Thursday Evening Pairs Thursday Eve Session June 12, 2014
Scores after  5 rounds  Average:   40.0      Section  A  North-South
Pair    Pct   Score  Rank   HNDCP   Total  Rank   MPs
  4   47.04   37.63         12.99   50.62   1    0.20     Ann Waterman - Mary Lyons
  2   48.29   38.63   2      9.64   48.27   2    0.28     Harley Conner - Joni Conner
  3   52.04   41.63   1      6.59   48.22        0.40     Kenneth Koutz - Robert Rottmayer
  1   45.16   36.13         10.31   46.44                 Nancy Stetson - Nan Halberg
  5   57.90   46.32  NE      6.67   52.99                 Kate Hill - Randy Randolph

Thursday Evening Pairs Thursday Eve Session June 12, 2014
Scores after  5 rounds  Average:   40.0      Section  A  East-West
Pair    Pct   Score  Rank   HNDCP   Total  Rank   MPs
  1   59.85   47.88   1      8.72   56.60   1    0.40     Kathy Juarez - Jane Bender
  4   54.23   43.38   2      9.98   53.36   2    0.28     Gordon Larsen - Doris Goodwin
  2   52.64   42.11         10.70   52.81                 Jan Conklin - Conrad Larkin
  3   40.48   32.38         14.63   47.01                 Charlene Stone - Patricia Lebeck
  5   42.98   34.38         10.74   45.12                 John Richardson - Michael Aberle



140612E1#1

Board 1
North Deals
None Vul
10 8
4 3 2
A 3
Q 10 9 6 5 4
9 7 6 2
A J 9 7
J 7 5
K J
N
WE
S
A K Q J 5 4 3
K 6
10 4
A 3
Q 10 8 5
K Q 9 8 6 2
8 7 2

EW 5♠; EW 2; EW 1N; NS 1; NS 1♣; Par −450

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6 ×S−48001.003.001-Stetson-Halberg vs 1-Juarez-Bender
6 ♠E−1504.000.002-Conner-Conner vs 3-Stone-Lebeck
4 ♠E54503.001.003-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 5-Richardson-Aberle
6 ♠E69800.004.004-Waterman-Lyons vs 2-Conklin-Larkin
5 ♠E64802.002.005-Hill-Randolph vs 4-Larsen-Goodwin

control 1


140612E1#1

Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul
J
K Q 9 7 6
K 10 9
K Q 9 4
9 4
J 4 2
A Q 7 2
10 8 6 2
N
WE
S
K Q 7 5 2
8 3
J 5 4
A 7 5
A 10 8 6 3
A 10 5
8 6 3
J 3

NS 4; NS 3N; NS 2♠; NS 3♣; NS 2; Par +620

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 N46204.000.001-Stetson-Halberg vs 1-Juarez-Bender
2 N52002.501.502-Conner-Conner vs 3-Stone-Lebeck
2 N41700.503.503-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 5-Richardson-Aberle
2 N41700.503.504-Waterman-Lyons vs 2-Conklin-Larkin
3 N52002.501.505-Hill-Randolph vs 4-Larsen-Goodwin

control 2


140612E1#1

Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul
K Q 8 7 3
J
K Q J 9 8
7 6
A Q 5 4 3 2
7 6 4
A J 8 2
N
WE
S
A J 6 5 2
7 6
10 3 2
Q 10 5
10 9 4
K 10 9 8
A 5
K 9 4 3

NS 2♠; EW 2; S 3; S 1N; N 1; EW 1♣; Par +110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠N−21001.502.501-Stetson-Halberg vs 1-Juarez-Bender
4 ♠×N−23000.004.002-Conner-Conner vs 3-Stone-Lebeck
2 ♠S21104.000.003-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 5-Richardson-Aberle
3 ♠N−1503.001.004-Waterman-Lyons vs 2-Conklin-Larkin
4 ♠N−21001.502.505-Hill-Randolph vs 4-Larsen-Goodwin

control 3


140612E1#1

Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul
Q J 7 6
3 2
3
A K Q 9 8 7
A K 10 5 3
9 5
A K J 2
J 6
N
WE
S
8 2
K Q 8 6 4
10 8 6
10 3 2
9 4
A J 10 7
Q 9 7 5 4
5 4

NS 1N; NS 2♣; EW 1♠; EW 1; Par +90

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTS−33000.004.001-Stetson-Halberg vs 1-Juarez-Bender
2 ♣N31103.001.002-Conner-Conner vs 3-Stone-Lebeck
2 W−11002.002.003-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 5-Richardson-Aberle
3 ♣N−11001.003.004-Waterman-Lyons vs 2-Conklin-Larkin
3 ♠×W−25004.000.005-Hill-Randolph vs 4-Larsen-Goodwin

control 4


140612E1#1

Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul
A J 7
Q 6
8 7 3 2
A 8 4 3
K 8 5 2
10 9 5
J 9 5 4
Q 6
N
WE
S
9 3
K J 4
A Q 6
K J 7 5 2
Q 10 6 4
A 8 7 3 2
K 10
10 9

NS 2♠; NS 2; EW 1N; EW 1; EW 1♣; Par +100: EW 2N×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 S1802.002.001-Stetson-Halberg vs 5-Richardson-Aberle
1 NTE−21004.000.002-Conner-Conner vs 2-Conklin-Larkin
1 NTN1903.001.003-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 4-Larsen-Goodwin
1 NTE1900.503.504-Waterman-Lyons vs 1-Juarez-Bender
1 NTE1900.503.505-Hill-Randolph vs 3-Stone-Lebeck

control 5


140612E1#1

Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul
A 10 8 7
K J 10 8
7
K J 10 2
K 5
Q 9 7 5 3
K J 5 2
7 3
N
WE
S
Q J 9
A 4
10 6 4
Q 9 8 6 5
6 4 3 2
6 2
A Q 9 8 3
A 4

NS 3♠; NS 2N; N 2; S 1; NS 1; NS 1♣; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠N−21000.004.001-Stetson-Halberg vs 5-Richardson-Aberle
2 ♠N31403.001.002-Conner-Conner vs 2-Conklin-Larkin
2 ♠S41704.000.003-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 4-Larsen-Goodwin
1 NTE−11001.003.004-Waterman-Lyons vs 1-Juarez-Bender
1 ♠S21102.002.005-Hill-Randolph vs 3-Stone-Lebeck

control 6


140612E1#1

Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul
Q 9 8 7
K
7 6 5 4 2
Q 7 4
4
A Q 7 6 3 2
K 3
A 10 8 5
N
WE
S
A 10 5 2
10 9 8 5
A Q J
9 3
K J 6 3
J 4
10 9 8
K J 6 2

EW 6; EW 5N; EW 2♣; EW 1♠; EW 1; Par −1430

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 W56502.002.001-Stetson-Halberg vs 5-Richardson-Aberle
4 W56502.002.002-Conner-Conner vs 2-Conklin-Larkin
4 W56502.002.003-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 4-Larsen-Goodwin
4 W56502.002.004-Waterman-Lyons vs 1-Juarez-Bender
4 W56502.002.005-Hill-Randolph vs 3-Stone-Lebeck

control 7


140612E1#1

Board 8
West Deals
None Vul
K Q 3
J 5 4
J 7 6 4 2
J 2
8 7 6 2
Q 9 8 7
K 9
Q 5 3
N
WE
S
A 10 9
K 2
10 8 5 3
A K 9 8
J 5 4
A 10 6 3
A Q
10 7 6 4

E 2N; EW 2♠; W 1N; E 2♣; EW 1; EW 1; W 1♣; Par −120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTW1902.501.501-Stetson-Halberg vs 5-Richardson-Aberle
2 ♠W21100.503.502-Conner-Conner vs 2-Conklin-Larkin
1 ♣E1704.000.003-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 4-Larsen-Goodwin
1 NTE1902.501.504-Waterman-Lyons vs 1-Juarez-Bender
2 ♠W21100.503.505-Hill-Randolph vs 3-Stone-Lebeck

control 8


140612E1#1

Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul
A 9 8 7 6
6 4 2
Q 9 6 3
J
K Q 10 5 4 2
9 8
10 7 4 2
Q
N
WE
S
A K Q 3
K J 8
A 8 7 6 5 3
J 3
J 10 7 5
A 5
K 10 9 4 2

EW 2♠; EW 2; EW 1N; EW 2; EW 2♣; Par −110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTE31500.004.001-Stetson-Halberg vs 4-Larsen-Goodwin
3 ♣E−11001.502.502-Conner-Conner vs 1-Juarez-Bender
3 NTE−22003.001.003-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 3-Stone-Lebeck
3 NTE−11001.502.504-Waterman-Lyons vs 5-Richardson-Aberle
3 ♠W−33004.000.005-Hill-Randolph vs 2-Conklin-Larkin

control 9


140612E1#1

Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul
A Q J 10 7 4
A J 7
Q J 10 6
9 6
Q 10 5 4 2
10 6 4
A 9 4
N
WE
S
8 5 3 2
K J 9 8 7 2
8 5 3
K
K 9 8 6 3
A Q 5 3
K 7 2

NS 6N; N 5♠; S 4♠; NS 4; N 5♣; S 4♣; NS 1; Par +1440

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S46202.002.001-Stetson-Halberg vs 4-Larsen-Goodwin
6 ×S−25000.004.002-Conner-Conner vs 1-Juarez-Bender
4 ×S47904.000.003-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 3-Stone-Lebeck
6 S−22001.003.004-Waterman-Lyons vs 5-Richardson-Aberle
3 NTN66903.001.005-Hill-Randolph vs 2-Conklin-Larkin

control 10


140612E1#1

Board 11
South Deals
None Vul
10 9 6 5
K 2
10 4
Q 9 7 6 2
K 4
A Q J 8 5 4
K 9
A 10 8
N
WE
S
A J 8 3
10 9 6
Q J 8 5
4 3
Q 7 2
7 3
A 7 6 3 2
K J 5

EW 4; EW 1N; EW 2; EW 1♠; NS 1♣; Par −420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 W54500.503.501-Stetson-Halberg vs 4-Larsen-Goodwin
4 W44202.501.502-Conner-Conner vs 1-Juarez-Bender
4 W54500.503.503-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 3-Stone-Lebeck
3 W52004.000.004-Waterman-Lyons vs 5-Richardson-Aberle
4 W44202.501.505-Hill-Randolph vs 2-Conklin-Larkin

control 11


140612E1#1

Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul
Q
Q J 10 8 4
A 8 7 4
Q 7 5
J 9 8
A 7 6
9 6 3
A 8 6 3
N
WE
S
A 10 7 5 4
K
K Q J
K 10 4 2
K 6 3 2
9 5 3 2
10 5 2
J 9

EW 4♠; EW 3N; EW 4♣; EW 2; EW 1; Par −420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♠E41702.631.381-Stetson-Halberg vs 4-Larsen-Goodwin
2 ♠E41702.631.382-Conner-Conner vs 1-Juarez-Bender
2 N−33000.133.883-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 3-Stone-Lebeck
3 ♠E41702.631.384-Waterman-Lyons vs 5-Richardson-Aberle

control 12


140612E1#1

Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul
9 8 5 2
7
Q J 9 7
9 8 5 3
Q J 6
A Q J 10 8
8 5 2
K Q
N
WE
S
K 7 4 3
4 2
A K 6 3
10 4 2
A 10
K 9 6 5 3
10 4
A J 7 6

EW 3; EW 2N; EW 2♠; EW 2; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠W−33004.000.001-Stetson-Halberg vs 3-Stone-Lebeck
1 S−22001.003.002-Conner-Conner vs 5-Richardson-Aberle
2 NTW−11002.501.503-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 2-Conklin-Larkin
1 S−33000.004.004-Waterman-Lyons vs 4-Larsen-Goodwin
3 NTW−11002.501.505-Hill-Randolph vs 1-Juarez-Bender

control 13


140612E1#1

Board 14
East Deals
None Vul
K Q J 10 6
10 7 5
10 8
A Q 7
A
K 9 6 4 2
A Q 5 2
K J 8
N
WE
S
3 2
A J 8 3
7 6 4
6 5 3 2
9 8 7 5 4
Q
K J 9 3
10 9 4

EW 4; NS 3♠; EW 2N; EW 2; EW 2♣; Par −100: NS 4♠×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠S−1501.502.501-Stetson-Halberg vs 3-Stone-Lebeck
3 ♠N31404.000.002-Conner-Conner vs 5-Richardson-Aberle
5 W−21003.001.003-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 2-Conklin-Larkin
3 W31400.004.004-Waterman-Lyons vs 4-Larsen-Goodwin
4 ♠N−1501.502.505-Hill-Randolph vs 1-Juarez-Bender

control 14


140612E1#1

Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul
A Q 2
Q J 9 6
Q 4 2
7 3 2
3
K 10 2
K 10 7 6 3
J 10 8 6
N
WE
S
9 8 7 6
A 8 7 3
8
A K Q 5
K J 10 5 4
5 4
A J 9 5
9 4

EW 4♣; EW 2; EW 1N; NS 1♠; EW 1; Par −130

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 ♠S1803.001.001-Stetson-Halberg vs 3-Stone-Lebeck
1 ♠S1803.001.002-Conner-Conner vs 5-Richardson-Aberle
2 ♠S−22000.004.003-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 2-Conklin-Larkin
1 ♣E2901.003.004-Waterman-Lyons vs 4-Larsen-Goodwin
1 ♠S1803.001.005-Hill-Randolph vs 1-Juarez-Bender

control 15


140612E1#1

Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul
K 6
10 9 2
A Q J 9 8 5 2
K
10 8
Q 4
10
Q 10 9 7 6 5 3 2
N
WE
S
J 7 5 4 3
J 8 3
7 3
A J 8
A Q 9 2
A K 7 6 5
K 6 4
4

NS 6; NS 5; NS 2♠; EW 1♣; Par +920

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6 N69203.500.501-Stetson-Halberg vs 3-Stone-Lebeck
4 S54501.003.002-Conner-Conner vs 5-Richardson-Aberle
4 S54501.003.003-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 2-Conklin-Larkin
6 N69203.500.504-Waterman-Lyons vs 4-Larsen-Goodwin
4 S54501.003.005-Hill-Randolph vs 1-Juarez-Bender

control 16


140612E1#1

Board 17
North Deals
None Vul
K 7 2
K 9 3
9 3 2
J 9 5 4
J 6 5 4
8 2
5 4
K 10 7 6 2
N
WE
S
A Q 9 8 3
A Q 7 6 4
A
8 3
10
J 10 5
K Q J 10 8 7 6
A Q

EW 6♠; EW 4; EW 3♣; NS 1; Par −980

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 S−21002.002.001-Stetson-Halberg vs 2-Conklin-Larkin
3 ♠E52000.004.002-Conner-Conner vs 4-Larsen-Goodwin
3 ♠E41701.003.003-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 1-Juarez-Bender
5 ♠E−1504.000.004-Waterman-Lyons vs 3-Stone-Lebeck
3 S−1503.001.005-Hill-Randolph vs 5-Richardson-Aberle

control 17


140612E1#1

Board 18
East Deals
N-S Vul
9 8 7
A K
Q 8 6 4 2
A 8 3
4 3 2
J 10 8 4 3 2
9 7
10 6
N
WE
S
A Q 5
Q 9 7
K 5 3
K J 7 4
K J 10 6
6 5
A J 10
Q 9 5 2

NS 5N; N 5♠; S 4♠; NS 5; NS 4♣; NS 1; Par +660

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 E−1500.004.001-Stetson-Halberg vs 2-Conklin-Larkin
1 NTE−31503.001.002-Conner-Conner vs 4-Larsen-Goodwin
2 E−21001.502.503-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 1-Juarez-Bender
2 E−21001.502.504-Waterman-Lyons vs 3-Stone-Lebeck
3 N61704.000.005-Hill-Randolph vs 5-Richardson-Aberle

control 18


140612E1#1

Board 19
South Deals
E-W Vul
K 9 7 6 2
10
K 10 9 7
Q 9 5
A Q 8 4
2
A J 8 4 3 2
7 2
N
WE
S
5
K Q J 9 8 7 5
5
A 8 6 3
J 10 3
A 6 4 3
Q 6
K J 10 4

EW 3; NS 2♠; NS 1; NS 1♣; Par −100: NS 3♠×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 E31401.003.001-Stetson-Halberg vs 2-Conklin-Larkin
3 E31401.003.002-Conner-Conner vs 4-Larsen-Goodwin
3 E31401.003.003-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 1-Juarez-Bender
4 E−11004.000.004-Waterman-Lyons vs 3-Stone-Lebeck
3 ♠N−1503.001.005-Hill-Randolph vs 5-Richardson-Aberle

control 19


140612E1#1

Board 20
West Deals
Both Vul
K 10
A
Q 7 6 4 3
J 10 8 6 3
A J 5 4
Q J 9 8
10 9 8
Q 5
N
WE
S
Q 9 7 6
K 7 5
K 2
K 9 4 2
8 3 2
10 6 4 3 2
A J 5
A 7

NS 4; NS 2N; NS 3♣; EW 1♠; NS 1; Par +130

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 N2903.001.001-Stetson-Halberg vs 2-Conklin-Larkin
1 S−33000.004.002-Conner-Conner vs 4-Larsen-Goodwin
PassPass1.502.503-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 1-Juarez-Bender
1 ♠W−11004.000.004-Waterman-Lyons vs 3-Stone-Lebeck
PassPass1.502.505-Hill-Randolph vs 5-Richardson-Aberle

control 20


140612E1#1

control 21


140612E1#1

control 22


140612E1#1

control 23


140612E1#1

control 24


140612E1#1

control 25


140612E1#1

control 26


140612E1#1

control 27