Thursday Evening Pairs Thursday Eve Session February 20, 2014 Scores after 5 rounds Average: 40.0 Section A North-South Pair Pct Score Rank HNDCP Total Rank MPs 4 57.04 45.63 2 11.06 56.69 1 0.28 Nan Halberg - Rich Gain 2 50.79 40.63 10.22 50.85 2 0.14 Ann Waterman - Nancy Stetson 5 61.41 49.13 1 0.00 49.13 0.40 Kathy Juarez - Abbe Cohen 1 42.10 33.68 12.72 46.40 Robert Rottmayer - Kenneth Koutz 3 38.29 30.63 11.62 42.25 Doris Mendell - Gordon Stedman Thursday Evening Pairs Thursday Eve Session February 20, 2014 Scores after 5 rounds Average: 40.0 Section A East-West Pair Pct Score Rank HNDCP Total Rank MPs 5 65.48 52.38 1 14.32 66.70 1 0.40 Gordon Larsen - John Richardson 4 55.93 44.74 2 15.84 60.58 2 0.28 Judy Sitzman - Doris Beckert 3 53.60 42.88 14.05 56.93 Enid Barnes - Rob Granshaw 2 54.85 43.88 8.53 52.41 Conrad Larkin - Jan Conklin 1 20.48 16.38 18.22 34.60 Gus Beckert - Margie Smith
Board 1 North Deals None Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EW 4N; W 4♥; EW 5♣; EW 3♠; E 3♥; EW 2♦; Par −430
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
3 ♥ | E | −1 | 50 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 1-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 1-Beckert-Smith | ||
3 ♦ | N | −3 | 150 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 2-Waterman-Stetson vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw | ||
3 ♦ | N | −2 | 100 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 3-Mendell-Stedman vs 5-Larsen-Richardson | ||
4 NT | E | −1 | 50 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 4-Halberg-Gain vs 2-Larkin-Conklin | ||
4 ♠ | E | −1 | 50 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 5-Juarez-Cohen vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert |
control 1
Board 2 East Deals N-S Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
S 4♥; N 3♥; NS 2♦; NS 1♠; Par +620
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
4 ♥ | S | 5 | 650 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 1-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 1-Beckert-Smith | ||
4 ♥ | S | 4 | 620 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 2-Waterman-Stetson vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw | ||
4 ♥ | S | 4 | 620 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 3-Mendell-Stedman vs 5-Larsen-Richardson | ||
4 ♥ | S | 5 | 650 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 4-Halberg-Gain vs 2-Larkin-Conklin | ||
4 ♥ | S | 4 | 620 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 5-Juarez-Cohen vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert |
control 2
Board 3 South Deals E-W Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
N 4♠; S 3♠; EW 4♦; NS 1N; NS 1♥; NS 1♣; Par +200: EW 5♦×−1
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
3 ♠ | S | 4 | 170 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 1-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 1-Beckert-Smith | ||
1 NT | E | 2 | 120 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 2-Waterman-Stetson vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw | ||
1 NT | E | 2 | 120 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 3-Mendell-Stedman vs 5-Larsen-Richardson | ||
4 ♦ | W | 4 | 130 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 4-Halberg-Gain vs 2-Larkin-Conklin | ||
3 ♠ | S | 3 | 140 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 5-Juarez-Cohen vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert |
control 3
Board 4 West Deals Both Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EW 3♥; EW 2♠; NS 2♦; NS 2♣; Par −140
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
3 ♦ | N | −2 | 200 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 1-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 1-Beckert-Smith | ||
3 ♦ | N | −1 | 100 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 2-Waterman-Stetson vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw | ||
3 ♦ | N | −1 | 100 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 3-Mendell-Stedman vs 5-Larsen-Richardson | ||
3 ♦ | N | −1 | 100 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 4-Halberg-Gain vs 2-Larkin-Conklin | ||
3 ♥ | E | 3 | 140 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 5-Juarez-Cohen vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert |
control 4
Board 5 North Deals N-S Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EW 5♥; EW 5♦; EW 2N; EW 2♠; NS 1♣; Par −450
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
2 ♠ | S | −5 | 500 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 1-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 5-Larsen-Richardson | ||
5 ♦ | E | 7 | 440 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 2-Waterman-Stetson vs 2-Larkin-Conklin | ||
5 ♦ | E | 6 | 420 | 2.50 | 1.50 | 3-Mendell-Stedman vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert | ||
4 ♦ | E | 5 | 150 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 4-Halberg-Gain vs 1-Beckert-Smith | ||
4 ♥ | W | 4 | 420 | 2.50 | 1.50 | 5-Juarez-Cohen vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw |
control 5
Board 6 East Deals E-W Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EW 4♠; EW 5♦; EW 2♣; NS 1♥; Par −620
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
2 ♠ | W | 4 | 170 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 1-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 5-Larsen-Richardson | ||
3 ♥ | N | −1 | 50 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 2-Waterman-Stetson vs 2-Larkin-Conklin | ||
4 ♠ | W | 4 | 620 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 3-Mendell-Stedman vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert | ||
2 ♠ | W | 4 | 170 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 4-Halberg-Gain vs 1-Beckert-Smith | ||
4 ♥ | N | −3 | 150 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 5-Juarez-Cohen vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw |
control 6
Board 7 South Deals Both Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 3♥; NS 4♣; NS 1N; EW 2♦; EW 1♠; Par +140
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
3 ♥ | N | 3 | 140 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 1-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 5-Larsen-Richardson | ||
3 ♠ | E | −1 | 100 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2-Waterman-Stetson vs 2-Larkin-Conklin | ||
4 ♥ | S | −2 | 200 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 3-Mendell-Stedman vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert | ||
2 ♣ | N | 4 | 130 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 4-Halberg-Gain vs 1-Beckert-Smith | ||
4 ♥ | S | −1 | 100 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 5-Juarez-Cohen vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw |
control 7
Board 8 West Deals None Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 4♣; EW 2♠; NS 2♥; NS 1N; EW 2♦; Par +130
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
2 ♠ | W | −1 | 50 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 1-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 5-Larsen-Richardson | ||
3 ♣ | N | 4 | 130 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 2-Waterman-Stetson vs 2-Larkin-Conklin | ||
3 ♣ | N | 5 | 150 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 3-Mendell-Stedman vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert | ||
1 ♣ | W | −4 | 200 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 4-Halberg-Gain vs 1-Beckert-Smith | ||
4 ♣ | N | 4 | 130 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 5-Juarez-Cohen vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw |
control 8
Board 9 North Deals E-W Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 2N; EW 2♠; NS 3♣; NS 2♦; EW 1♥; Par +120
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
3 ♠ | E | −1 | 100 | 2.50 | 1.50 | 1-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert | ||
2 ♣ | N | 3 | 110 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 2-Waterman-Stetson vs 1-Beckert-Smith | ||
2 ♦ | N | −2 | 100 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 3-Mendell-Stedman vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw | ||
2 ♦ | N | −1 | 50 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 4-Halberg-Gain vs 5-Larsen-Richardson | ||
3 ♠ | E | −1 | 100 | 2.50 | 1.50 | 5-Juarez-Cohen vs 2-Larkin-Conklin |
control 9
Board 10 East Deals Both Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EW 3♦; NS 1♠; NS 1♥; EW 1♣; Par −110
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
2 ♠ | N | −1 | 100 | 0.50 | 3.50 | 1-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert | ||
3 ♣ | W | −3 | 300 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 2-Waterman-Stetson vs 1-Beckert-Smith | ||
2 ♠ | S | −1 | 100 | 0.50 | 3.50 | 3-Mendell-Stedman vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw | ||
2 ♣ | W | −2 | 200 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 4-Halberg-Gain vs 5-Larsen-Richardson | ||
2 ♠ | S | 2 | 110 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 5-Juarez-Cohen vs 2-Larkin-Conklin |
control 10
Board 11 South Deals None Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
W 4♠; E 4♥; E 3N; E 3♠; W 3♥; W 4♣; W 2N; EW 3♦; E 3♣; Par −420
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
3 NT | E | 4 | 430 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 1-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert | ||
2 ♣ | W | 2 | 90 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 2-Waterman-Stetson vs 1-Beckert-Smith | ||
2 NT | E | 2 | 120 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 3-Mendell-Stedman vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw | ||
2 NT | W | 2 | 120 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 4-Halberg-Gain vs 5-Larsen-Richardson | ||
3 NT | W | −1 | 50 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 5-Juarez-Cohen vs 2-Larkin-Conklin |
control 11
Board 12 West Deals N-S Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 4N; NS 4♠; NS 3♥; NS 4♦; NS 3♣; Par +630
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
3 NT | S | 4 | 630 | 2.63 | 1.38 | 2-Waterman-Stetson vs 1-Beckert-Smith | ||
3 NT | S | 4 | 630 | 2.63 | 1.38 | 3-Mendell-Stedman vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw | ||
3 NT | S | 3 | 600 | 0.13 | 3.88 | 4-Halberg-Gain vs 5-Larsen-Richardson | ||
3 NT | S | 4 | 630 | 2.63 | 1.38 | 5-Juarez-Cohen vs 2-Larkin-Conklin |
control 12
Board 13 North Deals Both Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 5♦; NS 3♠; EW 3♥; NS 4♣; Par +500: EW 5♥×−2
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
4 ♥ | W | −1 | 100 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 1-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw | ||
3 ♥ | W | 4 | 170 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 2-Waterman-Stetson vs 5-Larsen-Richardson | ||
3 ♠ | S | −1 | 100 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 3-Mendell-Stedman vs 2-Larkin-Conklin | ||
2 ♥ | W | 3 | 140 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 4-Halberg-Gain vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert | ||
5 ♦ | N | 5 | 600 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 5-Juarez-Cohen vs 1-Beckert-Smith |
control 13
Board 14 East Deals None Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 3♠; NS 2N; NS 2♦; EW 1♣; Par +140
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
1 NT | N | 2 | 120 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw | ||
2 ♠ | N | 2 | 110 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 2-Waterman-Stetson vs 5-Larsen-Richardson | ||
1 NT | W | −2 | 100 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 3-Mendell-Stedman vs 2-Larkin-Conklin | ||
2 ♠ | N | 3 | 140 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 4-Halberg-Gain vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert | ||
2 ♠ | N | 5 | 200 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 5-Juarez-Cohen vs 1-Beckert-Smith |
control 14
Board 15 South Deals N-S Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 3♥; NS 2N; S 3♣; W 2♦; N 2♣; NS 1♠; E 1♦; Par +140
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
3 ♠ | S | −1 | 100 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 1-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw | ||
4 ♥ | S | −1 | 100 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 2-Waterman-Stetson vs 5-Larsen-Richardson | ||
4 ♥ | N | −1 | 100 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 3-Mendell-Stedman vs 2-Larkin-Conklin | ||
2 ♦ | W | −2 | 100 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 4-Halberg-Gain vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert | ||
2 ♥ | S | 2 | 110 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 5-Juarez-Cohen vs 1-Beckert-Smith |
control 15
Board 16 West Deals E-W Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
E 3♥; NS 4♣; EW 2N; NS 2♠; W 2♥; EW 1♦; Par +130
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
4 ♥ | E | −1 | 100 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 1-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw | ||
2 ♠ | S | −2 | 100 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2-Waterman-Stetson vs 5-Larsen-Richardson | ||
4 ♥ | W | 4 | 620 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 3-Mendell-Stedman vs 2-Larkin-Conklin | ||
2 ♥ | E | 2 | 110 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 4-Halberg-Gain vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert | ||
4 ♥ | E | −2 | 200 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 5-Juarez-Cohen vs 1-Beckert-Smith |
control 16
Board 17 North Deals None Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
S 2N; EW 2♠; N 1N; NS 2♦; EW 1♥; EW 1♣; Par +100: EW 3♠×−1
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
3 ♦ | N | −1 | 50 | 0.50 | 3.50 | 1-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 2-Larkin-Conklin | ||
1 NT | S | 2 | 120 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 2-Waterman-Stetson vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert | ||
1 ♦ | N | 2 | 90 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 3-Mendell-Stedman vs 1-Beckert-Smith | ||
3 ♦ | N | 3 | 110 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 4-Halberg-Gain vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw | ||
3 NT | N | −1 | 50 | 0.50 | 3.50 | 5-Juarez-Cohen vs 5-Larsen-Richardson |
control 17
Board 18 East Deals N-S Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EW 5♥; EW 2N; NS 2♠; NS 3♦; EW 2♣; Par −450
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
4 ♥ | E | 4 | 420 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 1-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 2-Larkin-Conklin | ||
2 ♥ | E | 4 | 170 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 2-Waterman-Stetson vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert | ||
2 ♣ | N | −1 | 100 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 3-Mendell-Stedman vs 1-Beckert-Smith | ||
4 ♥ | E | 4 | 420 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 4-Halberg-Gain vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw | ||
4 ♥ | E | 5 | 450 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 5-Juarez-Cohen vs 5-Larsen-Richardson |
control 18
Board 19 South Deals E-W Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 5♠; NS 4♥; NS 3N; NS 2♦; NS 1♣; Par +450
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
3 NT | N | 3 | 400 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 2-Larkin-Conklin | ||
3 NT | N | −1 | 50 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 2-Waterman-Stetson vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert | ||
2 ♥ | S | 4 | 170 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 3-Mendell-Stedman vs 1-Beckert-Smith | ||
4 ♠ | S | 5 | 450 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 4-Halberg-Gain vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw | ||
4 ♠ | S | 5 | 450 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 5-Juarez-Cohen vs 5-Larsen-Richardson |
control 19
Board 20 West Deals Both Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EW 4N; EW 4♠; EW 4♥; EW 5♣; EW 3♦; Par −630
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
3 NT | W | 4 | 630 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 1-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 2-Larkin-Conklin | ||
3 NT | W | 3 | 600 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2-Waterman-Stetson vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert | ||
3 ♣ | W | 4 | 130 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 3-Mendell-Stedman vs 1-Beckert-Smith | ||
3 NT | W | 3 | 600 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 4-Halberg-Gain vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw | ||
3 NT | W | 3 | 600 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 5-Juarez-Cohen vs 5-Larsen-Richardson |
control 20
control 21
control 22
control 23
control 24
control 25
control 26
control 27
control 28