Thursday Evening Pairs Thursday Eve Session June 19, 2014
Scores after  5 rounds  Average:   40.0      Section  A  North-South
Pair    Pct   Score  Rank   HNDCP   Total  Rank   MPs
  4   55.26   44.21   1     11.04   55.25   1    0.40     Conrad Larkin - Jan Conklin
  5   51.10   40.88         10.72   51.60   2    0.14     Nan Halberg - Nancy Stetson
  2   52.19   41.75   2      9.67   51.42        0.28     Brian HALEY - Kristin Rimal
  1   44.06   35.25         13.10   48.35                 Mary Lyons - Ann Waterman
  3   47.66   38.13          8.10   46.23                 Jane Bender - Kathy Juarez

Thursday Evening Pairs Thursday Eve Session June 19, 2014
Scores after  5 rounds  Average:   40.0      Section  A  East-West
Pair    Pct   Score  Rank   HNDCP   Total  Rank   MPs
  4   58.60   46.88   1     12.94   59.82   1    0.40     John Richardson - Michael Aberle
  3   52.66   42.13   2     13.84   55.97   2    0.28     Pam Schrock - Enid Barnes
  2   48.44   38.75         17.13   55.88                 Patricia Lebeck - Charlene Stone
  5   39.06   31.25          9.35   40.60                 Gordon Larsen - Doris Goodwin
  1   51.31   41.05  NE      0.00   41.05                 Kate Hill - Randy Randolph



140619EEE#1

Board 1
North Deals
None Vul
J 9 5
8 7 4
9 4
A 10 7 6 4
Q 8 2
9 5 3 2
J
J 9 8 5 3
N
WE
S
4 3
A J
A Q 10 8 6 5
K Q 2
A K 10 7 6
K Q 10 6
K 7 3 2

NS 3♠; E 2; E 2♣; NS 1; W 1; W 1♣; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 E−1502.002.001-Lyons-Waterman vs 1-Hill-Randolph
3 E31100.004.002-HALEY-Rimal vs 3-Schrock-Barnes
2 ♠S31403.500.503-Bender-Juarez vs 5-Larsen-Goodwin
4 ♠S−1501.003.004-Larkin-Conklin vs 2-Lebeck-Stone
1 ♠S31403.500.505-Halberg-Stetson vs 4-Richardson-Aberle

control 1


140619EEE#1

Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul
J 5 3 2
K 5 4
J
10 9 8 5 2
A K
J 10 8 7 3
K 9 6 5
A 4
N
WE
S
Q 6 4
A Q 6
A Q 10 8 4 3
3
10 9 8 7
9 2
7 2
K Q J 7 6

EW 7N; EW 7; EW 7; EW 2♠; EW 1♣; Par −1520

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 E74403.500.501-Lyons-Waterman vs 1-Hill-Randolph
5 E74403.500.502-HALEY-Rimal vs 3-Schrock-Barnes
4 W64800.004.003-Bender-Juarez vs 5-Larsen-Goodwin
3 NTW54601.502.504-Larkin-Conklin vs 2-Lebeck-Stone
3 NTW54601.502.505-Halberg-Stetson vs 4-Richardson-Aberle

control 2


140619EEE#1

Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul
Q 8 6 4
7 6
K
K 10 9 8 6 3
K 3
A 10 4 3
Q 10 6 4
J 5 4
N
WE
S
J 9 2
K J 8 5 2
9 3 2
7 2
A 10 7 5
Q 9
A J 8 7 5
A Q

NS 4♠; NS 4♣; NS 1N; NS 2; EW 1; Par +420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♠N52001.003.001-Lyons-Waterman vs 1-Hill-Randolph
4 ♠N44202.002.002-HALEY-Rimal vs 3-Schrock-Barnes
3 ♠N31400.004.003-Bender-Juarez vs 5-Larsen-Goodwin
4 ♠N64804.000.004-Larkin-Conklin vs 2-Lebeck-Stone
4 ♠N54503.001.005-Halberg-Stetson vs 4-Richardson-Aberle

control 3


140619EEE#1

Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul
6 5
A Q J 6 4 2
A K 10 9
5
10 7 4 2
K 10 8
7 3
Q J 8 2
N
WE
S
Q
9 5
Q 6 4 2
A K 10 7 4 3
A K J 9 8 3
7 3
J 8 5
9 6

NS 5♠; NS 5; NS 4; NS 1N; EW 2♣; Par +650

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 N−22001.502.501-Lyons-Waterman vs 1-Hill-Randolph
4 N66804.000.002-HALEY-Rimal vs 3-Schrock-Barnes
4 N46203.001.003-Bender-Juarez vs 5-Larsen-Goodwin
4 ♠S−22001.502.504-Larkin-Conklin vs 2-Lebeck-Stone
5 N−33000.004.005-Halberg-Stetson vs 4-Richardson-Aberle

control 4


140619EEE#1

Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul
Q 9 3
10 9 7
A K 7 6 4
A 9
10 6
A Q 5 4
Q 8 3
10 8 7 4
N
WE
S
A 7 5 2
J 3
10 9 5
Q 5 3 2
K J 8 4
K 8 6 2
J 2
K J 6

NS 3N; NS 3♠; NS 3; NS 2; NS 1♣; Par +600

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTS46304.000.001-Lyons-Waterman vs 5-Larsen-Goodwin
3 NTN36003.001.002-HALEY-Rimal vs 2-Lebeck-Stone
2 NTN31501.003.003-Bender-Juarez vs 4-Richardson-Aberle
3 NTN−22000.004.004-Larkin-Conklin vs 1-Hill-Randolph
2 NTN41802.002.005-Halberg-Stetson vs 3-Schrock-Barnes

control 5


140619EEE#1

Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul
K J 2
J 7 4
A Q 9 7
A K 2
3
A Q 10 9 8 3
K 6 5
8 4 3
N
WE
S
A Q 9 7 5
J 10 4 2
Q J 9 5
10 8 6 4
K 6 5 2
8 3
10 7 6

N 1N; EW 1N; W 2; N 1♠; W 1♠; W 1; E 1; W 1♣; Par −90

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 N−31500.004.001-Lyons-Waterman vs 5-Larsen-Goodwin
2 ♠E−22003.500.502-HALEY-Rimal vs 2-Lebeck-Stone
2 W21101.003.003-Bender-Juarez vs 4-Richardson-Aberle
2 W−11002.002.004-Larkin-Conklin vs 1-Hill-Randolph
3 ♠E−22003.500.505-Halberg-Stetson vs 3-Schrock-Barnes

control 6


140619EEE#1

Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul
Q 7 4
Q 10 9
Q 7 3 2
K 10 6
A 6 5 2
A K 7 2
J 10 8 6
8
N
WE
S
K 3
8 6 5 3
K
A Q 5 4 3 2
J 10 9 8
J 4
A 9 5 4
J 9 7

EW 5; EW 3N; EW 4♣; EW 2♠; EW 2; Par −650

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 W31404.000.001-Lyons-Waterman vs 5-Larsen-Goodwin
2 E52003.001.002-HALEY-Rimal vs 2-Lebeck-Stone
3 NTW36002.002.003-Bender-Juarez vs 4-Richardson-Aberle
3 NTE46301.003.004-Larkin-Conklin vs 1-Hill-Randolph
4 W56500.004.005-Halberg-Stetson vs 3-Schrock-Barnes

control 7


140619EEE#1

Board 8
West Deals
None Vul
5 4
Q 10 4
J 10 7 6 3
J 7 6
A K Q 7 3
K 9 7 3 2
5
Q 4
N
WE
S
J 9 8 6
6
K Q 8 4 2
9 3 2
10 2
A J 8 5
A 9
A K 10 8 5

EW 3♠; NS 3♣; NS 1N; NS 1; NS 1; Par −100: NS 4♣×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠×E−11003.250.751-Lyons-Waterman vs 5-Larsen-Goodwin
4 ♠E−21003.250.752-HALEY-Rimal vs 2-Lebeck-Stone
2 ♠E31400.133.883-Bender-Juarez vs 4-Richardson-Aberle
4 ♠W−1501.382.635-Halberg-Stetson vs 3-Schrock-Barnes

control 8


140619EEE#1

Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul
Q 4
K J 10
J 9 7 2
A Q 8 7
K 10 5 3
9
A 4 3
J 9 6 5 3
N
WE
S
J 9 8 7 2
Q 8 4 2
Q 8
4 2
A 6
A 7 6 5 3
K 10 6 5
K 10

S 6; S 5N; NS 5; N 5; N 2N; S 3♣; N 2♣; EW 1♠; Par +920

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S−31500.004.001-Lyons-Waterman vs 4-Richardson-Aberle
3 NTN−21001.502.502-HALEY-Rimal vs 1-Hill-Randolph
3 NTS−1503.001.003-Bender-Juarez vs 3-Schrock-Barnes
3 N61704.000.004-Larkin-Conklin vs 5-Larsen-Goodwin
3 NTN−21001.502.505-Halberg-Stetson vs 2-Lebeck-Stone

control 9


140619EEE#1

Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul
8 7 4
K 10 5 3
8 7 3
10 8 2
A K 5 3 2
8 6
Q 5 2
A K 9
N
WE
S
Q 10 9
A J 10 6 4
J 7 5 4 3
J 6
A Q J 9 7 4 2
K 9
Q 6

EW 6♠; EW 6; EW 6♣; NS 2; Par −1400: NS 7×−5

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠W66800.004.001-Lyons-Waterman vs 4-Richardson-Aberle
4 ♠W56501.003.002-HALEY-Rimal vs 1-Hill-Randolph
5 E66202.002.003-Bender-Juarez vs 3-Schrock-Barnes
5 ♠W−11004.000.004-Larkin-Conklin vs 5-Larsen-Goodwin
3 ♠W62303.001.005-Halberg-Stetson vs 2-Lebeck-Stone

control 10


140619EEE#1

Board 11
South Deals
None Vul
J 3
10 9 8 7 3
8 7 6 5
9 4
A K 9 6
A K 4
A K Q 9
7 5
N
WE
S
Q 4
6 5
J 4 3
A K Q J 10 2
10 8 7 5 2
Q J 2
10 2
8 6 3

EW 7N; EW 7; EW 7♣; EW 6♠; EW 4; Par −1520

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6 NTW710201.003.001-Lyons-Waterman vs 4-Richardson-Aberle
6 E79403.001.002-HALEY-Rimal vs 1-Hill-Randolph
6 NTW710201.003.003-Bender-Juarez vs 3-Schrock-Barnes
3 NTW54604.000.004-Larkin-Conklin vs 5-Larsen-Goodwin
6 NTW710201.003.005-Halberg-Stetson vs 2-Lebeck-Stone

control 11


140619EEE#1

Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul
3 2
Q 9 3
A Q 10 9 5 2
9 7
A J 10 9 7
K 4 2
4
K 6 4 2
N
WE
S
K 8 5 4
7
K 8 6 3
A J 10 8
Q 6
A J 10 8 6 5
J 7
Q 5 3

EW 5♠; EW 4N; EW 5♣; NS 1; EW 1; Par −450

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♠E52003.001.001-Lyons-Waterman vs 4-Richardson-Aberle
4 ♠W54500.503.502-HALEY-Rimal vs 1-Hill-Randolph
3 ♠W41704.000.003-Bender-Juarez vs 3-Schrock-Barnes
4 ♠W44202.002.004-Larkin-Conklin vs 5-Larsen-Goodwin
4 ♠E54500.503.505-Halberg-Stetson vs 2-Lebeck-Stone

control 12


140619EEE#1

Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul
K J
J 9
J 5 3 2
K J 6 5 2
9 8 6
Q 10 7 5 2
10 9 8 4
10
N
WE
S
A Q 7 5 4
A 8 6
K 7
A 9 7
10 3 2
K 4 3
A Q 6
Q 8 4 3

EW 3♠; EW 3; NS 3♣; NS 1; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 E31401.003.001-Lyons-Waterman vs 3-Schrock-Barnes
2 ♠E41700.004.002-HALEY-Rimal vs 5-Larsen-Goodwin
3 ♣N31103.001.003-Bender-Juarez vs 2-Lebeck-Stone
1 NTE−22004.000.004-Larkin-Conklin vs 4-Richardson-Aberle
4 ♠E−11002.002.005-Halberg-Stetson vs 1-Hill-Randolph

control 13


140619EEE#1

Board 14
East Deals
None Vul
A K Q J 8
6
A Q 7 6 3
Q 8
9 6 5 3
K 8 3
10 5 2
A J 2
N
WE
S
7 2
Q 10 9 2
K J 8 4
9 5 4
10 4
A J 7 5 4
9
K 10 7 6 3

NS 4♠; N 3N; S 5♣; NS 3; N 4♣; S 2N; NS 3; Par +420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠N54502.501.501-Lyons-Waterman vs 3-Schrock-Barnes
3 NTN34000.004.002-HALEY-Rimal vs 5-Larsen-Goodwin
3 NTS44301.003.003-Bender-Juarez vs 2-Lebeck-Stone
4 ♠N54502.501.504-Larkin-Conklin vs 4-Richardson-Aberle
3 NTS64904.000.005-Halberg-Stetson vs 1-Hill-Randolph

control 14


140619EEE#1

Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul
A 10 4 3
J 7 6 2
Q J 10 9 3
K 9 6 5
K 4
8 7 6
K 9 8 6
N
WE
S
J 7
A Q 10 9 5
K 4
A 10 7 4
Q 8 2
8 3
A 5 2
Q J 5 3 2

W 2; EW 1N; NS 2; EW 2♣; NS 1♠; E 1; Par −110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 ♣S−22000.004.001-Lyons-Waterman vs 3-Schrock-Barnes
1 E−1503.001.002-HALEY-Rimal vs 5-Larsen-Goodwin
2 N−11002.002.003-Bender-Juarez vs 2-Lebeck-Stone
2 N2904.000.004-Larkin-Conklin vs 4-Richardson-Aberle
2 NTE41801.003.005-Halberg-Stetson vs 1-Hill-Randolph

control 15


140619EEE#1

Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul
K Q 10 3
A K J
Q 5 3
Q 10 2
J 7 2
Q 10 9 8 7 3
4
A K J
N
WE
S
9 6
6 4 2
K 9 8 6 2
6 4 3
A 8 5 4
5
A J 10 7
9 8 7 5

NS 5N; NS 5♠; NS 4; NS 4♣; NS 2; Par +460

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 N2901.502.501-Lyons-Waterman vs 3-Schrock-Barnes
3 NTS34004.000.002-HALEY-Rimal vs 5-Larsen-Goodwin
1 NTN1901.502.503-Bender-Juarez vs 2-Lebeck-Stone
3 NTN−21000.004.004-Larkin-Conklin vs 4-Richardson-Aberle
1 NTN21203.001.005-Halberg-Stetson vs 1-Hill-Randolph

control 16


140619EEE#1

Board 17
North Deals
None Vul
Q 4
5
A Q J 7 6 5 3
K Q 9
A 8 7
A K 8 7
K
10 6 5 3 2
N
WE
S
J 6 2
Q 10 9 3
9 4
J 8 7 4
K 10 9 5 3
J 6 4 2
10 8 2
A

NS 5; NS 2N; NS 2♠; NS 1; EW 1♣; Par +400

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 N51500.503.501-Lyons-Waterman vs 2-Lebeck-Stone
3 NTS44303.001.002-HALEY-Rimal vs 4-Richardson-Aberle
5 ×N55504.000.003-Bender-Juarez vs 1-Hill-Randolph
2 N51500.503.504-Larkin-Conklin vs 3-Schrock-Barnes
5 N54002.002.005-Halberg-Stetson vs 5-Larsen-Goodwin

control 17


140619EEE#1

Board 18
East Deals
N-S Vul
K Q 9 3
A K J
K J 8 6
J 2
A 10 5 4
Q 6 3
A 10 9 4
7 5
N
WE
S
J 8 6 2
9 7 2
Q 5
A 9 8 4
7
10 8 5 4
7 3 2
K Q 10 6 3

NS 3; NS 3♣; NS 1N; NS 2; W 1♠; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 E−1504.000.001-Lyons-Waterman vs 2-Lebeck-Stone
1 NTW21201.003.002-HALEY-Rimal vs 4-Richardson-Aberle
1 E1803.001.003-Bender-Juarez vs 1-Hill-Randolph
2 W2902.002.004-Larkin-Conklin vs 3-Schrock-Barnes
1 E31400.004.005-Halberg-Stetson vs 5-Larsen-Goodwin

control 18


140619EEE#1

Board 19
South Deals
E-W Vul
A K Q 5
K J 9
4
10 9 8 6 2
10 9 4
10 3
A J 7 6
A Q 4 3
N
WE
S
J 7 6 2
A Q 7 6 2
Q 10 9 5
8 3
8 5 4
K 8 3 2
K J 7 5

EW 3N; EW 3; EW 2♠; EW 3; NS 1♣; Par −500: NS 4♣×−3

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♣S−1501.502.501-Lyons-Waterman vs 2-Lebeck-Stone
3 W41700.004.002-HALEY-Rimal vs 4-Richardson-Aberle
4 W−11003.001.003-Bender-Juarez vs 1-Hill-Randolph
5 ♣S−1501.502.504-Larkin-Conklin vs 3-Schrock-Barnes
5 W−22004.000.005-Halberg-Stetson vs 5-Larsen-Goodwin

control 19


140619EEE#1

Board 20
West Deals
Both Vul
9 5 3
J 10 9 4
10 7 5
J 5 3
A Q 10 2
A K 5 3
K 8 2
8 6
N
WE
S
K J 6
Q
Q 9 4 3
A K Q 7 4
8 7 4
8 7 6 2
A J 6
10 9 2

EW 6N; EW 6♠; EW 6♣; EW 5; EW 5; Par −1440

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6 ♣W613701.003.001-Lyons-Waterman vs 2-Lebeck-Stone
3 NTW66902.501.502-HALEY-Rimal vs 4-Richardson-Aberle
6 NTW714700.004.003-Bender-Juarez vs 1-Hill-Randolph
4 NTW66902.501.504-Larkin-Conklin vs 3-Schrock-Barnes
3 NTW56604.000.005-Halberg-Stetson vs 5-Larsen-Goodwin

control 20


140619EEE#1

control 21


140619EEE#1

control 22


140619EEE#1

control 23


140619EEE#1

control 24