Thursday Evening Pairs Thursday Eve Session February 13, 2014 Scores after 5 rounds Average: 40.0 Section A North-South Pair Pct Score Rank HNDCP Total Rank MPs 1 54.85 43.88 1 10.73 54.61 1 0.48 Nan Halberg - Rich Gain 4 50.50 40.40 12.99 53.39 2 0.17 Robert Rottmayer - Kenneth Koutz 3 52.98 42.38 2 10.74 53.12 0.34 Nancy Stetson - Barbara Uhl 2 48.29 38.63 11.76 50.39 Ann Waterman - Doris Mendell 5 45.79 36.63 9.05 45.68 Conrad Larkin - Jan Conklin 6 47.54 38.03 NE 11.84 49.87 Gordon Larsen - Nancy Gunn Thursday Evening Pairs Thursday Eve Session February 13, 2014 Scores after 5 rounds Average: 40.0 Section A East-West Pair Pct Score Rank HNDCP Total Rank MPs 1 57.66 46.13 1 7.57 53.70 1 0.48 Karen Rice - Donna Soehrens 6 51.89 41.51 2 10.02 51.53 2 0.34 Ted Johnson - Larry Soley 3 51.56 41.25 6.20 47.45 Nilesh Gheewala - Kathy Juarez 2 40.30 32.24 11.79 44.03 Linda Thomason - Jane Bender 5 32.83 26.26 15.46 41.72 Jeannette Mottet - Lynn Almirol 4 66.11 52.89 NE 0.00 52.89 Kate Hill - Randy Randolph
Board 1 North Deals None Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 3N; NS 3♠; NS 3♦; EW 3♣; NS 1♥; Par +100: EW 4♣×−1
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
3 ♦ | N | 4 | 130 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 1-Halberg-Gain vs 1-Rice-Soehrens | ||
4 NT | W | −6 | 300 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 3-Stetson-Uhl vs 4-Hill-Randolph | ||
4 ♥× | W | −6 | 1400 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 4-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 6-Johnson-Soley | ||
3 ♠ | S | 4 | 170 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 5-Larkin-Conklin vs 3-Gheewala-Juarez | ||
5 ♦ | N | 5 | 400 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 6-Larsen-Gunn vs 5-Mottet-Almirol |
control 1
Board 2 East Deals N-S Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 6♦; NS 3N; NS 5♣; NS 3♠; Par +1370
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
3 NT | N | −1 | 100 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 1-Halberg-Gain vs 1-Rice-Soehrens | ||
4 ♠× | S | −2 | 500 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 3-Stetson-Uhl vs 4-Hill-Randolph | ||
3 NT | S | −1 | 100 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 4-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 6-Johnson-Soley | ||
2 ♠ | S | 2 | 110 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 5-Larkin-Conklin vs 3-Gheewala-Juarez | ||
3 NT | S | 3 | 600 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 6-Larsen-Gunn vs 5-Mottet-Almirol |
control 2
Board 3 South Deals E-W Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 4♥; NS 2N; NS 3♣; NS 1♠; Par +420
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
3 ♥ | N | 5 | 200 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 1-Halberg-Gain vs 1-Rice-Soehrens | ||
4 ♥ | N | −1 | 50 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 3-Stetson-Uhl vs 4-Hill-Randolph | ||
2 ♥ | N | 3 | 140 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 4-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 6-Johnson-Soley | ||
4 ♥ | N | 4 | 420 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 5-Larkin-Conklin vs 3-Gheewala-Juarez | ||
2 ♥ | N | 3 | 140 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 6-Larsen-Gunn vs 5-Mottet-Almirol |
control 3
Board 4 West Deals Both Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
W 4♠; E 3♠; EW 2♥; EW 1N; NS 2♦; NS 2♣; Par −620
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
4 ♠× | W | −3 | 800 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 1-Halberg-Gain vs 1-Rice-Soehrens | ||
2 ♠ | W | 3 | 140 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 3-Stetson-Uhl vs 4-Hill-Randolph | ||
3 NT | W | −2 | 200 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 4-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 6-Johnson-Soley | ||
2 ♠ | W | 2 | 110 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 5-Larkin-Conklin vs 3-Gheewala-Juarez | ||
3 ♠ | W | −1 | 100 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 6-Larsen-Gunn vs 5-Mottet-Almirol |
control 4
Board 5 North Deals N-S Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 3♥; NS 3♣; NS 1N; NS 2♦; NS 1♠; Par +140
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
3 ♣ | S | −1 | 100 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 1-Halberg-Gain vs 6-Johnson-Soley | ||
2 NT | N | 2 | 120 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 2-Waterman-Mendell vs 2-Thomason-Bender | ||
2 ♠ | E | −2 | 100 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 4-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 5-Mottet-Almirol | ||
3 ♦ | S | −2 | 200 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 5-Larkin-Conklin vs 1-Rice-Soehrens | ||
4 ♠× | E | −4 | 800 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 6-Larsen-Gunn vs 4-Hill-Randolph |
control 5
Board 6 East Deals E-W Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EW 2♠; NS 2♦; NS 1♥; EW 1♣; Par −100: NS 3♦×−1
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
4 ♥ | N | −3 | 150 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 1-Halberg-Gain vs 6-Johnson-Soley | ||
2 ♠ | W | −1 | 100 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 2-Waterman-Mendell vs 2-Thomason-Bender | ||
1 NT | S | −1 | 50 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 4-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 5-Mottet-Almirol | ||
2 ♦ | S | 2 | 90 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 5-Larkin-Conklin vs 1-Rice-Soehrens | ||
2 ♠ | W | −1 | 100 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 6-Larsen-Gunn vs 4-Hill-Randolph |
control 6
Board 7 South Deals Both Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EW 5♥; EW 3N; EW 4♣; NS 1♠; Par −650
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
4 ♥ | W | 4 | 620 | 0.50 | 3.50 | 1-Halberg-Gain vs 6-Johnson-Soley | ||
3 ♠ | N | 4 | 170 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 2-Waterman-Mendell vs 2-Thomason-Bender | ||
3 ♠ | N | 4 | 170 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 4-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 5-Mottet-Almirol | ||
4 ♥ | W | 4 | 620 | 0.50 | 3.50 | 5-Larkin-Conklin vs 1-Rice-Soehrens | ||
4 ♠× | N | −1 | 200 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 6-Larsen-Gunn vs 4-Hill-Randolph |
control 7
Board 8 West Deals None Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 6♠; NS 6♥; NS 6♣; NS 2N; NS 1♦; Par +980
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
4 ♥ | S | 6 | 480 | 3.88 | 0.13 | 1-Halberg-Gain vs 6-Johnson-Soley | ||
4 ♠ | N | 5 | 450 | 1.38 | 2.63 | 2-Waterman-Mendell vs 2-Thomason-Bender | ||
4 ♥ | S | 5 | 450 | 1.38 | 2.63 | 4-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 5-Mottet-Almirol | ||
4 ♥ | S | 5 | 450 | 1.38 | 2.63 | 5-Larkin-Conklin vs 1-Rice-Soehrens |
control 8
Board 9 North Deals E-W Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EW 7♥; EW 6N; EW 6♣; EW 5♦; EW 1♠; Par −1700: NS 7♠×−7
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
4 ♥ | W | 5 | 650 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 1-Halberg-Gain vs 5-Mottet-Almirol | ||
4 ♥ | W | 7 | 710 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 2-Waterman-Mendell vs 1-Rice-Soehrens | ||
4 ♥ | W | 6 | 680 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 3-Stetson-Uhl vs 3-Gheewala-Juarez | ||
4 ♠ | S | −3 | 150 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 5-Larkin-Conklin vs 6-Johnson-Soley | ||
5 ♥ | W | 6 | 680 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 6-Larsen-Gunn vs 2-Thomason-Bender |
control 9
Board 10 East Deals Both Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 5N; NS 3♠; NS 4♣; EW 3♦; NS 1♥; Par +660
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
5 ♣ | S | 5 | 600 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 1-Halberg-Gain vs 5-Mottet-Almirol | ||
3 NT | N | 5 | 660 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 2-Waterman-Mendell vs 1-Rice-Soehrens | ||
5 ♦× | W | −2 | 500 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 3-Stetson-Uhl vs 3-Gheewala-Juarez | ||
3 ♣ | S | 6 | 170 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 5-Larkin-Conklin vs 6-Johnson-Soley | ||
3 ♣ | S | 4 | 130 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 6-Larsen-Gunn vs 2-Thomason-Bender |
control 10
Board 11 South Deals None Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 5♠; NS 3N; NS 2♥; NS 2♣; NS 1♦; Par +450
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
4 ♠ | N | 4 | 420 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 1-Halberg-Gain vs 5-Mottet-Almirol | ||
4 ♠ | N | 6 | 480 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 2-Waterman-Mendell vs 1-Rice-Soehrens | ||
4 ♠ | N | 5 | 450 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 3-Stetson-Uhl vs 3-Gheewala-Juarez | ||
4 ♠ | N | 4 | 420 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 5-Larkin-Conklin vs 6-Johnson-Soley | ||
4 ♠ | N | 4 | 420 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 6-Larsen-Gunn vs 2-Thomason-Bender |
control 11
Board 12 West Deals N-S Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 6N; NS 6♥; NS 4♠; NS 4♦; NS 2♣; Par +1440
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
3 NT | N | 6 | 690 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 1-Halberg-Gain vs 5-Mottet-Almirol | ||
6 NT | N | −1 | 100 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 2-Waterman-Mendell vs 1-Rice-Soehrens | ||
3 NT | N | 5 | 660 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 3-Stetson-Uhl vs 3-Gheewala-Juarez | ||
3 NT | N | 5 | 660 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 5-Larkin-Conklin vs 6-Johnson-Soley | ||
3 NT | N | 6 | 690 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 6-Larsen-Gunn vs 2-Thomason-Bender |
control 12
Board 13 North Deals Both Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 5♣; EW 2♠; EW 2♥; S 3♦; N 2♦; Par +600
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
4 ♣ | S | 5 | 150 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 1-Halberg-Gain vs 3-Gheewala-Juarez | ||
4 ♣ | S | 5 | 150 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 2-Waterman-Mendell vs 6-Johnson-Soley | ||
3 ♣ | S | 5 | 150 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 3-Stetson-Uhl vs 2-Thomason-Bender | ||
5 ♣ | S | −1 | 100 | 0.50 | 3.50 | 4-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 4-Hill-Randolph | ||
5 ♦ | N | −1 | 100 | 0.50 | 3.50 | 6-Larsen-Gunn vs 1-Rice-Soehrens |
control 13
Board 14 East Deals None Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 6N; NS 6♥; NS 6♣; NS 4♠; NS 1♦; Par +990
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
3 NT | N | 6 | 490 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 1-Halberg-Gain vs 3-Gheewala-Juarez | ||
5 ♣ | N | 6 | 420 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 2-Waterman-Mendell vs 6-Johnson-Soley | ||
4 ♥ | S | 4 | 420 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 3-Stetson-Uhl vs 2-Thomason-Bender | ||
4 ♠ | S | 4 | 420 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 4-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 4-Hill-Randolph | ||
3 NT | N | 5 | 460 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 6-Larsen-Gunn vs 1-Rice-Soehrens |
control 14
Board 15 South Deals N-S Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 2N; EW 2♥; NS 2♣; EW 1♠; EW 1♦; Par +100: EW 3♥×−1
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
3 ♥ | W | 3 | 140 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 1-Halberg-Gain vs 3-Gheewala-Juarez | ||
3 ♥ | W | 3 | 140 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 2-Waterman-Mendell vs 6-Johnson-Soley | ||
4 ♣ | S | −1 | 100 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 3-Stetson-Uhl vs 2-Thomason-Bender | ||
3 ♣× | S | 4 | 870 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 4-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 4-Hill-Randolph | ||
5 ♣ | S | −3 | 300 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 6-Larsen-Gunn vs 1-Rice-Soehrens |
control 15
Board 16 West Deals E-W Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EW 6♠; EW 6♦; EW 5N; EW 5♥; EW 2♣; Par −1430
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
3 NT | W | 5 | 660 | 0.50 | 3.50 | 1-Halberg-Gain vs 3-Gheewala-Juarez | ||
1 NT | W | 5 | 210 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 2-Waterman-Mendell vs 6-Johnson-Soley | ||
3 NT | W | 3 | 600 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 3-Stetson-Uhl vs 2-Thomason-Bender | ||
3 NT | W | 4 | 630 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 4-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 4-Hill-Randolph | ||
3 NT | W | 5 | 660 | 0.50 | 3.50 | 6-Larsen-Gunn vs 1-Rice-Soehrens |
control 16
Board 17 North Deals None Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EW 6♥; EW 5N; EW 5♠; EW 5♣; EW 3♦; Par −980
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
4 ♥ | W | 5 | 450 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 1-Halberg-Gain vs 2-Thomason-Bender | ||
3 NT | E | 5 | 460 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 2-Waterman-Mendell vs 4-Hill-Randolph | ||
3 NT | E | 5 | 460 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 3-Stetson-Uhl vs 1-Rice-Soehrens | ||
5 NT | E | 5 | 460 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 4-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 3-Gheewala-Juarez | ||
2 NT | E | 5 | 210 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 5-Larkin-Conklin vs 5-Mottet-Almirol |
control 17
Board 18 East Deals N-S Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 2♥; EW 3♣; EW 1N; NS 1♠; Par −110
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
2 ♠ | N | 2 | 110 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 1-Halberg-Gain vs 2-Thomason-Bender | ||
3 ♠ | N | −2 | 200 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 2-Waterman-Mendell vs 4-Hill-Randolph | ||
1 NT | S | 1 | 90 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 3-Stetson-Uhl vs 1-Rice-Soehrens | ||
3 ♣ | E | 3 | 110 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 4-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 3-Gheewala-Juarez | ||
3 ♥ | N | 4 | 170 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 5-Larkin-Conklin vs 5-Mottet-Almirol |
control 18
Board 19 South Deals E-W Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 4♥; EW 3♠; EW 1N; NS 2♦; EW 1♣; Par +200: EW 4♠×−1
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
3 ♠ | W | 3 | 140 | 0.50 | 3.50 | 1-Halberg-Gain vs 2-Thomason-Bender | ||
3 ♠ | E | 3 | 140 | 0.50 | 3.50 | 2-Waterman-Mendell vs 4-Hill-Randolph | ||
2 ♥ | N | 3 | 140 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 3-Stetson-Uhl vs 1-Rice-Soehrens | ||
2 ♥ | N | 3 | 140 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 4-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 3-Gheewala-Juarez | ||
3 NT | E | −1 | 100 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 5-Larkin-Conklin vs 5-Mottet-Almirol |
control 19
Board 20 West Deals Both Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 5N; NS 5♣; NS 2♥; NS 3♦; NS 1♠; Par +660
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
3 NT | N | 4 | 630 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 1-Halberg-Gain vs 2-Thomason-Bender | ||
2 ♣ | N | 3 | 110 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 2-Waterman-Mendell vs 4-Hill-Randolph | ||
3 NT | N | 3 | 600 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 3-Stetson-Uhl vs 1-Rice-Soehrens | ||
1 ♠ | W | −1 | 100 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 4-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 3-Gheewala-Juarez | ||
1 NT | N | 4 | 180 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 5-Larkin-Conklin vs 5-Mottet-Almirol |
control 20
Board 21 North Deals N-S Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
S 3N; N 2N; EW 3♦; S 3♣; N 2♣; NS 1♠; EW 1♥; Par +100: EW 4♦×−1
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
2 ♣ | W | −3 | 150 | 2.50 | 1.50 | 2-Waterman-Mendell vs 3-Gheewala-Juarez | ||
2 NT | W | −3 | 150 | 2.50 | 1.50 | 3-Stetson-Uhl vs 5-Mottet-Almirol | ||
2 NT | W | −4 | 200 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 4-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 2-Thomason-Bender | ||
3 ♠ | N | −1 | 100 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 5-Larkin-Conklin vs 4-Hill-Randolph | ||
2 NT | W | −2 | 100 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 6-Larsen-Gunn vs 6-Johnson-Soley |
control 21
Board 22 East Deals E-W Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EW 5♦; NS 2♥; EW 3♣; EW 1N; EW 1♠; Par −500: NS 5♥×−3
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
3 NT | W | −2 | 200 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 2-Waterman-Mendell vs 3-Gheewala-Juarez | ||
4 ♦ | E | −1 | 100 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 3-Stetson-Uhl vs 5-Mottet-Almirol | ||
3 ♥ | S | −2 | 100 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 4-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 2-Thomason-Bender | ||
5 ♦× | E | 5 | 750 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 5-Larkin-Conklin vs 4-Hill-Randolph | ||
4 ♥× | S | −1 | 100 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 6-Larsen-Gunn vs 6-Johnson-Soley |
control 22
Board 23 South Deals Both Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EW 2♠; EW 2♥; EW 1N; NS 1♣; Par −110
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
1 NT | W | 4 | 180 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 2-Waterman-Mendell vs 3-Gheewala-Juarez | ||
2 ♠ | E | −1 | 100 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 3-Stetson-Uhl vs 5-Mottet-Almirol | ||
2 ♦ | N | 2 | 90 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 4-Rottmayer-Koutz vs 2-Thomason-Bender | ||
4 ♠ | E | −1 | 100 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 5-Larkin-Conklin vs 4-Hill-Randolph | ||
1 NT | W | 2 | 120 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 6-Larsen-Gunn vs 6-Johnson-Soley |
control 23
Board 24 West Deals None Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EW 5♥; EW 5♣; EW 3♠; EW 2N; NS 1♦; Par −450
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
3 NT | E | 6 | 490 | 0.75 | 3.25 | 2-Waterman-Mendell vs 3-Gheewala-Juarez | ||
2 NT | E | 2 | 120 | 3.88 | 0.13 | 3-Stetson-Uhl vs 5-Mottet-Almirol | ||
5 NT | E | 6 | 490 | 0.75 | 3.25 | 5-Larkin-Conklin vs 4-Hill-Randolph | ||
3 NT | E | 3 | 400 | 2.63 | 1.38 | 6-Larsen-Gunn vs 6-Johnson-Soley |
control 24
control 25
control 26
control 27
control 28