEY-Rimal vs 1-Rottmayer-Koutz
1 NTW−11004.000.005-Hill-Randolph vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw

Board 8
West Deals
None Vul
5 4 3
6 5 3 2
Q 5
A K 6 5
K 6 2
A J
10 9 7 6 3
4 3 2
N
WE
S
A 9
Q 10 9 8
A K J 8 4
10 9
Q J 10 8 7
K 7 4
2
Q J 8 7

EW 3N; EW 5; EW 2; NS 1♠; Par −400

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 E51500.503.501-Jamison-Larkin vs 5-Rader-Rader
2 ♠S21104.000.002-Stetson-Carico vs 2-Sitzman-Beckert
3 E51500.503.503-Beckert-Smith vs 4-Bender-Juarez
4 E41302.002.004-HALEY-Rimal vs 1-Rottmayer-Koutz
3 ♠N−1503.001.005-Hill-Randolph vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw

Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul
9 8 3 2
Q 7
7 5
K 10 7 6 2
6 4
A 3
Q 10 8 6 3
A J 9 4
N
WE
S
A 10 5
J 10 4 2
A K J 4
8 5
K Q J 7
K 9 8 6 5
9 2
Q 3

EW 4; EW 2N; NS 2♠; W 1; EW 1♣; Par −130

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♠S31404.000.001-Jamison-Larkin vs 4-Bender-Juarez
3 E41301.003.002-Stetson-Carico vs 1-Rottmayer-Koutz
3 E51500.004.003-Beckert-Smith vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw
3 ♠S−21002.501.504-HALEY-Rimal vs 5-Rader-Rader
3 ♠S−21002.501.505-Hill-Randolph vs 2-Sitzman-Beckert

Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul
9 8 4
A Q 9
A K 9 7
K 9 3
K Q 3 2
J 7 3 2
10
Q 8 7 5
N
WE
S
J 5
8 5 4
Q 8 5 4
A 6 4 2
A 10 7 6
K 10 6
J 6 3 2
J 10

NS 3N; NS 3♠; NS 2; NS 3; NS 1♣; Par +600

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 NTN21201.003.001-Jamison-Larkin vs 4-Bender-Juarez
2 NTN31503.001.002-Stetson-Carico vs 1-Rottmayer-Koutz
2 NTN−11000.004.003-Beckert-Smith vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw
2 NTN31503.001.004-HALEY-Rimal vs 5-Rader-Rader
2 NTN31503.001.005-Hill-Randolph vs 2-Sitzman-Beckert

Board 11
South Deals
None Vul
K 8 4 3
Q J 9 4
A 3
Q 4 3
10 7
K
K 10 9 8 2
A J 9 7 5
N
WE
S
Q J 6 2
10 8 6 2
Q J 6 5
8
A 9 5
A 7 5 3
7 4
K 10 6 2

NS 3; NS 2♠; NS 1N; EW 2; NS 2♣; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 S21104.000.001-Jamison-Larkin vs 4-Bender-Juarez
1 S−1501.502.502-Stetson-Carico vs 1-Rottmayer-Koutz
2 W31100.004.003-Beckert-Smith vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw
2 NTS−1501.502.504-HALEY-Rimal vs 5-Rader-Rader
1 S1803.001.005-Hill-Randolph vs 2-Sitzman-Beckert

Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul
8 5 3
K 10 2
Q 8 6 4
7 6 4
A 10 7
J 7 6 5
J 5 2
A 8 2
N
WE
S
6 2
A Q 9 4 3
K 3
K Q 10 3
K Q J 9 4
8
A 10 9 7
J 9 5

EW 5; EW 4N; EW 4♣; EW 1♠; NS 1; Par −450

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 E54500.004.001-Jamison-Larkin vs 4-Bender-Juarez
3 E31404.000.002-Stetson-Carico vs 1-Rottmayer-Koutz
2 E52002.002.003-Beckert-Smith vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw
4 E44201.003.004-HALEY-Rimal vs 5-Rader-Rader
3 E41703.001.005-Hill-Randolph vs 2-Sitzman-Beckert

Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul
K Q 8 7
8 3 2
9 4
8 5 4 3
J 10 3 2
A Q J 4
K J 10 7
7
N
WE
S
A 5 4
10 9 7
5 2
A J 10 9 2
9 6
K 6 5
A Q 8 6 3
K Q 6

EW 3; EW 2N; EW 2♠; W 3♣; EW 2; E 2♣; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTS−22002.501.501-Jamison-Larkin vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw
2 NTW31504.000.002-Stetson-Carico vs 5-Rader-Rader
2 NTS−33000.503.503-Beckert-Smith vs 2-Sitzman-Beckert
2 NTS−22002.501.504-HALEY-Rimal vs 4-Bender-Juarez
2 NTS−33000.503.505-Hill-Randolph vs 1-Rottmayer-Koutz

Board 14
East Deals
None Vul
K 3 2
A 6 5 4
Q J 7
K 3 2
A J 10 8 7
K Q 3
8
A 7 6 5
N
WE
S
9 4
10 9 8 7 2
A 9 6
J 10 8
Q 6 5
J
K 10 5 4 3 2
Q 9 4

EW 4; EW 2♠; EW 1N; NS 2; EW 2♣; Par −420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 S31103.001.001-Jamison-Larkin vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw
2 S2901.003.002-Stetson-Carico vs 5-Rader-Rader
1 ♠W21100.004.003-Beckert-Smith vs 2-Sitzman-Beckert
2 S41304.000.004-HALEY-Rimal vs 4-Bender-Juarez
2 ♠W−21002.002.005-Hill-Randolph vs 1-Rottmayer-Koutz

Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul
A K J 10
K 9 7
Q 6 5
J 10 6
8 3
Q J 8 6 4 2
8 2
8 5 4
N
WE
S
9 7 5 2
A 5 3
K J 7 4
K 7
Q 6 4
10
A 10 9 3
A Q 9 3 2

N 5N; NS 5♠; S 4N; NS 5♣; NS 4; N 1; Par +660

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠N46201.003.001-Jamison-Larkin vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw
3 NTN56603.001.002-Stetson-Carico vs 5-Rader-Rader
2 ♠N21100.004.003-Beckert-Smith vs 2-Sitzman-Beckert
3 NTN56603.001.004-HALEY-Rimal vs 4-Bender-Juarez
3 NTN56603.001.005-Hill-Randolph vs 1-Rottmayer-Koutz

Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul
8 7 2
3 2
J 10 7 6 3
A 4 3
A K J 9
Q 10 9 8 5
K Q
K 5
N
WE
S
10 6 5 4 3
7 4
9 8 5 2
10 2
Q
A K J 6
A 4
Q J 9 8 7 6

NS 5♣; NS 2N; EW 2♠; NS 2; NS 1; Par +400

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♣S51504.000.001-Jamison-Larkin vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw
4 ♣S41302.501.502-Stetson-Carico vs 5-Rader-Rader
2 ♣S41302.501.503-Beckert-Smith vs 2-Sitzman-Beckert
5 ♣S−1500.503.504-HALEY-Rimal vs 4-Bender-Juarez
4 ♣S−1500.503.505-Hill-Randolph vs 1-Rottmayer-Koutz

Board 17
North Deals
None Vul
Q 3
8 4 3 2
A K 6 2
J 9 6
K 5
9 7
Q J 8 7 4 3
A 7 5
N
WE
S
J 9 6 4 2
K Q J 6
K 8 4 2
A 10 8 7
A 10 5
10 9 5
Q 10 3

S 1N; EW 2; EW 2♣; EW 1♠; EW 1; Par −90

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 E21102.002.001-Jamison-Larkin vs 2-Sitzman-Beckert
2 NTW−31504.000.002-Stetson-Carico vs 4-Bender-Juarez
2 NTE21200.503.503-Beckert-Smith vs 1-Rottmayer-Koutz
2 NTW21200.503.504-HALEY-Rimal vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw
2 NTW−21003.001.005-Hill-Randolph vs 5-Rader-Rader

Board 18
East Deals
N-S Vul
K J 9
9 6
K 9 7
9 7 6 5 3
A 7 6
10 8 7 4 3
A 6 4 2
8
N
WE
S
10 8 3 2
J 5 2
8 3
J 10 4 2
Q 5 4
A K Q
Q J 10 5
A K Q

NS 5N; NS 4♠; NS 5; NS 3; NS 4♣; Par +660

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTS56603.500.501-Jamison-Larkin vs 2-Sitzman-Beckert
3 NTS36001.502.502-Stetson-Carico vs 4-Bender-Juarez
3 NTS36001.502.503-Beckert-Smith vs 1-Rottmayer-Koutz
3 NTS56603.500.504-HALEY-Rimal vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw
4 NTS−22000.004.005-Hill-Randolph vs 5-Rader-Rader

Board 19
South Deals
E-W Vul
Q 7 3
Q J 7
10 9 8 4
K 7 4
K 8 4
10 9 3
A J 3
A Q 3 2
N
WE
S
A 10 2
A K 6 2
K 5 2
9 6 5
J 9 6 5
8 5 4
Q 7 6
J 10 8

EW 3N; EW 3; EW 2♠; EW 3; EW 3♣; Par −600

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 E−11003.500.501-Jamison-Larkin vs 2-Sitzman-Beckert
3 NTW36002.002.002-Stetson-Carico vs 4-Bender-Juarez
3 NTW56600.004.003-Beckert-Smith vs 1-Rottmayer-Koutz
3 NTW−11003.500.504-HALEY-Rimal vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw
3 NTW46301.003.005-Hill-Randolph vs 5-Rader-Rader

Board 20
West Deals
Both Vul
A Q 8 4 3 2
K J 10
10 7 3
7
10 9 7
A Q 9 8 2
A Q
Q 9 3
N
WE
S
J 6
7 6 3
8 5 2
A K 5 4 2
K 5
5 4
K J 9 6 4
J 10 8 6

S 3♠; W 3; N 2♠; E 2; NS 3; NS 1N; EW 2♣; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 ♠N31403.001.001-Jamison-Larkin vs 2-Sitzman-Beckert
2 ♠N31403.001.002-Stetson-Carico vs 4-Bender-Juarez
2 W21100.004.003-Beckert-Smith vs 1-Rottmayer-Koutz
3 ♠N31403.001.004-HALEY-Rimal vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw
4 W−11001.003.005-Hill-Randolph vs 5-Rader-Rader