Thursday Evening Pairs Thursday Eve Session February 6, 2014
Scores after  5 rounds  Average:   40.0      Section  A  North-South
Pair    Pct   Score  Rank   HNDCP   Total  Rank   MPs
  2   64.38   51.50   1      8.73   60.23   1    0.40     Nancy Stetson - Kathy Juarez
  4   43.60   34.88         18.16   53.04   2    0.14     Gus Beckert - Margie Smith
  3   47.04   37.63   2     12.08   49.71        0.28     Ann Waterman - Barbara Norman
  1   32.50   26.00         12.12   38.12                 Kenneth Koutz - Robert Rottmayer
  5   62.50   50.00  NE      0.00   50.00                 Kate Hill - Randy Randolph

Thursday Evening Pairs Thursday Eve Session February 6, 2014
Scores after  5 rounds  Average:   40.0      Section  A  East-West
Pair    Pct   Score  Rank   HNDCP   Total  Rank   MPs
  5   57.66   46.13   1     11.50   57.63   1    0.40     Harry Polley - Jean Polley
  4   47.50   38.00         16.27   54.27   2    0.14     Judy Sitzman - Doris Beckert
  1   53.13   42.50   2     11.45   53.95        0.28     Larry Soley - Ted Johnson
  3   50.48   40.38          9.08   49.46                 Conrad Larkin - Jan Conklin
  2   41.25   33.00         12.03   45.03                 Enid Barnes - Rich Gain



140206EEE#1

Board 1
North Deals
None Vul
10 5
K J 10 5
A K 10 8 5
K 5
A J 8 4 3
9 7 6
J 7
A J 10
N
WE
S
Q
A Q 8 2
Q 9 3 2
8 7 6 4
K 9 7 6 2
4 3
6 4
Q 9 3 2

EW 2N; EW 2; EW 2♣; EW 1♠; EW 1; Par −120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTN−1503.001.001-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 1-Soley-Johnson
2 N−1503.001.002-Stetson-Juarez vs 3-Larkin-Conklin
3 NTS−21001.003.003-Waterman-Norman vs 5-Polley-Polley
1 N−1503.001.004-Beckert-Smith vs 2-Barnes-Gain
3 NTN−31500.004.005-Hill-Randolph vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert

control 1


140206EEE#1

Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul
10 5
A 10 5 2
K Q J 5
Q 8 3
K 8 4 3
Q
10 4 3 2
A K 7 2
N
WE
S
Q J 9 7 6
J 9 7 6 4
A 7 6
A 2
K 8 3
9 8
J 10 9 6 5 4

EW 3♠; EW 1N; EW 1; NS 1♣; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠E44200.004.001-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 1-Soley-Johnson
4 ♠E−1503.001.002-Stetson-Juarez vs 3-Larkin-Conklin
2 ♣N31104.000.003-Waterman-Norman vs 5-Polley-Polley
PassPass1.502.504-Beckert-Smith vs 2-Barnes-Gain
PassPass1.502.505-Hill-Randolph vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert

control 2


140206EEE#1

Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul
J 8 7
Q 10 6 4 3
J 9 6 5
7
9 4 3 2
7
K 10 7
A J 5 4 2
N
WE
S
Q 10 6
K J 9 8
A 4 2
K 10 6
A K 5
A 5 2
Q 8 3
Q 9 8 3

EW 2♠; EW 3♣; EW 1N; NS 1; EW 1; Par −110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 S−1503.001.001-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 1-Soley-Johnson
2 S−1503.001.002-Stetson-Juarez vs 3-Larkin-Conklin
2 S−1503.001.003-Waterman-Norman vs 5-Polley-Polley
1 NTS−21000.503.504-Beckert-Smith vs 2-Barnes-Gain
2 S−21000.503.505-Hill-Randolph vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert

control 3


140206EEE#1

Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul
A K Q 10 6 4 3
7
J 8
7 5 4
8 2
K 10 6 5 4
A 9 7
K Q 10
N
WE
S
7
A Q 8 3
Q 10 5 2
9 8 3 2
J 9 5
J 9 2
K 6 4 3
A J 6

EW 4; S 3♠; N 2♠; EW 3; NS 1N; EW 2♣; Par −200: S 4♠×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 W46200.503.501-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 1-Soley-Johnson
3 ♠N31403.001.002-Stetson-Juarez vs 3-Larkin-Conklin
4 W46200.503.503-Waterman-Norman vs 5-Polley-Polley
3 ♠N31403.001.004-Beckert-Smith vs 2-Barnes-Gain
3 ♠N31403.001.005-Hill-Randolph vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert

control 4


140206EEE#1

Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul
K Q 10 9 7 4
Q 7
K 10 4
10 2
A J 5
A J 10 9 6 5 4 3 2
5
N
WE
S
8 3
K 8
9 7 6 3 2
A 9 8 6
6 2
A Q J 8 5
K Q J 7 4 3

E 6; W 5; S 5; S 5♣; N 4; N 4♣; EW 2N; NS 2♠; Par −500: S 7♣×−2; S 7×−2

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠N−33000.004.001-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 5-Polley-Polley
4 ♠N−11002.501.502-Stetson-Juarez vs 2-Barnes-Gain
4 ♠N46204.000.003-Waterman-Norman vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert
4 ♠N−11002.501.504-Beckert-Smith vs 1-Soley-Johnson
5 ♠N−22001.003.005-Hill-Randolph vs 3-Larkin-Conklin

control 5


140206EEE#1

Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul
5 4
8 5
A K J 9 6 4
Q 10 5
A K 10 9 2
6 3 2
10 7
9 7 4
N
WE
S
Q J 6
A K Q 9 7
3 2
K 8 3
8 7 3
J 10 4
Q 8 5
A J 6 2

EW 2♠; EW 2; NS 3; NS 3♣; Par +110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠E46201.502.501-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 5-Polley-Polley
2 E52003.001.002-Stetson-Juarez vs 2-Barnes-Gain
4 ♠E46201.502.503-Waterman-Norman vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert
4 E56500.004.004-Beckert-Smith vs 1-Soley-Johnson
4 S−1504.000.005-Hill-Randolph vs 3-Larkin-Conklin

control 6


140206EEE#1

Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul
A J 7 2
K 9 8 6 4 2
A
5 4
K 9 8 6
A 10 7 5 3
10 8 6
8
N
WE
S
10 5 3
Q
Q J 2
A Q 9 7 3 2
Q 4
J
K 9 7 5 4 3
K J 10 6

NS 1N; NS 2; NS 1♠; NS 1; NS 1♣; Par +90

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 N−11000.004.001-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 5-Polley-Polley
2 N21102.501.502-Stetson-Juarez vs 2-Barnes-Gain
2 NTS41804.000.003-Waterman-Norman vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert
2 S2901.003.004-Beckert-Smith vs 1-Soley-Johnson
2 N21102.501.505-Hill-Randolph vs 3-Larkin-Conklin

control 7


140206EEE#1

Board 8
West Deals
None Vul
4
K 6 4 2
A K 7 2
8 6 3 2
K 5 2
J 10 8 7 5 3
10
A Q 7
N
WE
S
Q 7
A Q 9
J 5 4 3
J 9 5 4
A J 10 9 8 6 3
Q 9 8 6
K 10

NS 4♠; EW 4; EW 2N; NS 2; EW 1♣; Par +100: EW 5×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 W44200.004.001-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 5-Polley-Polley
4 W−1504.000.002-Stetson-Juarez vs 2-Barnes-Gain
3 ♠S−1502.002.003-Waterman-Norman vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert
3 ♠S−1502.002.004-Beckert-Smith vs 1-Soley-Johnson
3 ♠S−1502.002.005-Hill-Randolph vs 3-Larkin-Conklin

control 8


140206EEE#1

Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul
K 10 8
Q J 7 6
10 4 3
10 8 5
A Q 5
10 9
Q 8 5 2
A K 7 2
N
WE
S
J 9 6 4
A 4 2
K 9 6
Q 9 3
7 3 2
K 8 5 3
A J 7
J 6 4

W 4♠; E 3♠; EW 2N; EW 3; EW 3♣; EW 1; Par −620

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 NTW21201.003.001-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert
3 NTW−22003.001.002-Stetson-Juarez vs 1-Soley-Johnson
3 NTW−11002.002.003-Waterman-Norman vs 3-Larkin-Conklin
2 ♠E31400.004.004-Beckert-Smith vs 5-Polley-Polley
3 NTW−33004.000.005-Hill-Randolph vs 2-Barnes-Gain

control 9


140206EEE#1

Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul
9 5
A K Q 7 6
K J 3 2
A J
A J 4 3
4
A 9 5 4
K 9 7 6
N
WE
S
Q 7
J 9 8 5 3 2
Q 10
Q 4 2
K 10 8 6 2
10
8 7 6
10 8 5 3

EW 2; EW 1N; EW 1♠; EW 1; EW 1♣; Par −110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 NTN31503.001.001-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert
2 N−11002.002.002-Stetson-Juarez vs 1-Soley-Johnson
3 N−22000.503.503-Waterman-Norman vs 3-Larkin-Conklin
2 N−22000.503.504-Beckert-Smith vs 5-Polley-Polley
3 NTN36004.000.005-Hill-Randolph vs 2-Barnes-Gain

control 10


140206EEE#1

Board 11
South Deals
None Vul
Q 3
Q J 2
A J 8 4 3
K 10 5
8 7 4
A 7 6 3
Q 5 2
Q J 8
N
WE
S
K J 2
4
K 10 9 7 6
9 7 3 2
A 10 9 6 5
K 10 9 8 5
A 6 4

NS 5; NS 4♠; NS 3N; NS 2♣; NS 1; Par +450

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 S52000.503.501-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert
3 NTN34002.501.502-Stetson-Juarez vs 1-Soley-Johnson
3 NTN34002.501.503-Waterman-Norman vs 3-Larkin-Conklin
2 S52000.503.504-Beckert-Smith vs 5-Polley-Polley
4 S44204.000.005-Hill-Randolph vs 2-Barnes-Gain

control 11


140206EEE#1

Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul
J 8
7 6
A K 10 6
7 6 5 4 2
Q 10 7 6 4 3 2
K 8 4 3
7
8
N
WE
S
K 5
A Q 10 2
Q 5 3
A K 10 9
A 9
J 9 5
J 9 8 4 2
Q J 3

EW 5♠; EW 5; EW 2N; EW 1♣; Par −450

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 S5AVEAVE2.002.001-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert
4 ♠W54502.002.002-Stetson-Juarez vs 1-Soley-Johnson
4 ♠W64800.133.883-Waterman-Norman vs 3-Larkin-Conklin
3 NTE−1503.880.134-Beckert-Smith vs 5-Polley-Polley
4 ♠W54502.002.005-Hill-Randolph vs 2-Barnes-Gain

control 12


140206EEE#1

Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul
2
4
A K 7 3 2
K Q J 10 9 6
A 10 7 6 4
Q J 9 7 5 2
5
8
N
WE
S
J 5
A K 8
J 10 9 8
A 7 5 4
K Q 9 8 3
10 6 3
Q 6 4
3 2

EW 4; EW 3♠; EW 2N; NS 3♣; NS 2; Par −500: NS 5♣×−2

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 W41702.002.001-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 3-Larkin-Conklin
5 ♣×N−12001.003.002-Stetson-Juarez vs 5-Polley-Polley
5 ♣×N−25000.004.003-Waterman-Norman vs 2-Barnes-Gain
3 W31403.001.004-Beckert-Smith vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert
3 NTN−11004.000.005-Hill-Randolph vs 1-Soley-Johnson

control 13


140206EEE#1

Board 14
East Deals
None Vul
J 10 8 6
A K 8
10 9 8
K 10 2
Q 3
Q 7 6
A K Q 6 5
9 7 5
N
WE
S
A 5
J 9 5 3
4 3
A Q J 6 4
K 9 7 4 2
10 4 2
J 7 2
8 3

EW 5N; E 4; EW 5; W 3; EW 4♣; EW 1♠; Par −460

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW54602.002.001-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 3-Larkin-Conklin
2 E41703.001.002-Stetson-Juarez vs 5-Polley-Polley
3 NTE64901.003.003-Waterman-Norman vs 2-Barnes-Gain
2 W51504.000.004-Beckert-Smith vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert
3 NT×E35500.004.005-Hill-Randolph vs 1-Soley-Johnson

control 14


140206EEE#1

Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul
Q 9 6 4
9
A K 10
A Q J 7 5
K 5
K 8 6 2
8 2
9 8 4 3 2
N
WE
S
10 7
A 10 3
J 6 5 4 3
K 10 6
A J 8 3 2
Q J 7 5 4
Q 9 7

NS 5♠; NS 3N; NS 2; NS 2; NS 2♣; Par +650

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6 ♠S−11000.503.501-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 3-Larkin-Conklin
5 ♠S−11000.503.502-Stetson-Juarez vs 5-Polley-Polley
5 ♠S56504.000.003-Waterman-Norman vs 2-Barnes-Gain
2 ♠S52002.002.004-Beckert-Smith vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert
4 ♠N46203.001.005-Hill-Randolph vs 1-Soley-Johnson

control 15


140206EEE#1

Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul
J 6
A K Q 6
A 8 7 3
Q 10 8
10
10 8 4 3 2
J 10 5
A 9 3 2
N
WE
S
K 9 7 2
J
K 9 6 4 2
J 7 6
A Q 8 5 4 3
9 7 5
Q
K 5 4

NS 5♠; NS 3N; NS 3; NS 2♣; NS 1; Par +450

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠N44201.003.001-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 3-Larkin-Conklin
4 ♠N54503.500.502-Stetson-Juarez vs 5-Polley-Polley
3 NTN44302.002.003-Waterman-Norman vs 2-Barnes-Gain
4 ♠N−1500.004.004-Beckert-Smith vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert
4 ♠N54503.500.505-Hill-Randolph vs 1-Soley-Johnson

control 16


140206EEE#1

Board 17
North Deals
None Vul
K 9 7 2
K Q 6
A K 8 6 5 4
10 8 5
A 10 7 5 3
J 10 6
Q 7
N
WE
S
A Q J 6
9 8 4
A 9 2
9 3 2
4 3
J 2
K Q 8 7 5 4 3
J 10

EW 2; N 1N; NS 2♣; EW 1♠; NS 1; Par −100: N 2N×−1; NS 3♣×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♣N−1500.503.501-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 2-Barnes-Gain
2 ♣N2903.001.002-Stetson-Juarez vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert
5 ♣N−1500.503.503-Waterman-Norman vs 1-Soley-Johnson
2 W−1502.002.004-Beckert-Smith vs 3-Larkin-Conklin
1 ♣N31104.000.005-Hill-Randolph vs 5-Polley-Polley

control 17


140206EEE#1

Board 18
East Deals
N-S Vul
Q 8 3
K 9 8 7 3 2
K 2
5 2
7 4
A 10 6 5
9 8 6
Q J 4 3
N
WE
S
K 10 9 5
Q 4
A Q 4
K 8 7 6
A J 6 2
J
J 10 7 5 3
A 10 9

EW 1N; EW 2♣; NS 1♠; NS 1; EW 1; Par −90

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTE−1503.001.001-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 2-Barnes-Gain
1 ♠E−21004.000.002-Stetson-Juarez vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert
2 ♠S−11002.002.003-Waterman-Norman vs 1-Soley-Johnson
1 NTW21201.003.004-Beckert-Smith vs 3-Larkin-Conklin
3 N−22000.004.005-Hill-Randolph vs 5-Polley-Polley

control 18


140206EEE#1

Board 19
South Deals
E-W Vul
A 9 7 6
A K 8 6
8 7
K Q 8
10 4
9 7 5 4
J 9 4
A J 3 2
N
WE
S
J 8 3
A K Q 10 5 3 2
9 5 4
K Q 5 2
Q J 10 3 2
6
10 7 6

NS 5; N 3♠; S 2♠; EW 3; NS 1♣; Par +450

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 N52001.003.001-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 2-Barnes-Gain
3 N41700.004.002-Stetson-Juarez vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert
4 S54503.001.003-Waterman-Norman vs 1-Soley-Johnson
4 N54503.001.004-Beckert-Smith vs 3-Larkin-Conklin
4 N54503.001.005-Hill-Randolph vs 5-Polley-Polley

control 19


140206EEE#1

Board 20
West Deals
Both Vul
Q 4
A K J 10 8 5
8 4 3 2
2
J 3
9 4 2
Q 9 6
K Q 10 8 5
N
WE
S
K 9 7 6 2
7 3
A 10 7
J 7 4
A 10 8 5
Q 6
K J 5
A 9 6 3

NS 4; NS 3N; NS 4; NS 2♠; Par +620

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 N52001.502.501-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 2-Barnes-Gain
4 N56503.001.002-Stetson-Juarez vs 4-Sitzman-Beckert
3 N31400.004.003-Waterman-Norman vs 1-Soley-Johnson
1 NTW−22001.502.504-Beckert-Smith vs 3-Larkin-Conklin
4 N66804.000.005-Hill-Randolph vs 5-Polley-Polley

control 20


140206EEE#1

control 21


140206EEE#1

control 22


140206EEE#1

control 23


140206EEE#1

control 24


140206EEE#1

control 25


140206EEE#1

control 26


140206EEE#1

control 27


140206EEE#1

control 28