Thursday Evening Pairs Thursday Eve Session June 19, 2014 Scores after 5 rounds Average: 40.0 Section A North-South Pair Pct Score Rank HNDCP Total Rank MPs 4 55.26 44.21 1 11.04 55.25 1 0.40 Conrad Larkin - Jan Conklin 5 51.10 40.88 10.72 51.60 2 0.14 Nan Halberg - Nancy Stetson 2 52.19 41.75 2 9.67 51.42 0.28 Brian HALEY - Kristin Rimal 1 44.06 35.25 13.10 48.35 Mary Lyons - Ann Waterman 3 47.66 38.13 8.10 46.23 Jane Bender - Kathy Juarez Thursday Evening Pairs Thursday Eve Session June 19, 2014 Scores after 5 rounds Average: 40.0 Section A East-West Pair Pct Score Rank HNDCP Total Rank MPs 4 58.60 46.88 1 12.94 59.82 1 0.40 John Richardson - Michael Aberle 3 52.66 42.13 2 13.84 55.97 2 0.28 Pam Schrock - Enid Barnes 2 48.44 38.75 17.13 55.88 Patricia Lebeck - Charlene Stone 5 39.06 31.25 9.35 40.60 Gordon Larsen - Doris Goodwin 1 51.31 41.05 NE 0.00 41.05 Kate Hill - Randy Randolph
Board 1 North Deals None Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 3♠; E 2♦; E 2♣; NS 1♥; W 1♦; W 1♣; Par +140
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
3 ♦ | E | −1 | 50 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1-Lyons-Waterman vs 1-Hill-Randolph | ||
3 ♦ | E | 3 | 110 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 2-HALEY-Rimal vs 3-Schrock-Barnes | ||
2 ♠ | S | 3 | 140 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 3-Bender-Juarez vs 5-Larsen-Goodwin | ||
4 ♠ | S | −1 | 50 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 4-Larkin-Conklin vs 2-Lebeck-Stone | ||
1 ♠ | S | 3 | 140 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 5-Halberg-Stetson vs 4-Richardson-Aberle |
control 1
Board 2 East Deals N-S Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EW 7N; EW 7♥; EW 7♦; EW 2♠; EW 1♣; Par −1520
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
5 ♦ | E | 7 | 440 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 1-Lyons-Waterman vs 1-Hill-Randolph | ||
5 ♦ | E | 7 | 440 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 2-HALEY-Rimal vs 3-Schrock-Barnes | ||
4 ♥ | W | 6 | 480 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 3-Bender-Juarez vs 5-Larsen-Goodwin | ||
3 NT | W | 5 | 460 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 4-Larkin-Conklin vs 2-Lebeck-Stone | ||
3 NT | W | 5 | 460 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 5-Halberg-Stetson vs 4-Richardson-Aberle |
control 2
Board 3 South Deals E-W Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 4♠; NS 4♣; NS 1N; NS 2♦; EW 1♥; Par +420
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
3 ♠ | N | 5 | 200 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 1-Lyons-Waterman vs 1-Hill-Randolph | ||
4 ♠ | N | 4 | 420 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2-HALEY-Rimal vs 3-Schrock-Barnes | ||
3 ♠ | N | 3 | 140 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 3-Bender-Juarez vs 5-Larsen-Goodwin | ||
4 ♠ | N | 6 | 480 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 4-Larkin-Conklin vs 2-Lebeck-Stone | ||
4 ♠ | N | 5 | 450 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 5-Halberg-Stetson vs 4-Richardson-Aberle |
control 3
Board 4 West Deals Both Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 5♠; NS 5♥; NS 4♦; NS 1N; EW 2♣; Par +650
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
4 ♥ | N | −2 | 200 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 1-Lyons-Waterman vs 1-Hill-Randolph | ||
4 ♥ | N | 6 | 680 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 2-HALEY-Rimal vs 3-Schrock-Barnes | ||
4 ♥ | N | 4 | 620 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 3-Bender-Juarez vs 5-Larsen-Goodwin | ||
4 ♠ | S | −2 | 200 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 4-Larkin-Conklin vs 2-Lebeck-Stone | ||
5 ♦ | N | −3 | 300 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 5-Halberg-Stetson vs 4-Richardson-Aberle |
control 4
Board 5 North Deals N-S Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 3N; NS 3♠; NS 3♥; NS 2♦; NS 1♣; Par +600
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
3 NT | S | 4 | 630 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 1-Lyons-Waterman vs 5-Larsen-Goodwin | ||
3 NT | N | 3 | 600 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 2-HALEY-Rimal vs 2-Lebeck-Stone | ||
2 NT | N | 3 | 150 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 3-Bender-Juarez vs 4-Richardson-Aberle | ||
3 NT | N | −2 | 200 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 4-Larkin-Conklin vs 1-Hill-Randolph | ||
2 NT | N | 4 | 180 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 5-Halberg-Stetson vs 3-Schrock-Barnes |
control 5
Board 6 East Deals E-W Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
N 1N; EW 1N; W 2♦; N 1♠; W 1♠; W 1♥; E 1♦; W 1♣; Par −90
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
3 ♦ | N | −3 | 150 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 1-Lyons-Waterman vs 5-Larsen-Goodwin | ||
2 ♠ | E | −2 | 200 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 2-HALEY-Rimal vs 2-Lebeck-Stone | ||
2 ♥ | W | 2 | 110 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 3-Bender-Juarez vs 4-Richardson-Aberle | ||
2 ♥ | W | −1 | 100 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 4-Larkin-Conklin vs 1-Hill-Randolph | ||
3 ♠ | E | −2 | 200 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 5-Halberg-Stetson vs 3-Schrock-Barnes |
control 6
Board 7 South Deals Both Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EW 5♥; EW 3N; EW 4♣; EW 2♠; EW 2♦; Par −650
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
2 ♥ | W | 3 | 140 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 1-Lyons-Waterman vs 5-Larsen-Goodwin | ||
2 ♥ | E | 5 | 200 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 2-HALEY-Rimal vs 2-Lebeck-Stone | ||
3 NT | W | 3 | 600 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 3-Bender-Juarez vs 4-Richardson-Aberle | ||
3 NT | E | 4 | 630 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 4-Larkin-Conklin vs 1-Hill-Randolph | ||
4 ♥ | W | 5 | 650 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 5-Halberg-Stetson vs 3-Schrock-Barnes |
control 7
Board 8 West Deals None Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EW 3♠; NS 3♣; NS 1N; NS 1♥; NS 1♦; Par −100: NS 4♣×−1
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
4 ♠× | E | −1 | 100 | 3.25 | 0.75 | 1-Lyons-Waterman vs 5-Larsen-Goodwin | ||
4 ♠ | E | −2 | 100 | 3.25 | 0.75 | 2-HALEY-Rimal vs 2-Lebeck-Stone | ||
2 ♠ | E | 3 | 140 | 0.13 | 3.88 | 3-Bender-Juarez vs 4-Richardson-Aberle | ||
4 ♠ | W | −1 | 50 | 1.38 | 2.63 | 5-Halberg-Stetson vs 3-Schrock-Barnes |
control 8
Board 9 North Deals E-W Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
S 6♦; S 5N; NS 5♥; N 5♦; N 2N; S 3♣; N 2♣; EW 1♠; Par +920
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
4 ♥ | S | −3 | 150 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 1-Lyons-Waterman vs 4-Richardson-Aberle | ||
3 NT | N | −2 | 100 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 2-HALEY-Rimal vs 1-Hill-Randolph | ||
3 NT | S | −1 | 50 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 3-Bender-Juarez vs 3-Schrock-Barnes | ||
3 ♦ | N | 6 | 170 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 4-Larkin-Conklin vs 5-Larsen-Goodwin | ||
3 NT | N | −2 | 100 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 5-Halberg-Stetson vs 2-Lebeck-Stone |
control 9
Board 10 East Deals Both Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EW 6♠; EW 6♦; EW 6♣; NS 2♥; Par −1400: NS 7♥×−5
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
4 ♠ | W | 6 | 680 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 1-Lyons-Waterman vs 4-Richardson-Aberle | ||
4 ♠ | W | 5 | 650 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 2-HALEY-Rimal vs 1-Hill-Randolph | ||
5 ♦ | E | 6 | 620 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 3-Bender-Juarez vs 3-Schrock-Barnes | ||
5 ♠ | W | −1 | 100 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 4-Larkin-Conklin vs 5-Larsen-Goodwin | ||
3 ♠ | W | 6 | 230 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 5-Halberg-Stetson vs 2-Lebeck-Stone |
control 10
Board 11 South Deals None Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EW 7N; EW 7♦; EW 7♣; EW 6♠; EW 4♥; Par −1520
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
6 NT | W | 7 | 1020 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 1-Lyons-Waterman vs 4-Richardson-Aberle | ||
6 ♦ | E | 7 | 940 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 2-HALEY-Rimal vs 1-Hill-Randolph | ||
6 NT | W | 7 | 1020 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 3-Bender-Juarez vs 3-Schrock-Barnes | ||
3 NT | W | 5 | 460 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 4-Larkin-Conklin vs 5-Larsen-Goodwin | ||
6 NT | W | 7 | 1020 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 5-Halberg-Stetson vs 2-Lebeck-Stone |
control 11
Board 12 West Deals N-S Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EW 5♠; EW 4N; EW 5♣; NS 1♥; EW 1♦; Par −450
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
3 ♠ | E | 5 | 200 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 1-Lyons-Waterman vs 4-Richardson-Aberle | ||
4 ♠ | W | 5 | 450 | 0.50 | 3.50 | 2-HALEY-Rimal vs 1-Hill-Randolph | ||
3 ♠ | W | 4 | 170 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 3-Bender-Juarez vs 3-Schrock-Barnes | ||
4 ♠ | W | 4 | 420 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 4-Larkin-Conklin vs 5-Larsen-Goodwin | ||
4 ♠ | E | 5 | 450 | 0.50 | 3.50 | 5-Halberg-Stetson vs 2-Lebeck-Stone |
control 12
Board 13 North Deals Both Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EW 3♠; EW 3♥; NS 3♣; NS 1♦; Par −140
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
2 ♥ | E | 3 | 140 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 1-Lyons-Waterman vs 3-Schrock-Barnes | ||
2 ♠ | E | 4 | 170 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 2-HALEY-Rimal vs 5-Larsen-Goodwin | ||
3 ♣ | N | 3 | 110 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 3-Bender-Juarez vs 2-Lebeck-Stone | ||
1 NT | E | −2 | 200 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 4-Larkin-Conklin vs 4-Richardson-Aberle | ||
4 ♠ | E | −1 | 100 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 5-Halberg-Stetson vs 1-Hill-Randolph |
control 13
Board 14 East Deals None Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 4♠; N 3N; S 5♣; NS 3♥; N 4♣; S 2N; NS 3♦; Par +420
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
4 ♠ | N | 5 | 450 | 2.50 | 1.50 | 1-Lyons-Waterman vs 3-Schrock-Barnes | ||
3 NT | N | 3 | 400 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 2-HALEY-Rimal vs 5-Larsen-Goodwin | ||
3 NT | S | 4 | 430 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 3-Bender-Juarez vs 2-Lebeck-Stone | ||
4 ♠ | N | 5 | 450 | 2.50 | 1.50 | 4-Larkin-Conklin vs 4-Richardson-Aberle | ||
3 NT | S | 6 | 490 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 5-Halberg-Stetson vs 1-Hill-Randolph |
control 14
Board 15 South Deals N-S Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
W 2♥; EW 1N; NS 2♦; EW 2♣; NS 1♠; E 1♥; Par −110
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
2 ♣ | S | −2 | 200 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 1-Lyons-Waterman vs 3-Schrock-Barnes | ||
1 ♥ | E | −1 | 50 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 2-HALEY-Rimal vs 5-Larsen-Goodwin | ||
2 ♦ | N | −1 | 100 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 3-Bender-Juarez vs 2-Lebeck-Stone | ||
2 ♦ | N | 2 | 90 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 4-Larkin-Conklin vs 4-Richardson-Aberle | ||
2 NT | E | 4 | 180 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 5-Halberg-Stetson vs 1-Hill-Randolph |
control 15
Board 16 West Deals E-W Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 5N; NS 5♠; NS 4♦; NS 4♣; NS 2♥; Par +460
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
1 ♦ | N | 2 | 90 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 1-Lyons-Waterman vs 3-Schrock-Barnes | ||
3 NT | S | 3 | 400 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 2-HALEY-Rimal vs 5-Larsen-Goodwin | ||
1 NT | N | 1 | 90 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 3-Bender-Juarez vs 2-Lebeck-Stone | ||
3 NT | N | −2 | 100 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 4-Larkin-Conklin vs 4-Richardson-Aberle | ||
1 NT | N | 2 | 120 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 5-Halberg-Stetson vs 1-Hill-Randolph |
control 16
Board 17 North Deals None Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 5♦; NS 2N; NS 2♠; NS 1♥; EW 1♣; Par +400
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
3 ♦ | N | 5 | 150 | 0.50 | 3.50 | 1-Lyons-Waterman vs 2-Lebeck-Stone | ||
3 NT | S | 4 | 430 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 2-HALEY-Rimal vs 4-Richardson-Aberle | ||
5 ♦× | N | 5 | 550 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 3-Bender-Juarez vs 1-Hill-Randolph | ||
2 ♦ | N | 5 | 150 | 0.50 | 3.50 | 4-Larkin-Conklin vs 3-Schrock-Barnes | ||
5 ♦ | N | 5 | 400 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 5-Halberg-Stetson vs 5-Larsen-Goodwin |
control 17
Board 18 East Deals N-S Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 3♥; NS 3♣; NS 1N; NS 2♦; W 1♠; Par +140
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
2 ♥ | E | −1 | 50 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 1-Lyons-Waterman vs 2-Lebeck-Stone | ||
1 NT | W | 2 | 120 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 2-HALEY-Rimal vs 4-Richardson-Aberle | ||
1 ♥ | E | 1 | 80 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 3-Bender-Juarez vs 1-Hill-Randolph | ||
2 ♦ | W | 2 | 90 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 4-Larkin-Conklin vs 3-Schrock-Barnes | ||
1 ♥ | E | 3 | 140 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 5-Halberg-Stetson vs 5-Larsen-Goodwin |
control 18
Board 19 South Deals E-W Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EW 3N; EW 3♥; EW 2♠; EW 3♦; NS 1♣; Par −500: NS 4♣×−3
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
4 ♣ | S | −1 | 50 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 1-Lyons-Waterman vs 2-Lebeck-Stone | ||
3 ♥ | W | 4 | 170 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 2-HALEY-Rimal vs 4-Richardson-Aberle | ||
4 ♥ | W | −1 | 100 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 3-Bender-Juarez vs 1-Hill-Randolph | ||
5 ♣ | S | −1 | 50 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 4-Larkin-Conklin vs 3-Schrock-Barnes | ||
5 ♥ | W | −2 | 200 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 5-Halberg-Stetson vs 5-Larsen-Goodwin |
control 19
Board 20 West Deals Both Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EW 6N; EW 6♠; EW 6♣; EW 5♥; EW 5♦; Par −1440
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
6 ♣ | W | 6 | 1370 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 1-Lyons-Waterman vs 2-Lebeck-Stone | ||
3 NT | W | 6 | 690 | 2.50 | 1.50 | 2-HALEY-Rimal vs 4-Richardson-Aberle | ||
6 NT | W | 7 | 1470 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 3-Bender-Juarez vs 1-Hill-Randolph | ||
4 NT | W | 6 | 690 | 2.50 | 1.50 | 4-Larkin-Conklin vs 3-Schrock-Barnes | ||
3 NT | W | 5 | 660 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 5-Halberg-Stetson vs 5-Larsen-Goodwin |
control 20
control 21
control 22
control 23
control 24