Thursday Evening Pairs Thursday Eve Session January 30, 2014 Scores after 5 rounds Average: 40.0 Section A North-South Pair Pct Score Rank HNDCP Total Rank MPs 1 46.71 37.37 12.00 49.37 1 0.24 Charlene Stone - PAT LE BECK 4 49.06 39.25 2 8.53 47.78 2 0.34 Conrad Larkin - Jan Conklin 2 44.39 35.51 10.17 45.68 Nan Halberg - Rich Gain 3 40.16 32.13 11.74 43.87 Ann Waterman - Doris Mendell 5 52.51 42.01 1 0.00 42.01 0.48 Kathy Juarez - Abbe Cohen 6 67.94 54.35 NE 0.00 54.35 Kristin Rimal - Nancy Gunn Thursday Evening Pairs Thursday Eve Session January 30, 2014 Scores after 5 rounds Average: 40.0 Section A East-West Pair Pct Score Rank HNDCP Total Rank MPs 5 61.51 49.21 1 16.00 65.21 1 0.48 Jean Polley - Harry Polley 1 50.16 40.13 15.55 55.68 2 0.17 Jeannette Mottet - Marjorie La Berge 2 56.41 45.13 2 6.40 51.53 0.34 Daniel Roberts - Nancy Stetson 4 43.29 34.63 15.47 50.10 Mary Hartman - Stephanie Poley 3 33.76 27.01 11.06 38.07 Robert Rottmayer - Kenneth Koutz 6 55.76 44.61 NE 0.00 44.61 Randy Randolph - Kate Hill
Board 1 North Deals None Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EW 4♠; EW 2♦; NS 2♣; N 1♥; Par −420
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
2 ♣ | N | 3 | 110 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 1-Stone-LE BECK vs 1-Mottet-La Berge | ||
2 ♠ | E | 3 | 140 | 0.50 | 3.50 | 3-Waterman-Mendell vs 4-Hartman-Poley | ||
4 ♠ | E | −1 | 50 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 4-Larkin-Conklin vs 6-Randolph-Hill | ||
3 ♠ | E | 3 | 140 | 0.50 | 3.50 | 5-Juarez-Cohen vs 3-Rottmayer-Koutz | ||
4 ♣ | N | −1 | 50 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 6-Rimal-Gunn vs 5-Polley-Polley |
control 1
Board 2 East Deals N-S Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EW 4N; EW 4♠; EW 4♥; EW 4♣; EW 3♦; Par −430
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
2 NT | E | 2 | 120 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 1-Stone-LE BECK vs 1-Mottet-La Berge | ||
1 NT | W | 1 | 90 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 3-Waterman-Mendell vs 4-Hartman-Poley | ||
3 ♣ | E | 4 | 130 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 4-Larkin-Conklin vs 6-Randolph-Hill | ||
3 NT | W | −1 | 50 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 5-Juarez-Cohen vs 3-Rottmayer-Koutz | ||
2 NT | E | −1 | 50 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 6-Rimal-Gunn vs 5-Polley-Polley |
control 2
Board 3 South Deals E-W Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 6N; NS 6♠; N 6♣; NS 5♥; N 5♦; S 5♣; S 4♦; Par +990
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
6 ♠ | N | 6 | 980 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1-Stone-LE BECK vs 1-Mottet-La Berge | ||
6 ♠ | N | 6 | 980 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 3-Waterman-Mendell vs 4-Hartman-Poley | ||
5 ♠ | N | 6 | 480 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 4-Larkin-Conklin vs 6-Randolph-Hill | ||
6 ♠ | N | 6 | 980 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 5-Juarez-Cohen vs 3-Rottmayer-Koutz | ||
6 ♠ | N | 7 | 1010 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 6-Rimal-Gunn vs 5-Polley-Polley |
control 3
Board 4 West Deals Both Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
W 4♦; W 2N; E 3♦; E 1N; EW 2♣; EW 1♠; EW 1♥; Par −130
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
2 NT | E | −1 | 100 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 1-Stone-LE BECK vs 1-Mottet-La Berge | ||
2 NT | W | −1 | 100 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 3-Waterman-Mendell vs 4-Hartman-Poley | ||
3 NT | E | −1 | 100 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 4-Larkin-Conklin vs 6-Randolph-Hill | ||
3 NT | W | −3 | 300 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 5-Juarez-Cohen vs 3-Rottmayer-Koutz | ||
3 NT | W | −2 | 200 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 6-Rimal-Gunn vs 5-Polley-Polley |
control 4
Board 5 North Deals N-S Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 4♥; S 3N; NS 3♠; N 2N; S 2♦; NS 2♣; Par +620
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
3 NT | S | −1 | 100 | 0.50 | 3.50 | 1-Stone-LE BECK vs 6-Randolph-Hill | ||
3 NT | S | 3 | 600 | 2.50 | 1.50 | 2-Halberg-Gain vs 2-Roberts-Stetson | ||
3 NT | S | 3 | 600 | 2.50 | 1.50 | 4-Larkin-Conklin vs 5-Polley-Polley | ||
4 ♥ | S | −1 | 100 | 0.50 | 3.50 | 5-Juarez-Cohen vs 1-Mottet-La Berge | ||
4 ♥ | S | 4 | 620 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 6-Rimal-Gunn vs 4-Hartman-Poley |
control 5
Board 6 East Deals E-W Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EW 2N; E 2♠; EW 2♥; E 3♦; NS 2♣; W 1♠; W 1♦; Par −110
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
3 ♣ | N | 3 | 110 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 1-Stone-LE BECK vs 6-Randolph-Hill | ||
1 NT | E | 2 | 120 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 2-Halberg-Gain vs 2-Roberts-Stetson | ||
2 ♠ | S | 2 | 110 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 4-Larkin-Conklin vs 5-Polley-Polley | ||
2 NT | E | −1 | 100 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 5-Juarez-Cohen vs 1-Mottet-La Berge | ||
2 ♥ | S | −3 | 150 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 6-Rimal-Gunn vs 4-Hartman-Poley |
control 6
Board 7 South Deals Both Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EW 2♥; EW 1N; NS 2♣; EW 1♠; NS 1♦; Par −110
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
2 ♥ | E | 4 | 170 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 1-Stone-LE BECK vs 6-Randolph-Hill | ||
3 ♥ | E | 3 | 140 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 2-Halberg-Gain vs 2-Roberts-Stetson | ||
3 ♥ | E | 3 | 140 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 4-Larkin-Conklin vs 5-Polley-Polley | ||
2 ♥ | E | 2 | 110 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 5-Juarez-Cohen vs 1-Mottet-La Berge | ||
2 ♥ | E | 2 | 110 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 6-Rimal-Gunn vs 4-Hartman-Poley |
control 7
Board 8 West Deals None Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
N 2N; N 2♠; S 1N; S 1♠; NS 1♥; N 1♦; NS 1♣; Par +120
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
2 ♦ | E | −1 | 50 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 1-Stone-LE BECK vs 6-Randolph-Hill | ||
2 NT | S | −2 | 100 | 0.50 | 3.50 | 2-Halberg-Gain vs 2-Roberts-Stetson | ||
2 NT | S | −2 | 100 | 0.50 | 3.50 | 4-Larkin-Conklin vs 5-Polley-Polley | ||
2 NT | N | −1 | 50 | 2.50 | 1.50 | 5-Juarez-Cohen vs 1-Mottet-La Berge | ||
3 NT | S | −1 | 50 | 2.50 | 1.50 | 6-Rimal-Gunn vs 4-Hartman-Poley |
control 8
Board 9 North Deals E-W Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 2♠; EW 2♥; EW 3♣; W 1N; NS 1♦; Par −100: NS 3♠×−1
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
2 NT | W | 2 | 120 | 0.50 | 3.50 | 1-Stone-LE BECK vs 5-Polley-Polley | ||
2 NT | W | 2 | 120 | 0.50 | 3.50 | 2-Halberg-Gain vs 1-Mottet-La Berge | ||
3 ♠ | S | −1 | 50 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 3-Waterman-Mendell vs 3-Rottmayer-Koutz | ||
4 ♠× | S | −1 | 100 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 5-Juarez-Cohen vs 6-Randolph-Hill | ||
3 ♦ | N | 3 | 110 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 6-Rimal-Gunn vs 2-Roberts-Stetson |
control 9
Board 10 East Deals Both Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
S 6♦; NS 5N; N 5♦; NS 5♣; EW 2♥; Par +1100: EW 6♥×−4
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
5 ♦ | N | 6 | 620 | 2.50 | 1.50 | 1-Stone-LE BECK vs 5-Polley-Polley | ||
3 ♦ | N | 5 | 150 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 2-Halberg-Gain vs 1-Mottet-La Berge | ||
5 ♦ | N | 6 | 620 | 2.50 | 1.50 | 3-Waterman-Mendell vs 3-Rottmayer-Koutz | ||
4 ♠× | E | −2 | 500 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 5-Juarez-Cohen vs 6-Randolph-Hill | ||
3 NT | N | 5 | 660 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 6-Rimal-Gunn vs 2-Roberts-Stetson |
control 10
Board 11 South Deals None Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EW 2♠; NS 1N; EW 2♦; E 1♥; EW 1♣; Par −100: NS 2N×−1
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
3 ♦ | W | 4 | 130 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 1-Stone-LE BECK vs 5-Polley-Polley | ||
4 ♠ | W | −4 | 200 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 2-Halberg-Gain vs 1-Mottet-La Berge | ||
2 ♠ | E | 2 | 110 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 3-Waterman-Mendell vs 3-Rottmayer-Koutz | ||
2 ♠ | E | −1 | 50 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 5-Juarez-Cohen vs 6-Randolph-Hill | ||
3 NT | W | −5 | 250 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 6-Rimal-Gunn vs 2-Roberts-Stetson |
control 11
Board 12 West Deals N-S Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EW 5♠; EW 5♥; EW 3N; EW 2♦; NS 1♣; Par −450
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
3 ♥ | W | 3 | 140 | 1.38 | 2.63 | 2-Halberg-Gain vs 1-Mottet-La Berge | ||
4 ♥ | W | −1 | 50 | 3.88 | 0.13 | 3-Waterman-Mendell vs 3-Rottmayer-Koutz | ||
1 NT | E | 1 | 90 | 2.63 | 1.38 | 5-Juarez-Cohen vs 6-Randolph-Hill | ||
4 ♥ | W | 4 | 420 | 0.13 | 3.88 | 6-Rimal-Gunn vs 2-Roberts-Stetson |
control 12
Board 13 North Deals Both Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 7N; NS 7♣; NS 6♠; NS 2♥; NS 1♦; Par +2220
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
4 ♠ | N | 7 | 710 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 1-Stone-LE BECK vs 3-Rottmayer-Koutz | ||
4 ♠ | N | 7 | 710 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 2-Halberg-Gain vs 6-Randolph-Hill | ||
4 ♠ | N | 5 | 650 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 3-Waterman-Mendell vs 2-Roberts-Stetson | ||
3 NT | N | 5 | 660 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 4-Larkin-Conklin vs 4-Hartman-Poley | ||
4 ♠ | N | 7 | 710 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 6-Rimal-Gunn vs 1-Mottet-La Berge |
control 13
Board 14 East Deals None Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EW 5♥; EW 2N; EW 2♠; EW 1♦; Par −450
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
2 ♦ | W | −1 | 50 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 1-Stone-LE BECK vs 3-Rottmayer-Koutz | ||
4 ♥ | E | 4 | 420 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 2-Halberg-Gain vs 6-Randolph-Hill | ||
2 ♥ | E | 6 | 230 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 3-Waterman-Mendell vs 2-Roberts-Stetson | ||
2 ♠ | N | −4 | 200 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 4-Larkin-Conklin vs 4-Hartman-Poley | ||
3 ♥ | E | 4 | 170 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 6-Rimal-Gunn vs 1-Mottet-La Berge |
control 14
Board 15 South Deals N-S Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 2N; NS 2♠; NS 2♦; EW 1♣; Par +120
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
1 NT | N | 1 | 90 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 1-Stone-LE BECK vs 3-Rottmayer-Koutz | ||
1 ♠ | E | −3 | 150 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 2-Halberg-Gain vs 6-Randolph-Hill | ||
2 NT | N | 2 | 120 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 3-Waterman-Mendell vs 2-Roberts-Stetson | ||
1 NT | N | 3 | 150 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 4-Larkin-Conklin vs 4-Hartman-Poley | ||
3 ♥ | E | −1 | 50 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 6-Rimal-Gunn vs 1-Mottet-La Berge |
control 15
Board 16 West Deals E-W Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 3♠; EW 2♥; NS 2♦; NS 1♣; Par +140
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
2 ♠ | N | 3 | 140 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 1-Stone-LE BECK vs 3-Rottmayer-Koutz | ||
2 ♥ | E | 2 | 110 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 2-Halberg-Gain vs 6-Randolph-Hill | ||
2 NT | W | −2 | 200 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 3-Waterman-Mendell vs 2-Roberts-Stetson | ||
4 ♠ | N | 4 | 420 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 4-Larkin-Conklin vs 4-Hartman-Poley | ||
4 ♠ | N | 4 | 420 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 6-Rimal-Gunn vs 1-Mottet-La Berge |
control 16
Board 17 North Deals None Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 6♥; NS 6♦; NS 6♣; NS 4N; NS 1♠; Par +980
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
4 ♥ | N | 5 | 450 | 0.50 | 3.50 | 1-Stone-LE BECK vs 2-Roberts-Stetson | ||
4 ♥ | N | 6 | 480 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 2-Halberg-Gain vs 4-Hartman-Poley | ||
4 ♥ | N | 6 | 480 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 3-Waterman-Mendell vs 1-Mottet-La Berge | ||
4 ♥ | N | 6 | 480 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 4-Larkin-Conklin vs 3-Rottmayer-Koutz | ||
4 ♥ | N | 5 | 450 | 0.50 | 3.50 | 5-Juarez-Cohen vs 5-Polley-Polley |
control 17
Board 18 East Deals N-S Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
W 4N; E 3N; EW 3♠; EW 3♥; EW 4♦; EW 4♣; Par −430
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
3 NT | W | 4 | 430 | 0.50 | 3.50 | 1-Stone-LE BECK vs 2-Roberts-Stetson | ||
3 ♣ | W | 5 | 150 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 2-Halberg-Gain vs 4-Hartman-Poley | ||
3 NT | E | 3 | 400 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 3-Waterman-Mendell vs 1-Mottet-La Berge | ||
2 ♣ | W | 4 | 130 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 4-Larkin-Conklin vs 3-Rottmayer-Koutz | ||
3 NT | E | 4 | 430 | 0.50 | 3.50 | 5-Juarez-Cohen vs 5-Polley-Polley |
control 18
Board 19 South Deals E-W Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 5♠; NS 5♦; NS 5♣; NS 2N; EW 1♥; Par +450
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
4 ♠ | N | 5 | 450 | 2.50 | 1.50 | 1-Stone-LE BECK vs 2-Roberts-Stetson | ||
3 NT | S | 4 | 430 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 2-Halberg-Gain vs 4-Hartman-Poley | ||
4 ♠ | S | 5 | 450 | 2.50 | 1.50 | 3-Waterman-Mendell vs 1-Mottet-La Berge | ||
4 ♠ | S | 5 | 450 | 2.50 | 1.50 | 4-Larkin-Conklin vs 3-Rottmayer-Koutz | ||
4 ♠ | S | 5 | 450 | 2.50 | 1.50 | 5-Juarez-Cohen vs 5-Polley-Polley |
control 19
Board 20 West Deals Both Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 4♥; NS 3N; NS 2♠; NS 2♦; NS 2♣; Par +620
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
3 NT | S | 5 | 660 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 1-Stone-LE BECK vs 2-Roberts-Stetson | ||
2 ♥ | S | 3 | 140 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 2-Halberg-Gain vs 4-Hartman-Poley | ||
2 ♥ | S | 3 | 140 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 3-Waterman-Mendell vs 1-Mottet-La Berge | ||
4 ♥ | N | 4 | 620 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 4-Larkin-Conklin vs 3-Rottmayer-Koutz | ||
4 ♥ | S | −1 | 100 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 5-Juarez-Cohen vs 5-Polley-Polley |
control 20
Board 21 North Deals N-S Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EW 5♥; E 3♠; W 2♠; EW 1N; NS 2♣; EW 1♦; Par −450
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
3 ♠ | E | −1 | 50 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 2-Halberg-Gain vs 3-Rottmayer-Koutz | ||
4 ♥ | W | 4 | 420 | 0.50 | 3.50 | 3-Waterman-Mendell vs 5-Polley-Polley | ||
4 ♥ | W | 4 | 420 | 0.50 | 3.50 | 4-Larkin-Conklin vs 2-Roberts-Stetson | ||
3 ♥ | W | 4 | 170 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 5-Juarez-Cohen vs 4-Hartman-Poley | ||
4 ♠ | E | −1 | 50 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 6-Rimal-Gunn vs 6-Randolph-Hill |
control 21
Board 22 East Deals E-W Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 1N; S 2♦; NS 2♣; EW 1♠; EW 1♥; N 1♦; Par +90
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
1 NT | S | −1 | 50 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 2-Halberg-Gain vs 3-Rottmayer-Koutz | ||
1 NT | S | −1 | 50 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 3-Waterman-Mendell vs 5-Polley-Polley | ||
2 NT | S | −1 | 50 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 4-Larkin-Conklin vs 2-Roberts-Stetson | ||
2 NT | S | 2 | 120 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 5-Juarez-Cohen vs 4-Hartman-Poley | ||
3 ♣ | S | 3 | 110 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 6-Rimal-Gunn vs 6-Randolph-Hill |
control 22
Board 23 South Deals Both Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 1N; EW 2♦; NS 2♣; EW 1♠; NS 1♥; Par −90
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
1 NT | S | 2 | 120 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 2-Halberg-Gain vs 3-Rottmayer-Koutz | ||
1 NT | S | 1 | 90 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 3-Waterman-Mendell vs 5-Polley-Polley | ||
3 ♣ | S | 3 | 110 | 2.50 | 1.50 | 4-Larkin-Conklin vs 2-Roberts-Stetson | ||
3 ♣ | S | 3 | 110 | 2.50 | 1.50 | 5-Juarez-Cohen vs 4-Hartman-Poley | ||
3 ♦ | W | −1 | 100 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 6-Rimal-Gunn vs 6-Randolph-Hill |
control 23
Board 24 West Deals None Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EW 4♥; EW 4♦; EW 1N; NS 1♠; NS 1♣; Par −420
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
2 ♥ | E | 3 | 140 | 2.63 | 1.38 | 2-Halberg-Gain vs 3-Rottmayer-Koutz | ||
4 ♥ | E | 4 | 420 | 0.75 | 3.25 | 3-Waterman-Mendell vs 5-Polley-Polley | ||
4 ♥ | E | 4 | 420 | 0.75 | 3.25 | 4-Larkin-Conklin vs 2-Roberts-Stetson | ||
5 ♥ | W | −1 | 50 | 3.88 | 0.13 | 5-Juarez-Cohen vs 4-Hartman-Poley |
control 24
control 25
control 26
control 27
control 28