Thursday Evening Pairs Thursday Eve Session February 20, 2014
Scores after  5 rounds  Average:   40.0      Section  A  North-South
Pair    Pct   Score  Rank   HNDCP   Total  Rank   MPs
  4   57.04   45.63   2     11.06   56.69   1    0.28     Nan Halberg - Rich Gain
  2   50.79   40.63         10.22   50.85   2    0.14     Ann Waterman - Nancy Stetson
  5   61.41   49.13   1      0.00   49.13        0.40     Kathy Juarez - Abbe Cohen
  1   42.10   33.68         12.72   46.40                 Robert Rottmayer - Kenneth Koutz
  3   38.29   30.63         11.62   42.25                 Doris Mendell - Gordon Stedman

Thursday Evening Pairs Thursday Eve Session February 20, 2014
Scores after  5 rounds  Average:   40.0      Section  A  East-West
Pair    Pct   Score  Rank   HNDCP   Total  Rank   MPs
  5   65.48   52.38   1     14.32   66.70   1    0.40     Gordon Larsen - John Richardson
  4   55.93   44.74   2     15.84   60.58   2    0.28     Judy Sitzman - Doris Beckert
  3   53.60   42.88         14.05   56.93                 Enid Barnes - Rob Granshaw
  2   54.85   43.88          8.53   52.41                 Conrad Larkin - Jan Conklin
  1   20.48   16.38         18.22   34.60                 Gus Beckert - Margie Smith



100220E5#1

Board 1
North Deals
None Vul
Q 2
Q 8 7 5 4 3 2
K J 8 6
A K 5 4 2
6 4 3
J
10 7 5 3
N
WE
S
6 3
A K 8 7
A K 10
A Q 9 4
Q J 10 9 8 7
J 10 9 5
9 6
2

EW 4N; W 4; EW 5♣; EW 3♠; E 3; EW 2; Par −430

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 E−1503.001.001-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 1-Beckert-Smith
3 N−31500.004.002-Waterman-Stetson vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw
3 N−21001.003.003-Mendell-Stedman vs 5-Larsen-Richardson
4 NTE−1503.001.004-Halberg-Gain vs 2-Larkin-Conklin
4 ♠E−1503.001.005-Juarez-Cohen vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert

control 1


100220E5#1

Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul
K 10 9 6
Q J 10 9 6 4 2
A 6
4
A J 2
K 8 7 5
K J 9 8 2
N
WE
S
Q 8 7 5 3 2
10 4
A 3
10 7 5
A J
K Q 9 8 7 6 5 3
Q 4 3

S 4; N 3; NS 2; NS 1♠; Par +620

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S56503.500.501-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 1-Beckert-Smith
4 S46201.003.002-Waterman-Stetson vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw
4 S46201.003.003-Mendell-Stedman vs 5-Larsen-Richardson
4 S56503.500.504-Halberg-Gain vs 2-Larkin-Conklin
4 S46201.003.005-Juarez-Cohen vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert

control 2


100220E5#1

Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul
9 8 7 5
A J 9 5
3
A Q J 6
2
10 2
K J 10 8 7 5
10 9 8 2
N
WE
S
K J 6
K Q 7 4
A 9 6 2
K 4
A Q 10 4 3
8 6 3
Q 4
7 5 3

N 4♠; S 3♠; EW 4; NS 1N; NS 1; NS 1♣; Par +200: EW 5×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♠S41704.000.001-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 1-Beckert-Smith
1 NTE21201.502.502-Waterman-Stetson vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw
1 NTE21201.502.503-Mendell-Stedman vs 5-Larsen-Richardson
4 W41300.004.004-Halberg-Gain vs 2-Larkin-Conklin
3 ♠S31403.001.005-Juarez-Cohen vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert

control 3


100220E5#1

Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul
K 8 6 5
Q 4
A 10 9 4 2
A 5
J 10 7 4 3
K J 10 3
3
9 7 4
N
WE
S
A Q 9
8 7 6 5 2
K Q 8
K 6
2
A 9
J 7 6 5
Q J 10 8 3 2

EW 3; EW 2♠; NS 2; NS 2♣; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 N−22000.004.001-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 1-Beckert-Smith
3 N−11003.001.002-Waterman-Stetson vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw
3 N−11003.001.003-Mendell-Stedman vs 5-Larsen-Richardson
3 N−11003.001.004-Halberg-Gain vs 2-Larkin-Conklin
3 E31401.003.005-Juarez-Cohen vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert

control 4


100220E5#1

Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul
J 8 3 2
7
10 8 7
A Q 8 6 2
A K Q 6 4
A 9 8 5 3 2
A
9
N
WE
S
K 6 4
Q J 9 6 5 4 3 2
10 4
10 9 7 5
Q J 10
K
K J 7 5 3

EW 5; EW 5; EW 2N; EW 2♠; NS 1♣; Par −450

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 ♠S−55000.004.001-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 5-Larsen-Richardson
5 E74401.003.002-Waterman-Stetson vs 2-Larkin-Conklin
5 E64202.501.503-Mendell-Stedman vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert
4 E51504.000.004-Halberg-Gain vs 1-Beckert-Smith
4 W44202.501.505-Juarez-Cohen vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw

control 5


100220E5#1

Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul
Q 4
A K J 10 8 4
J 8
9 6 5
A 7 3 2
Q 2
A Q 10 7 5
10 2
N
WE
S
K 10 9 8
7
K 9 4 2
K Q J 8
J 6 5
9 6 5 3
6 3
A 7 4 3

EW 4♠; EW 5; EW 2♣; NS 1; Par −620

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 ♠W41701.502.501-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 5-Larsen-Richardson
3 N−1504.000.002-Waterman-Stetson vs 2-Larkin-Conklin
4 ♠W46200.004.003-Mendell-Stedman vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert
2 ♠W41701.502.504-Halberg-Gain vs 1-Beckert-Smith
4 N−31503.001.005-Juarez-Cohen vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw

control 6


100220E5#1

Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul
10 7
K Q 9 8 6 5
K 8
9 6 2
A 9 8 5 3
4 2
Q 7 3 2
Q 5
N
WE
S
K Q J 6
A J 7
J 6 5 4
10 8
4 2
10 3
A 10 9
A K J 7 4 3

NS 3; NS 4♣; NS 1N; EW 2; EW 1♠; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 N31404.000.001-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 5-Larsen-Richardson
3 ♠E−11002.002.002-Waterman-Stetson vs 2-Larkin-Conklin
4 S−22000.004.003-Mendell-Stedman vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert
2 ♣N41303.001.004-Halberg-Gain vs 1-Beckert-Smith
4 S−11001.003.005-Juarez-Cohen vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw

control 7


100220E5#1

Board 8
West Deals
None Vul
10 8
K 10 8 6 4
A 9 5
Q 8 4
K 9 7 4 2
J 9 7 3
10 7 6 2
N
WE
S
A Q 5 3
Q 5
J 8 4 3
A 10 3
J 6
A 2
K Q
K J 9 7 6 5 2

NS 4♣; EW 2♠; NS 2; NS 1N; EW 2; Par +130

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 ♠W−1500.004.001-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 5-Larsen-Richardson
3 ♣N41301.502.502-Waterman-Stetson vs 2-Larkin-Conklin
3 ♣N51503.001.003-Mendell-Stedman vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert
1 ♣W−42004.000.004-Halberg-Gain vs 1-Beckert-Smith
4 ♣N41301.502.505-Juarez-Cohen vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw

control 8


100220E5#1

Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul
A 7
9
A 8 6 3
A K 9 8 4 3
K Q J 9
Q 10 6
10 5 4
J 10 6
N
WE
S
10 6 5 4 3
K 7 4 2
K Q 9
Q
8 2
A J 8 5 3
J 7 2
7 5 2

NS 2N; EW 2♠; NS 3♣; NS 2; EW 1; Par +120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♠E−11002.501.501-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert
2 ♣N31104.000.002-Waterman-Stetson vs 1-Beckert-Smith
2 N−21000.004.003-Mendell-Stedman vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw
2 N−1501.003.004-Halberg-Gain vs 5-Larsen-Richardson
3 ♠E−11002.501.505-Juarez-Cohen vs 2-Larkin-Conklin

control 9


100220E5#1

Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul
8
K 10 8 2
Q 8 7
10 8 7 4 3
A 9 4
4
10 5 3 2
A K Q 6 2
N
WE
S
K 7 6
J 9 6 5 3
K J 6 4
9
Q J 10 5 3 2
A Q 7
A 9
J 5

EW 3; NS 1♠; NS 1; EW 1♣; Par −110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 ♠N−11000.503.501-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert
3 ♣W−33004.000.002-Waterman-Stetson vs 1-Beckert-Smith
2 ♠S−11000.503.503-Mendell-Stedman vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw
2 ♣W−22003.001.004-Halberg-Gain vs 5-Larsen-Richardson
2 ♠S21102.002.005-Juarez-Cohen vs 2-Larkin-Conklin

control 10


100220E5#1

Board 11
South Deals
None Vul
K Q 10
K 9 5 3
10 9 2
Q 8 2
A 3
6 4
A Q 7 6
A J 10 9 6
N
WE
S
J 9 7 6 5
A Q 10 8 2
J 8
7
8 4 2
J 7
K 5 4 3
K 5 4 3

W 4♠; E 4; E 3N; E 3♠; W 3; W 4♣; W 2N; EW 3; E 3♣; Par −420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTE44300.004.001-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert
2 ♣W2903.001.002-Waterman-Stetson vs 1-Beckert-Smith
2 NTE21201.502.503-Mendell-Stedman vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw
2 NTW21201.502.504-Halberg-Gain vs 5-Larsen-Richardson
3 NTW−1504.000.005-Juarez-Cohen vs 2-Larkin-Conklin

control 11


100220E5#1

Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul
K 8 7 4
K 9 2
K 8 4 2
J 9
Q 10 5 3
Q J 4
Q 9 7
10 6 3
N
WE
S
A 2
10 8 6 5
6 5 3
K 8 7 4
J 9 6
A 7 3
A J 10
A Q 5 2

NS 4N; NS 4♠; NS 3; NS 4; NS 3♣; Par +630

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTS46302.631.382-Waterman-Stetson vs 1-Beckert-Smith
3 NTS46302.631.383-Mendell-Stedman vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw
3 NTS36000.133.884-Halberg-Gain vs 5-Larsen-Richardson
3 NTS46302.631.385-Juarez-Cohen vs 2-Larkin-Conklin

control 12


100220E5#1

Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul
A 8 3
2
A K Q 6 5 3
8 7 4
2
A K Q J 7 5 3
J 8
Q J 6
N
WE
S
10 9 7 6 5
9 8 6
10 9 7
K 3
K Q J 4
10 4
4 2
A 10 9 5 2

NS 5; NS 3♠; EW 3; NS 4♣; Par +500: EW 5×−2

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 W−11003.001.001-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw
3 W41700.004.002-Waterman-Stetson vs 5-Larsen-Richardson
3 ♠S−11002.002.003-Mendell-Stedman vs 2-Larkin-Conklin
2 W31401.003.004-Halberg-Gain vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert
5 N56004.000.005-Juarez-Cohen vs 1-Beckert-Smith

control 13


100220E5#1

Board 14
East Deals
None Vul
K 10 4
A K 7 6
A 10 8 2
K 5
Q 6 2
Q 5
K Q 7
A 10 4 3 2
N
WE
S
9 7
J 10 9 8 2
J 9 6
Q 9 7
A J 8 5 3
4 3
5 4 3
J 8 6

NS 3♠; NS 2N; NS 2; EW 1♣; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTN21202.002.001-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw
2 ♠N21101.003.002-Waterman-Stetson vs 5-Larsen-Richardson
1 NTW−21000.004.003-Mendell-Stedman vs 2-Larkin-Conklin
2 ♠N31403.001.004-Halberg-Gain vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert
2 ♠N52004.000.005-Juarez-Cohen vs 1-Beckert-Smith

control 14


100220E5#1

Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul
K 7
K 7 6 5
6 4
A J 9 6 4
Q J 9 3
K Q 9 8 7
K 10 7 2
N
WE
S
6 4 2
A 10 8 3 2
J 5 2
Q 5
A 10 8 5
Q J 9 4
A 10 3
8 3

NS 3; NS 2N; S 3♣; W 2; N 2♣; NS 1♠; E 1; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♠S−11001.003.001-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw
4 S−11001.003.002-Waterman-Stetson vs 5-Larsen-Richardson
4 N−11001.003.003-Mendell-Stedman vs 2-Larkin-Conklin
2 W−21003.001.004-Halberg-Gain vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert
2 S21104.000.005-Juarez-Cohen vs 1-Beckert-Smith

control 15


100220E5#1

Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul
A 10
J 8 5 4 3 2
A J 8 7 3
K J 7 3
A 9
A 9 7 6
K 10 4
N
WE
S
Q 5
Q J 8 6 4 3 2
K Q 10
6
9 8 6 4 2
K 10 7 5
Q 9 5 2

E 3; NS 4♣; EW 2N; NS 2♠; W 2; EW 1; Par +130

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 E−11003.001.001-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw
2 ♠S−21002.002.002-Waterman-Stetson vs 5-Larsen-Richardson
4 W46200.004.003-Mendell-Stedman vs 2-Larkin-Conklin
2 E21101.003.004-Halberg-Gain vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert
4 E−22004.000.005-Juarez-Cohen vs 1-Beckert-Smith

control 16


100220E5#1

Board 17
North Deals
None Vul
10 4 2
A 8 7
Q J 10 8 7
A 6
A J 9 6 5
J 10 4
K 6 5 3
9
N
WE
S
Q 8 7
K 9 6 3
2
Q J 10 5 4
K 3
Q 5 2
A 9 4
K 8 7 3 2

S 2N; EW 2♠; N 1N; NS 2; EW 1; EW 1♣; Par +100: EW 3♠×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 N−1500.503.501-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 2-Larkin-Conklin
1 NTS21204.000.002-Waterman-Stetson vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert
1 N2902.002.003-Mendell-Stedman vs 1-Beckert-Smith
3 N31103.001.004-Halberg-Gain vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw
3 NTN−1500.503.505-Juarez-Cohen vs 5-Larsen-Richardson

control 17


100220E5#1

Board 18
East Deals
N-S Vul
9 8 3 2
K
K 5 3
A K J 9 2
A Q 4
Q J 9 8 6
10 6 4
6 5
N
WE
S
J 7
A 10 4 3 2
A
Q 10 7 4 3
K 10 6 5
7 5
Q J 9 8 7 2
8

EW 5; EW 2N; NS 2♠; NS 3; EW 2♣; Par −450

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 E44201.502.501-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 2-Larkin-Conklin
2 E41703.001.002-Waterman-Stetson vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert
2 ♣N−11004.000.003-Mendell-Stedman vs 1-Beckert-Smith
4 E44201.502.504-Halberg-Gain vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw
4 E54500.004.005-Juarez-Cohen vs 5-Larsen-Richardson

control 18


100220E5#1

Board 19
South Deals
E-W Vul
Q 8 4
A 9
J 7 5 4
Q J 3 2
K 7
8 4
9 6 2
A K 10 7 5 4
N
WE
S
J 9 3
Q 7 6 2
Q 10 8 3
9 8
A 10 6 5 2
K J 10 5 3
A K
6

NS 5♠; NS 4; NS 3N; NS 2; NS 1♣; Par +450

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTN34002.002.001-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 2-Larkin-Conklin
3 NTN−1500.004.002-Waterman-Stetson vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert
2 S41701.003.003-Mendell-Stedman vs 1-Beckert-Smith
4 ♠S54503.500.504-Halberg-Gain vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw
4 ♠S54503.500.505-Juarez-Cohen vs 5-Larsen-Richardson

control 19


100220E5#1

Board 20
West Deals
Both Vul
Q 8 2
10 7 6 2
A 8 7 3 2
2
K 7 5
A Q 8 4
K 4
A 9 8 6
N
WE
S
A 10 9 6
K 3
Q 10 9
K 10 7 4
J 4 3
J 9 5
J 6 5
Q J 5 3

EW 4N; EW 4♠; EW 4; EW 5♣; EW 3; Par −630

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW46300.004.001-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 2-Larkin-Conklin
3 NTW36002.002.002-Waterman-Stetson vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert
3 ♣W41304.000.003-Mendell-Stedman vs 1-Beckert-Smith
3 NTW36002.002.004-Halberg-Gain vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw
3 NTW36002.002.005-Juarez-Cohen vs 5-Larsen-Richardson

control 20


100220E5#1

control 21


100220E5#1

control 22


100220E5#1

control 23


100220E5#1

control 24


100220E5#1

control 25


100220E5#1

control 26


100220E5#1

control 27


100220E5#1

control 28