Thursday Evening Pairs Thursday Eve Session February 13, 2014
Scores after  5 rounds  Average:   40.0      Section  A  North-South
Pair    Pct   Score  Rank   HNDCP   Total  Rank   MPs
  1   54.85   43.88   1     10.73   54.61   1    0.48     Nan Halberg - Rich Gain
  4   50.50   40.40         12.99   53.39   2    0.17     Robert Rottmayer - Kenneth Koutz
  3   52.98   42.38   2     10.74   53.12        0.34     Nancy Stetson - Barbara Uhl
  2   48.29   38.63         11.76   50.39                 Ann Waterman - Doris Mendell
  5   45.79   36.63          9.05   45.68                 Conrad Larkin - Jan Conklin
  6   47.54   38.03  NE     11.84   49.87                 Gordon Larsen - Nancy Gunn

Thursday Evening Pairs Thursday Eve Session February 13, 2014
Scores after  5 rounds  Average:   40.0      Section  A  East-West
Pair    Pct   Score  Rank   HNDCP   Total  Rank   MPs
  1   57.66   46.13   1      7.57   53.70   1    0.48     Karen Rice - Donna Soehrens
  6   51.89   41.51   2     10.02   51.53   2    0.34     Ted Johnson - Larry Soley
  3   51.56   41.25          6.20   47.45                 Nilesh Gheewala - Kathy Juarez
  2   40.30   32.24         11.79   44.03                 Linda Thomason - Jane Bender
  5   32.83   26.26         15.46   41.72                 Jeannette Mottet - Lynn Almirol
  4   66.11   52.89  NE      0.00   52.89                 Kate Hill - Randy Randolph



1401213EE#1

Board 1
North Deals
None Vul
Q
Q 9 2
A K J 9 2
K 5 3 2
A 7
A 10 7 5 4 3
Q 4
A Q J
N
WE
S
10 6 5 4
6
5 3
10 9 8 7 6 4
K J 9 8 3 2
K J 8
10 8 7 6

NS 3N; NS 3♠; NS 3; EW 3♣; NS 1; Par +100: EW 4♣×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 N41300.004.001-Halberg-Gain vs 1-Rice-Soehrens
4 NTW−63002.002.003-Stetson-Uhl vs 4-Hill-Randolph
4 ×W−614004.000.004-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 6-Johnson-Soley
3 ♠S41701.003.005-Larkin-Conklin vs 3-Gheewala-Juarez
5 N54003.001.006-Larsen-Gunn vs 5-Mottet-Almirol

control 1


1401213EE#1

Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul
Q 9
A 8
K 9 8 4
J 10 8 7 6
J 10 8 7 2
9 5 3
10 7
K 5 3
N
WE
S
K
Q J 10 6 4 2
J 5 2
Q 9 4
A 6 5 4 3
K 7
A Q 6 3
A 2

NS 6; NS 3N; NS 5♣; NS 3♠; Par +1370

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTN−11001.502.501-Halberg-Gain vs 1-Rice-Soehrens
4 ♠×S−25000.004.003-Stetson-Uhl vs 4-Hill-Randolph
3 NTS−11001.502.504-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 6-Johnson-Soley
2 ♠S21103.001.005-Larkin-Conklin vs 3-Gheewala-Juarez
3 NTS36004.000.006-Larsen-Gunn vs 5-Mottet-Almirol

control 2


1401213EE#1

Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul
A J 7 4
J 10 5 4 3
A 3
A J
10 6
K 8
K 10 8 6 4
8 7 6 5
N
WE
S
K Q 5 3 2
Q 7 2
Q J 9
9 4
9 8
A 9 6
7 5 2
K Q 10 3 2

NS 4; NS 2N; NS 3♣; NS 1♠; Par +420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 N52003.001.001-Halberg-Gain vs 1-Rice-Soehrens
4 N−1500.004.003-Stetson-Uhl vs 4-Hill-Randolph
2 N31401.502.504-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 6-Johnson-Soley
4 N44204.000.005-Larkin-Conklin vs 3-Gheewala-Juarez
2 N31401.502.506-Larsen-Gunn vs 5-Mottet-Almirol

control 3


1401213EE#1

Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul
A J 2
K Q J
K 10 6 5
K 9 2
Q 8 6
A 6 4 2
A Q 3 2
A 3
N
WE
S
K 9 7 5 4 3
10 9 7
7
Q 10 6
10
8 5 3
J 9 8 4
J 8 7 5 4

W 4♠; E 3♠; EW 2; EW 1N; NS 2; NS 2♣; Par −620

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠×W−38004.000.001-Halberg-Gain vs 1-Rice-Soehrens
2 ♠W31400.004.003-Stetson-Uhl vs 4-Hill-Randolph
3 NTW−22003.001.004-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 6-Johnson-Soley
2 ♠W21101.003.005-Larkin-Conklin vs 3-Gheewala-Juarez
3 ♠W−11002.002.006-Larsen-Gunn vs 5-Mottet-Almirol

control 4


1401213EE#1

Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul
Q J 6 2
Q J 8 7 3
K 3
7 6
A K 9
A K 5
9 7 2
J 10 8 5
N
WE
S
8 7 5 4 3
6 4 2
Q J 5
9 2
10
10 9
A 10 8 6 4
A K Q 4 3

NS 3; NS 3♣; NS 1N; NS 2; NS 1♠; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♣S−11001.003.001-Halberg-Gain vs 6-Johnson-Soley
2 NTN21203.001.002-Waterman-Mendell vs 2-Thomason-Bender
2 ♠E−21002.002.004-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 5-Mottet-Almirol
3 S−22000.004.005-Larkin-Conklin vs 1-Rice-Soehrens
4 ♠×E−48004.000.006-Larsen-Gunn vs 4-Hill-Randolph

control 5


1401213EE#1

Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul
J 8 6
J 8 6 5 4
K Q J
A 7
10 9 5 4 3 2
A 3
A 8
K 10 8
N
WE
S
A 7
Q 10 7 2
5 4 3
J 9 5 4
K Q
K 9
10 9 7 6 2
Q 6 3 2

EW 2♠; NS 2; NS 1; EW 1♣; Par −100: NS 3×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 N−31500.004.001-Halberg-Gain vs 6-Johnson-Soley
2 ♠W−11003.500.502-Waterman-Mendell vs 2-Thomason-Bender
1 NTS−1501.003.004-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 5-Mottet-Almirol
2 S2902.002.005-Larkin-Conklin vs 1-Rice-Soehrens
2 ♠W−11003.500.506-Larsen-Gunn vs 4-Hill-Randolph

control 6


1401213EE#1

Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul
K Q 7 6 5
Q 7 5
K 5
10 4 3
A
K J 9 6 3 2
10 8
Q 9 8 6
N
WE
S
J 4 2
A 10 8
A 4 3 2
A 7 2
10 9 8 3
4
Q J 9 7 6
K J 5

EW 5; EW 3N; EW 4♣; NS 1♠; Par −650

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 W46200.503.501-Halberg-Gain vs 6-Johnson-Soley
3 ♠N41703.500.502-Waterman-Mendell vs 2-Thomason-Bender
3 ♠N41703.500.504-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 5-Mottet-Almirol
4 W46200.503.505-Larkin-Conklin vs 1-Rice-Soehrens
4 ♠×N−12002.002.006-Larsen-Gunn vs 4-Hill-Randolph

control 7


1401213EE#1

Board 8
West Deals
None Vul
A J 7
A K 10 6
9 2
A Q 9 8
Q 10 8
7 5
A 10 7 4 3
K 3 2
N
WE
S
6 4 2
9 4 3
Q J 8 6 5
5 4
K 9 5 3
Q J 8 2
K
J 10 7 6

NS 6♠; NS 6; NS 6♣; NS 2N; NS 1; Par +980

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S64803.880.131-Halberg-Gain vs 6-Johnson-Soley
4 ♠N54501.382.632-Waterman-Mendell vs 2-Thomason-Bender
4 S54501.382.634-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 5-Mottet-Almirol
4 S54501.382.635-Larkin-Conklin vs 1-Rice-Soehrens

control 8


1401213EE#1

Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul
Q 10 8 5 3 2
5
8 5 2
Q 6 3
A J 6 4 3
A K 10 7 3
A J 7
N
WE
S
A K
K 10 9 2
9 4
10 8 5 4 2
J 9 7 6 4
Q 8 7
Q J 6
K 9

EW 7; EW 6N; EW 6♣; EW 5; EW 1♠; Par −1700: NS 7♠×−7

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 W56503.001.001-Halberg-Gain vs 5-Mottet-Almirol
4 W77100.004.002-Waterman-Mendell vs 1-Rice-Soehrens
4 W66801.502.503-Stetson-Uhl vs 3-Gheewala-Juarez
4 ♠S−31504.000.005-Larkin-Conklin vs 6-Johnson-Soley
5 W66801.502.506-Larsen-Gunn vs 2-Thomason-Bender

control 9


1401213EE#1

Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul
Q 7 5 3
A 5
A 7 4
7 6 5 3
A 10
9 8 6 3 2
K Q 6 5 3
2
N
WE
S
K 9 4 2
10 4
J 10 9 8 2
Q J
J 8 6
K Q J 7
A K 10 9 8 4

NS 5N; NS 3♠; NS 4♣; EW 3; NS 1; Par +660

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 ♣S56003.001.001-Halberg-Gain vs 5-Mottet-Almirol
3 NTN56604.000.002-Waterman-Mendell vs 1-Rice-Soehrens
5 ×W−25002.002.003-Stetson-Uhl vs 3-Gheewala-Juarez
3 ♣S61701.003.005-Larkin-Conklin vs 6-Johnson-Soley
3 ♣S41300.004.006-Larsen-Gunn vs 2-Thomason-Bender

control 10


1401213EE#1

Board 11
South Deals
None Vul
A J 10 6 2
K 10 8 3
K 4 3
A
Q 5
A Q J 9 7 4
J 10 8 5
J
N
WE
S
7 3
5
Q 9 7 6
K 9 7 6 3 2
K 9 8 4
6 2
A 2
Q 10 8 5 4

NS 5♠; NS 3N; NS 2; NS 2♣; NS 1; Par +450

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠N44201.003.001-Halberg-Gain vs 5-Mottet-Almirol
4 ♠N64804.000.002-Waterman-Mendell vs 1-Rice-Soehrens
4 ♠N54503.001.003-Stetson-Uhl vs 3-Gheewala-Juarez
4 ♠N44201.003.005-Larkin-Conklin vs 6-Johnson-Soley
4 ♠N44201.003.006-Larsen-Gunn vs 2-Thomason-Bender

control 11


1401213EE#1

Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul
A K 3
A Q J 9
A J
A K 5 2
Q J 5
7 5 4
4 2
Q 9 8 7 6
N
WE
S
9 8 6 2
3
K 7 6 5 3
J 4 3
10 7 4
K 10 8 6 2
Q 10 9 8
10

NS 6N; NS 6; NS 4♠; NS 4; NS 2♣; Par +1440

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTN66903.500.501-Halberg-Gain vs 5-Mottet-Almirol
6 NTN−11000.004.002-Waterman-Mendell vs 1-Rice-Soehrens
3 NTN56601.502.503-Stetson-Uhl vs 3-Gheewala-Juarez
3 NTN56601.502.505-Larkin-Conklin vs 6-Johnson-Soley
3 NTN66903.500.506-Larsen-Gunn vs 2-Thomason-Bender

control 12


1401213EE#1

Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul
6
10 7 5
Q J 9 5
10 9 7 5 4
A 10 7 4
Q 9 6 4 3 2
7
A 3
N
WE
S
J 9 5 2
K J 8
8 6 4 3 2
8
K Q 8 3
A
A K 10
K Q J 6 2

NS 5♣; EW 2♠; EW 2; S 3; N 2; Par +600

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♣S51503.001.001-Halberg-Gain vs 3-Gheewala-Juarez
4 ♣S51503.001.002-Waterman-Mendell vs 6-Johnson-Soley
3 ♣S51503.001.003-Stetson-Uhl vs 2-Thomason-Bender
5 ♣S−11000.503.504-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 4-Hill-Randolph
5 N−11000.503.506-Larsen-Gunn vs 1-Rice-Soehrens

control 13


1401213EE#1

Board 14
East Deals
None Vul
10 8 6
A 8 7
A K J 6 5 3 2
7 3
Q J
K 10 9 6 5 3 2
Q 7
N
WE
S
K Q 8 6 4
9 5 4 2
Q
9 8 4
A J 10 9 5 2
A K 7 3
J 4
10

NS 6N; NS 6; NS 6♣; NS 4♠; NS 1; Par +990

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTN64904.000.001-Halberg-Gain vs 3-Gheewala-Juarez
5 ♣N64201.003.002-Waterman-Mendell vs 6-Johnson-Soley
4 S44201.003.003-Stetson-Uhl vs 2-Thomason-Bender
4 ♠S44201.003.004-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 4-Hill-Randolph
3 NTN54603.001.006-Larsen-Gunn vs 1-Rice-Soehrens

control 14


1401213EE#1

Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul
Q J 7 2
4 3
Q J 10 5 3
9 2
A K 4 3
K J 10 6 5 2
K
8 4
N
WE
S
9 6 5
Q 7
A 9 8 7 4 2
6 3
10 8
A 9 8
6
A K Q J 10 7 5

NS 2N; EW 2; NS 2♣; EW 1♠; EW 1; Par +100: EW 3×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 W31401.502.501-Halberg-Gain vs 3-Gheewala-Juarez
3 W31401.502.502-Waterman-Mendell vs 6-Johnson-Soley
4 ♣S−11003.001.003-Stetson-Uhl vs 2-Thomason-Bender
3 ♣×S48704.000.004-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 4-Hill-Randolph
5 ♣S−33000.004.006-Larsen-Gunn vs 1-Rice-Soehrens

control 15


1401213EE#1

Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul
Q 7 4
8 7 6 4
Q J
J 7 6 3
A J 10 8
Q 3
A 10 5 4
A 10 9
N
WE
S
9 5 2
A K J 10
K 9 8 7 6
5
K 6 3
9 5 2
3 2
K Q 8 4 2

EW 6♠; EW 6; EW 5N; EW 5; EW 2♣; Par −1430

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW56600.503.501-Halberg-Gain vs 3-Gheewala-Juarez
1 NTW52104.000.002-Waterman-Mendell vs 6-Johnson-Soley
3 NTW36003.001.003-Stetson-Uhl vs 2-Thomason-Bender
3 NTW46302.002.004-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 4-Hill-Randolph
3 NTW56600.503.506-Larsen-Gunn vs 1-Rice-Soehrens

control 16


1401213EE#1

Board 17
North Deals
None Vul
8 6 3 2
10 2
9 7 3
K Q 6 3
A K 10 5
A Q J 5 3
J
J 9 4
N
WE
S
Q 4
K 9
K 10 8 6
A 10 8 7 2
J 9 7
8 7 6 4
A Q 5 4 2
5

EW 6; EW 5N; EW 5♠; EW 5♣; EW 3; Par −980

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 W54503.001.001-Halberg-Gain vs 2-Thomason-Bender
3 NTE54601.003.002-Waterman-Mendell vs 4-Hill-Randolph
3 NTE54601.003.003-Stetson-Uhl vs 1-Rice-Soehrens
5 NTE54601.003.004-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 3-Gheewala-Juarez
2 NTE52104.000.005-Larkin-Conklin vs 5-Mottet-Almirol

control 17


1401213EE#1

Board 18
East Deals
N-S Vul
A 9 8 5 3
K Q 8 6
A 10
J 3
10 6
A 9 7 3
8 6
A Q 10 8 4
N
WE
S
K 7 4 2
J
Q J 9 7
9 6 5 2
Q J
10 5 4 2
K 5 4 3 2
K 7

NS 2; EW 3♣; EW 1N; NS 1♠; Par −110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 ♠N21103.001.001-Halberg-Gain vs 2-Thomason-Bender
3 ♠N−22000.004.002-Waterman-Mendell vs 4-Hill-Randolph
1 NTS1902.002.003-Stetson-Uhl vs 1-Rice-Soehrens
3 ♣E31101.003.004-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 3-Gheewala-Juarez
3 N41704.000.005-Larkin-Conklin vs 5-Mottet-Almirol

control 18


1401213EE#1

Board 19
South Deals
E-W Vul
10 9 4 2
A K 6 3
K J
A 9 6
K J 6 5 3
J 2
5 4 3
K 4 2
N
WE
S
A Q 8 7
Q 8
A Q 2
J 10 5 3
10 9 7 5 4
10 9 8 7 6
Q 8 7

NS 4; EW 3♠; EW 1N; NS 2; EW 1♣; Par +200: EW 4♠×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♠W31400.503.501-Halberg-Gain vs 2-Thomason-Bender
3 ♠E31400.503.502-Waterman-Mendell vs 4-Hill-Randolph
2 N31403.500.503-Stetson-Uhl vs 1-Rice-Soehrens
2 N31403.500.504-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 3-Gheewala-Juarez
3 NTE−11002.002.005-Larkin-Conklin vs 5-Mottet-Almirol

control 19


1401213EE#1

Board 20
West Deals
Both Vul
A 5 2
A 8
10 5 3
A Q J 10 3
Q 10 8 6 3
K Q 9 5
8
9 7 2
N
WE
S
K 7
J 4 3
Q J 7 4 2
8 6 5
J 9 4
10 7 6 2
A K 9 6
K 4

NS 5N; NS 5♣; NS 2; NS 3; NS 1♠; Par +660

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTN46304.000.001-Halberg-Gain vs 2-Thomason-Bender
2 ♣N31101.003.002-Waterman-Mendell vs 4-Hill-Randolph
3 NTN36003.001.003-Stetson-Uhl vs 1-Rice-Soehrens
1 ♠W−11000.004.004-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 3-Gheewala-Juarez
1 NTN41802.002.005-Larkin-Conklin vs 5-Mottet-Almirol

control 20


1401213EE#1

Board 21
North Deals
N-S Vul
Q 10 7 6
J 4 2
8
K Q 8 6 5
K 4
8 7
A Q 10 6
A J 10 3 2
N
WE
S
J 8 3 2
K 10 9 6 3
7 5 4 2
A 9 5
A Q 5
K J 9 3
9 7 4

S 3N; N 2N; EW 3; S 3♣; N 2♣; NS 1♠; EW 1; Par +100: EW 4×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 ♣W−31502.501.502-Waterman-Mendell vs 3-Gheewala-Juarez
2 NTW−31502.501.503-Stetson-Uhl vs 5-Mottet-Almirol
2 NTW−42004.000.004-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 2-Thomason-Bender
3 ♠N−11000.004.005-Larkin-Conklin vs 4-Hill-Randolph
2 NTW−21001.003.006-Larsen-Gunn vs 6-Johnson-Soley

control 21


1401213EE#1

Board 22
East Deals
E-W Vul
9 4
10 6
10 8 4 2
8 7 6 4 3
K 8 3
J 7
A J 7 3
A Q 9 5
N
WE
S
A J 10
8 5 2
K Q 9 5
K 10 2
Q 7 6 5 2
A K Q 9 4 3
6
J

EW 5; NS 2; EW 3♣; EW 1N; EW 1♠; Par −500: NS 5×−3

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW−22004.000.002-Waterman-Mendell vs 3-Gheewala-Juarez
4 E−11003.001.003-Stetson-Uhl vs 5-Mottet-Almirol
3 S−21001.502.504-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 2-Thomason-Bender
5 ×E57500.004.005-Larkin-Conklin vs 4-Hill-Randolph
4 ×S−11001.502.506-Larsen-Gunn vs 6-Johnson-Soley

control 22


1401213EE#1

Board 23
South Deals
Both Vul
A 4 3
5 3
10 7 4
A 9 8 7 2
K 9 8
K Q 9 8
9 5
K Q 10 4
N
WE
S
Q J 10 5 2
J 6 4
A 6 3 2
J
7 6
A 10 7 2
K Q J 8
6 5 3

EW 2♠; EW 2; EW 1N; NS 1♣; Par −110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTW41800.004.002-Waterman-Mendell vs 3-Gheewala-Juarez
2 ♠E−11003.500.503-Stetson-Uhl vs 5-Mottet-Almirol
2 N2902.002.004-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 2-Thomason-Bender
4 ♠E−11003.500.505-Larkin-Conklin vs 4-Hill-Randolph
1 NTW21201.003.006-Larsen-Gunn vs 6-Johnson-Soley

control 23


1401213EE#1

Board 24
West Deals
None Vul
8 5
Q 2
Q J 10 9 4
A 8 7 6
7 2
J 10 5 3
7 2
K J 10 5 3
N
WE
S
A K Q 9
A K 9 7
A 8
Q 9 4
J 10 6 4 3
8 6 4
K 6 5 3
2

EW 5; EW 5♣; EW 3♠; EW 2N; NS 1; Par −450

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTE64900.753.252-Waterman-Mendell vs 3-Gheewala-Juarez
2 NTE21203.880.133-Stetson-Uhl vs 5-Mottet-Almirol
5 NTE64900.753.255-Larkin-Conklin vs 4-Hill-Randolph
3 NTE34002.631.386-Larsen-Gunn vs 6-Johnson-Soley

control 24


1401213EE#1

control 25


1401213EE#1

control 26


1401213EE#1

control 27


1401213EE#1

control 28