Thursday Evening Pairs Thursday Eve Session July 10, 2014
Scores after  5 rounds  Average:   40.0      Section  A  North-South
Pair    Pct   Score  Rank   HNDCP   Total  Rank   MPs
  4   61.89   49.51   1     11.11   60.62   1    0.40     Conrad Larkin - Jan Conklin
  1   58.60   46.88   2      9.14   56.02   2    0.28     Ann Waterman - Nan Halberg
  3   42.66   34.13         13.98   48.11                 Raymond Bidwell - Nona Lucas
  2   40.63   32.50          9.27   41.77                 Kathy Juarez - Jane Bender
  5   45.84   36.67  NE      0.00   36.67                 Kate Hill - Randy Randolph

Thursday Evening Pairs Thursday Eve Session July 10, 2014
Scores after  5 rounds  Average:   40.0      Section  A  East-West
Pair    Pct   Score  Rank   HNDCP   Total  Rank   MPs
  3   53.45   42.76   2     17.80   60.56   1    0.28     Cathy Wagener - Enid Barnes
  4   60.00   48.00   1     12.18   60.18   2    0.40     Linda Thomason - Janice Gullarian
  2   43.26   34.61         20.74   55.35                 Judy Sitzman - Margie Smith
  5   48.53   38.82         15.10   53.92                 Patricia Lebeck - Barbara Norman
  1   44.38   35.50          6.59   42.09                 Karen Rice - Donna Soehrens



140710EEEE#1

Board 1
North Deals
None Vul
4
A K J 8 7 4 3
A 10 7
9 3
A K Q 6
10 9 5 2
A K 8 5 2
N
WE
S
9 8 5 2
6
J 9 6 5 4 2
Q J
J 10 7 3
Q
K Q 8 3
10 7 6 4

EW 3♠; S 2; EW 2♣; N 1; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTS−1500.004.001-Waterman-Halberg vs 1-Rice-Soehrens
3 N31402.002.002-Juarez-Bender vs 3-Wagener-Barnes
3 ×N35304.000.003-Bidwell-Lucas vs 5-Lebeck-Norman
3 N41703.001.004-Larkin-Conklin vs 2-Sitzman-Smith
4 ×W−11001.003.005-Hill-Randolph vs 4-Thomason-Gullarian

control 1


140710EEEE#1

Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul
Q 6 4
10 6
10 4 3
10 9 7 5 3
J 8 5
4 3
A K 6 5
A K Q J
N
WE
S
A 10 7 3 2
A Q 7 5 2
9 7
8
K 9
K J 9 8
Q J 8 2
6 4 2

EW 5N; E 5♠; W 4♠; EW 3; E 3; EW 3♣; W 2; Par −460

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6 ♠E−21003.500.501-Waterman-Halberg vs 1-Rice-Soehrens
3 NTE−1501.502.502-Juarez-Bender vs 3-Wagener-Barnes
3 NTW34000.004.003-Bidwell-Lucas vs 5-Lebeck-Norman
3 NTW−1501.502.504-Larkin-Conklin vs 2-Sitzman-Smith
6 ♠E−21003.500.505-Hill-Randolph vs 4-Thomason-Gullarian

control 2


140710EEEE#1

Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul
K J 9
A K Q 7 4
J 5
Q J 9
10 7 5 3
J 8 3
A 10 9 4
A 4
N
WE
S
8 4
10 6 5 2
K Q 7 6 2
10 2
A Q 6 2
9
8 3
K 8 7 6 5 3

NS 4♠; NS 3; NS 4♣; NS 1N; EW 1; Par +420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♣S61704.000.001-Waterman-Halberg vs 1-Rice-Soehrens
3 NTN−1501.003.002-Juarez-Bender vs 3-Wagener-Barnes
2 N31403.001.003-Bidwell-Lucas vs 5-Lebeck-Norman
2 NTN21202.002.004-Larkin-Conklin vs 2-Sitzman-Smith
6 ♣N−21000.004.005-Hill-Randolph vs 4-Thomason-Gullarian

control 3


140710EEEE#1

Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul
Q 10 9 2
J 5
6 5
A J 8 7 5
A K 7
A Q 9 4
K 9 8 3 2
4
N
WE
S
J 8 6 5 3
6 3
A Q J 7
Q 10
4
K 10 8 7 2
10 4
K 9 6 3 2

EW 4♠; EW 5; EW 2N; EW 1; NS 1♣; Par −620

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♠E41703.001.001-Waterman-Halberg vs 1-Rice-Soehrens
3 ♠E41703.001.002-Juarez-Bender vs 3-Wagener-Barnes
5 W56001.003.003-Bidwell-Lucas vs 5-Lebeck-Norman
3 ♠E41703.001.004-Larkin-Conklin vs 2-Sitzman-Smith
4 ♠E46200.004.005-Hill-Randolph vs 4-Thomason-Gullarian

control 4


140710EEEE#1

Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul
A 9 6 3
9 2
A K 7 4 3
7 5
Q 5
Q 7 6
Q 10 8 2
A J 10 8
N
WE
S
K J 10 8 4
A 10
J 9 6
9 6 3
7 2
K J 8 5 4 3
5
K Q 4 2

EW 2N; NS 2; EW 1♠; EW 1; EW 1♣; Par −120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTS−22001.003.001-Waterman-Halberg vs 5-Lebeck-Norman
3 S−11002.002.002-Juarez-Bender vs 2-Sitzman-Smith
2 S31403.500.503-Bidwell-Lucas vs 4-Thomason-Gullarian
3 S31403.500.504-Larkin-Conklin vs 1-Rice-Soehrens
3 N−33000.004.005-Hill-Randolph vs 3-Wagener-Barnes

control 5


140710EEEE#1

Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul
A
A K 10
Q 7 4 3
A K J 9 3
Q J 9 8
J 9 7 2
A 8 6 5
4
N
WE
S
10 7 5 2
8 5 4 3
J 10
6 5 2
K 6 4 3
Q 6
K 9 2
Q 10 8 7

NS 6N; NS 6♣; NS 5; NS 3♠; NS 2; Par +990

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6 ♣N69204.000.001-Waterman-Halberg vs 5-Lebeck-Norman
3 NTN44302.002.002-Juarez-Bender vs 2-Sitzman-Smith
2 ♣N61700.004.003-Bidwell-Lucas vs 4-Thomason-Gullarian
5 ♣N64201.003.004-Larkin-Conklin vs 1-Rice-Soehrens
3 NTN54603.001.005-Hill-Randolph vs 3-Wagener-Barnes

control 6


140710EEEE#1

Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul
10 3
A Q 10 9 5 4
K 8 2
7 5
J 8 2
7
Q 7 6 4 3
10 9 8 4
N
WE
S
A K Q 6 4
K 6 3 2
A 10 5
6
9 7 5
J 8
J 9
A K Q J 3 2

EW 3♠; EW 3; NS 1N; NS 1; NS 1♣; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 N41703.001.001-Waterman-Halberg vs 5-Lebeck-Norman
4 N−11001.003.002-Juarez-Bender vs 2-Sitzman-Smith
3 ♠E−11002.002.003-Bidwell-Lucas vs 4-Thomason-Gullarian
4 ×N47904.000.004-Larkin-Conklin vs 1-Rice-Soehrens
4 ♣S−22000.004.005-Hill-Randolph vs 3-Wagener-Barnes

control 7


140710EEEE#1

Board 8
West Deals
None Vul
J 6 5
K 6 5 2
7
A Q J 10 7
9 7 4 2
A Q 10 3
A K 3 2
5
N
WE
S
K 8 3
J 8 7
Q 9 8 5
9 8 4
A Q 10
9 4
J 10 6 4
K 6 3 2

NS 3N; NS 5♣; NS 1♠; NS 1; EW 1; Par +400

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 E−31502.002.001-Waterman-Halberg vs 5-Lebeck-Norman
3 ♠W−31502.002.002-Juarez-Bender vs 2-Sitzman-Smith
3 ♣S31100.004.003-Bidwell-Lucas vs 4-Thomason-Gullarian
4 E−31502.002.004-Larkin-Conklin vs 1-Rice-Soehrens
3 NTN44304.000.005-Hill-Randolph vs 3-Wagener-Barnes

control 8


140710EEEE#1

Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul
10 8 6
9 2
K 8 3
A K Q 9 6
A Q J 7
J 10 7 5 3
A 10 7
5
N
WE
S
K 9 4
K Q 8 6 4
9 6 4
3 2
5 3 2
A
Q J 5 2
J 10 8 7 4

EW 3; EW 2♠; NS 3♣; NS 2; Par −100: NS 4♣×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 E−11003.001.001-Waterman-Halberg vs 4-Thomason-Gullarian
3 ♣N41304.000.002-Juarez-Bender vs 1-Rice-Soehrens
5 ♣N−21001.003.003-Bidwell-Lucas vs 3-Wagener-Barnes
4 ♣N−1502.002.004-Larkin-Conklin vs 5-Lebeck-Norman
4 ×E59900.004.005-Hill-Randolph vs 2-Sitzman-Smith

control 9


140710EEEE#1

Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul
8
K 10 8 2
A Q J 9 2
A K 3
A 10 3
Q J 6
10 7 6
10 9 8 5
N
WE
S
K J 7 6 4
A 9 4
5 4 3
J 2
Q 9 5 2
7 5 3
K 8
Q 7 6 4

NS 2N; NS 2; NS 3; NS 2♣; Par +120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTN46304.000.001-Waterman-Halberg vs 4-Thomason-Gullarian
2 N21101.003.002-Juarez-Bender vs 1-Rice-Soehrens
2 ♠E−11000.004.003-Bidwell-Lucas vs 3-Wagener-Barnes
2 N31402.002.004-Larkin-Conklin vs 5-Lebeck-Norman
2 N51503.001.005-Hill-Randolph vs 2-Sitzman-Smith

control 10


140710EEEE#1

Board 11
South Deals
None Vul
J 10 7 5
A Q J 10 9
K Q 5
K
A K 9 4 3
7 4
A 9 7 2
8 6
N
WE
S
8 2
K 6 5 2
J 8 6 4
J 5 4
Q 6
8 3
10 3
A Q 10 9 7 3 2

NS 2N; NS 2; NS 3♣; NS 1♠; EW 1; Par +120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 ♣S−1501.003.001-Waterman-Halberg vs 4-Thomason-Gullarian
3 NTN−1501.003.002-Juarez-Bender vs 1-Rice-Soehrens
3 ♣S−1501.003.003-Bidwell-Lucas vs 3-Wagener-Barnes
3 NTN34003.500.504-Larkin-Conklin vs 5-Lebeck-Norman
3 NTN34003.500.505-Hill-Randolph vs 2-Sitzman-Smith

control 11


140710EEEE#1

Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul
A K 7 6 5 4
7 6
A J 7 6 2
Q 9 2
J 8 4 3
J 8 5 4 3
9
N
WE
S
J
K Q 7 6 5 2
A K 2
10 8 3
10 8 3
A 10 9
Q 10 9
K Q 5 4

NS 4♠; EW 3; NS 4♣; NS 2N; W 2; E 1; Par +300: EW 5×−2

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠N56503.250.751-Waterman-Halberg vs 4-Thomason-Gullarian
4 ♠N56503.250.752-Juarez-Bender vs 1-Rice-Soehrens
4 ♠N46201.382.633-Bidwell-Lucas vs 3-Wagener-Barnes
5 ♠N−11000.133.884-Larkin-Conklin vs 5-Lebeck-Norman

control 12


140710EEEE#1

Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul
J 7 6 5 3
A
5 3 2
A Q 7 2
Q 4
Q 9 8 3
A 9 7 6
8 6 3
N
WE
S
K 7 6 5
Q J 8
K J 10 9 5 4
A K 10 9 8 2
J 10 4 2
K 10 4

NS 5♠; NS 2N; EW 2; EW 2♣; Par +650

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠S56501.502.501-Waterman-Halberg vs 3-Wagener-Barnes
4 ♠S56501.502.502-Juarez-Bender vs 5-Lebeck-Norman
4 ♠S56501.502.503-Bidwell-Lucas vs 2-Sitzman-Smith
4 ♠S56501.502.504-Larkin-Conklin vs 4-Thomason-Gullarian
4 ♠N66804.000.005-Hill-Randolph vs 1-Rice-Soehrens

control 13


140710EEEE#1

Board 14
East Deals
None Vul
9 5
A 9
K 10 9 6 3
Q J 10 4
A 7 4 3 2
Q J 10 5
Q J
6 3
N
WE
S
K J 10 8 6
8 7 6 3 2
8 4 2
Q
K 4
A 7 5
A K 9 8 7 5 2

NS 6♣; N 5; EW 3♠; S 4; NS 2N; EW 2; Par +500: EW 6♠×−3

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♣S71902.501.501-Waterman-Halberg vs 3-Wagener-Barnes
3 ♣S71902.501.502-Juarez-Bender vs 5-Lebeck-Norman
5 ♣S64204.000.003-Bidwell-Lucas vs 2-Sitzman-Smith
3 ♣S61700.503.504-Larkin-Conklin vs 4-Thomason-Gullarian
3 ♣S61700.503.505-Hill-Randolph vs 1-Rice-Soehrens

control 14


140710EEEE#1

Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul
10 9 5
Q J 2
A 8
Q J 9 5 4
A Q 6 4 3 2
10 9 3
9 7
A 8
N
WE
S
J
8 7 6 5
Q J 3 2
K 10 7 3
K 8 7
A K 4
K 10 6 5 4
6 2

NS 1; NS 1; NS 1♣; Par +80

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 S2902.002.001-Waterman-Halberg vs 3-Wagener-Barnes
3 NTS−33000.004.002-Juarez-Bender vs 5-Lebeck-Norman
2 ♠W−21003.001.003-Bidwell-Lucas vs 2-Sitzman-Smith
2 NTS21204.000.004-Larkin-Conklin vs 4-Thomason-Gullarian
2 NTN−22001.003.005-Hill-Randolph vs 1-Rice-Soehrens

control 15


140710EEEE#1

Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul
6
K J 6
A K Q J 10 7
K 4 3
K 3 2
8 7 4 2
5
A Q 7 5 2
N
WE
S
Q J 9 8 5 4
A 10 9 5
3
10 8
A 10 7
Q 3
9 8 6 4 2
J 9 6

NS 5; EW 2♠; NS 1N; EW 1; Par +400

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 N−1500.004.001-Waterman-Halberg vs 3-Wagener-Barnes
5 N54002.501.502-Juarez-Bender vs 5-Lebeck-Norman
5 N54002.501.503-Bidwell-Lucas vs 2-Sitzman-Smith
5 N54002.501.504-Larkin-Conklin vs 4-Thomason-Gullarian
3 NTN34002.501.505-Hill-Randolph vs 1-Rice-Soehrens

control 16


140710EEEE#1

Board 17
North Deals
None Vul
A 9 4 2
10 7 6 2
A Q J
9 8
J 7 3
A
K 8 5 4
K Q 10 6 2
N
WE
S
K 6 5
J 4 3
9 7 6 3 2
7 5
Q 10 8
K Q 9 8 5
10
A J 4 3

NS 3N; NS 3♠; NS 3; EW 1; NS 1♣; Par +400

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S−1500.503.501-Waterman-Halberg vs 2-Sitzman-Smith
3 S−1500.503.502-Juarez-Bender vs 4-Thomason-Gullarian
1 S21102.002.003-Bidwell-Lucas vs 1-Rice-Soehrens
4 S44203.500.504-Larkin-Conklin vs 3-Wagener-Barnes
4 N44203.500.505-Hill-Randolph vs 5-Lebeck-Norman

control 17


140710EEEE#1

Board 18
East Deals
N-S Vul
9 7 4 3
K 10 5 4 2
A 4
J 9
A 8
Q 8 7
9 6
A K 8 7 5 4
N
WE
S
Q J 10 6
K Q 8 7 5 3
Q 6 2
K 5 2
A J 9 6 3
J 10 2
10 3

EW 6; EW 6♣; S 2; EW 1N; EW 1♠; N 1; Par −920

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 NTW21204.000.001-Waterman-Halberg vs 2-Sitzman-Smith
2 ♣W61701.003.002-Juarez-Bender vs 4-Thomason-Gullarian
2 E41302.501.503-Bidwell-Lucas vs 1-Rice-Soehrens
2 E41302.501.504-Larkin-Conklin vs 3-Wagener-Barnes
5 ♣W54000.004.005-Hill-Randolph vs 5-Lebeck-Norman

control 18


140710EEEE#1

Board 19
South Deals
E-W Vul
9 8 2
10 6 4
A Q
Q 9 8 6 3
K 10 3
A J 9
9 8 6 4 3
10 2
N
WE
S
Q 7 6 5 4
Q 8
K J 2
K 5 4
A J
K 7 5 3 2
10 7 5
A J 7

EW 2♠; NS 2; E 3; E 1N; W 2; NS 1♣; Par −100: NS 3×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♠W−11002.002.001-Waterman-Halberg vs 2-Sitzman-Smith
2 ♠E31400.004.002-Juarez-Bender vs 4-Thomason-Gullarian
2 S−1501.003.003-Bidwell-Lucas vs 1-Rice-Soehrens
2 S21103.500.504-Larkin-Conklin vs 3-Wagener-Barnes
2 S21103.500.505-Hill-Randolph vs 5-Lebeck-Norman

control 19


140710EEEE#1

Board 20
West Deals
Both Vul
10 8 3
6 3 2
A J 8 6 3
10 4
A 7 4
A K 7 5
Q 9 7
Q J 3
N
WE
S
K Q J 6 2
10
A K 9 8 7 6 5
9 5
Q J 10 9 8 4
K 5 4 2
2

EW 6♠; EW 6♣; EW 2N; NS 1; NS 1; Par −1430

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠W56502.631.381-Waterman-Halberg vs 2-Sitzman-Smith
6 ♠W614300.753.252-Juarez-Bender vs 4-Thomason-Gullarian
6 ♠W614300.753.253-Bidwell-Lucas vs 1-Rice-Soehrens
4 ♣E71903.880.134-Larkin-Conklin vs 3-Wagener-Barnes

control 20


140710EEEE#1

control 21


140710EEEE#1

control 22


140710EEEE#1

control 23


140710EEEE#1

control 24


140710EEEE#1

control 25


140710EEEE#1

control 26


140710EEEE#1

control 27