Thursday Evening Pairs Thursday Eve Session January 30, 2014
Scores after  5 rounds  Average:   40.0      Section  A  North-South
Pair    Pct   Score  Rank   HNDCP   Total  Rank   MPs
  1   46.71   37.37         12.00   49.37   1    0.24     Charlene Stone - PAT LE BECK
  4   49.06   39.25   2      8.53   47.78   2    0.34     Conrad Larkin - Jan Conklin
  2   44.39   35.51         10.17   45.68                 Nan Halberg - Rich Gain
  3   40.16   32.13         11.74   43.87                 Ann Waterman - Doris Mendell
  5   52.51   42.01   1      0.00   42.01        0.48     Kathy Juarez - Abbe Cohen
  6   67.94   54.35  NE      0.00   54.35                 Kristin Rimal - Nancy Gunn

Thursday Evening Pairs Thursday Eve Session January 30, 2014
Scores after  5 rounds  Average:   40.0      Section  A  East-West
Pair    Pct   Score  Rank   HNDCP   Total  Rank   MPs
  5   61.51   49.21   1     16.00   65.21   1    0.48     Jean Polley - Harry Polley
  1   50.16   40.13         15.55   55.68   2    0.17     Jeannette Mottet - Marjorie La Berge
  2   56.41   45.13   2      6.40   51.53        0.34     Daniel Roberts - Nancy Stetson
  4   43.29   34.63         15.47   50.10                 Mary Hartman - Stephanie Poley
  3   33.76   27.01         11.06   38.07                 Robert Rottmayer - Kenneth Koutz
  6   55.76   44.61  NE      0.00   44.61                 Randy Randolph - Kate Hill



140130E#1

Board 1
North Deals
None Vul
A 8 3
9
A J 2
K Q 9 8 5 4
K 9 6 4
A 5 4 3
10 9 5
10 2
N
WE
S
Q J 10 5 2
K Q
K Q 8 4
A J
7
J 10 8 7 6 2
7 6 3
7 6 3

EW 4♠; EW 2; NS 2♣; N 1; Par −420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 ♣N31104.000.001-Stone-LE BECK vs 1-Mottet-La Berge
2 ♠E31400.503.503-Waterman-Mendell vs 4-Hartman-Poley
4 ♠E−1503.001.004-Larkin-Conklin vs 6-Randolph-Hill
3 ♠E31400.503.505-Juarez-Cohen vs 3-Rottmayer-Koutz
4 ♣N−1502.002.006-Rimal-Gunn vs 5-Polley-Polley

control 1


140130E#1

Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul
J 7 6 4 3
Q 8 7
J 9 5
J 7
A 2
J 10 9 5
K 7 3 2
A 6 2
N
WE
S
K 9 8 5
K 6 3
A 6
K 10 9 5
Q 10
A 4 2
Q 10 8 4
Q 8 4 3

EW 4N; EW 4♠; EW 4; EW 4♣; EW 3; Par −430

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 NTE21201.003.001-Stone-LE BECK vs 1-Mottet-La Berge
1 NTW1902.002.003-Waterman-Mendell vs 4-Hartman-Poley
3 ♣E41300.004.004-Larkin-Conklin vs 6-Randolph-Hill
3 NTW−1503.500.505-Juarez-Cohen vs 3-Rottmayer-Koutz
2 NTE−1503.500.506-Rimal-Gunn vs 5-Polley-Polley

control 2


140130E#1

Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul
A K J 9 4
A Q J 10
8 5
A 5
6 5 3
9 4
Q 10 6 4
J 10 9 8
N
WE
S
10 8
K 8 7 5 3
J 9 2
7 6 4
Q 7 2
6 2
A K 7 3
K Q 3 2

NS 6N; NS 6♠; N 6♣; NS 5; N 5; S 5♣; S 4; Par +990

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6 ♠N69802.002.001-Stone-LE BECK vs 1-Mottet-La Berge
6 ♠N69802.002.003-Waterman-Mendell vs 4-Hartman-Poley
5 ♠N64800.004.004-Larkin-Conklin vs 6-Randolph-Hill
6 ♠N69802.002.005-Juarez-Cohen vs 3-Rottmayer-Koutz
6 ♠N710104.000.006-Rimal-Gunn vs 5-Polley-Polley

control 3


140130E#1

Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul
K 9 5 3
10 7 6
K J 7 4
8 6
Q 4 2
8 5
Q 9 2
A K Q 9 5
N
WE
S
A 8 7
K Q 9 3
A 8 6 5 3
4
J 10 6
A J 4 2
10
J 10 7 3 2

W 4; W 2N; E 3; E 1N; EW 2♣; EW 1♠; EW 1; Par −130

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 NTE−11001.003.001-Stone-LE BECK vs 1-Mottet-La Berge
2 NTW−11001.003.003-Waterman-Mendell vs 4-Hartman-Poley
3 NTE−11001.003.004-Larkin-Conklin vs 6-Randolph-Hill
3 NTW−33004.000.005-Juarez-Cohen vs 3-Rottmayer-Koutz
3 NTW−22003.001.006-Rimal-Gunn vs 5-Polley-Polley

control 4


140130E#1

Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul
Q 9 7
A K 8 6
10 4 2
Q 4 2
6 4
Q 10
A J 9 8 7
K 10 7 5
N
WE
S
J 10 8 3
9 7 5
Q 6 5
9 8 6
A K 5 2
J 4 3 2
K 3
A J 3

NS 4; S 3N; NS 3♠; N 2N; S 2; NS 2♣; Par +620

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTS−11000.503.501-Stone-LE BECK vs 6-Randolph-Hill
3 NTS36002.501.502-Halberg-Gain vs 2-Roberts-Stetson
3 NTS36002.501.504-Larkin-Conklin vs 5-Polley-Polley
4 S−11000.503.505-Juarez-Cohen vs 1-Mottet-La Berge
4 S46204.000.006-Rimal-Gunn vs 4-Hartman-Poley

control 5


140130E#1

Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul
7 4
6 4
6 4 2
K Q J 9 6 2
J 8
Q 10 9 8
K 8 7 3
10 4 3
N
WE
S
A 9 6 2
A J 7
Q J 5
A 8 5
K Q 10 5 3
K 5 3 2
A 10 9
7

EW 2N; E 2♠; EW 2; E 3; NS 2♣; W 1♠; W 1; Par −110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♣N31103.500.501-Stone-LE BECK vs 6-Randolph-Hill
1 NTE21201.003.002-Halberg-Gain vs 2-Roberts-Stetson
2 ♠S21103.500.504-Larkin-Conklin vs 5-Polley-Polley
2 NTE−11002.002.005-Juarez-Cohen vs 1-Mottet-La Berge
2 S−31500.004.006-Rimal-Gunn vs 4-Hartman-Poley

control 6


140130E#1

Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul
A J 4
8 7 5
Q 5 3
A 9 6 3
10 5 3 2
K 10 9
A J 9 6
K 2
N
WE
S
Q 7 6
A Q J 4 3
7 2
Q 7 5
K 9 8
6 2
K 10 8 4
J 10 8 4

EW 2; EW 1N; NS 2♣; EW 1♠; NS 1; Par −110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 E41700.004.001-Stone-LE BECK vs 6-Randolph-Hill
3 E31401.502.502-Halberg-Gain vs 2-Roberts-Stetson
3 E31401.502.504-Larkin-Conklin vs 5-Polley-Polley
2 E21103.500.505-Juarez-Cohen vs 1-Mottet-La Berge
2 E21103.500.506-Rimal-Gunn vs 4-Hartman-Poley

control 7


140130E#1

Board 8
West Deals
None Vul
A K 7 5 2
K 8 3
J 3
A 9 2
Q 6 4
J 7 5
10 2
Q J 10 8 6
N
WE
S
J 9 8
A Q 10 4
A 9 8 6 4
5
10 3
9 6 2
K Q 7 5
K 7 4 3

N 2N; N 2♠; S 1N; S 1♠; NS 1; N 1; NS 1♣; Par +120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 E−1504.000.001-Stone-LE BECK vs 6-Randolph-Hill
2 NTS−21000.503.502-Halberg-Gain vs 2-Roberts-Stetson
2 NTS−21000.503.504-Larkin-Conklin vs 5-Polley-Polley
2 NTN−1502.501.505-Juarez-Cohen vs 1-Mottet-La Berge
3 NTS−1502.501.506-Rimal-Gunn vs 4-Hartman-Poley

control 8


140130E#1

Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul
Q
A 7 4 2
K Q 8 7 4 3
9 7
K 10
K 5 3
A J 2
A K J 10 8
N
WE
S
9 7 3
Q 9 8 6
6 5
6 5 4 3
A J 8 6 5 4 2
J 10
10 9
Q 2

NS 2♠; EW 2; EW 3♣; W 1N; NS 1; Par −100: NS 3♠×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 NTW21200.503.501-Stone-LE BECK vs 5-Polley-Polley
2 NTW21200.503.502-Halberg-Gain vs 1-Mottet-La Berge
3 ♠S−1503.001.003-Waterman-Mendell vs 3-Rottmayer-Koutz
4 ♠×S−11002.002.005-Juarez-Cohen vs 6-Randolph-Hill
3 N31104.000.006-Rimal-Gunn vs 2-Roberts-Stetson

control 9


140130E#1

Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul
A 9 2
8
A K Q 9 6 5
A 9 2
6 5
A K 10 5 3 2
3 2
10 8 4
N
WE
S
K Q J 10 7 4
9 7 4
8
J 7 6
8 3
Q J 6
J 10 7 4
K Q 5 3

S 6; NS 5N; N 5; NS 5♣; EW 2; Par +1100: EW 6×−4

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 N66202.501.501-Stone-LE BECK vs 5-Polley-Polley
3 N51500.004.002-Halberg-Gain vs 1-Mottet-La Berge
5 N66202.501.503-Waterman-Mendell vs 3-Rottmayer-Koutz
4 ♠×E−25001.003.005-Juarez-Cohen vs 6-Randolph-Hill
3 NTN56604.000.006-Rimal-Gunn vs 2-Roberts-Stetson

control 10


140130E#1

Board 11
South Deals
None Vul
8 4
8 7 5
Q 8 5
K J 6 4 2
6 5
9 6
K J 9 7 4 3
A 7 5
N
WE
S
A Q 10 9 2
K Q 4 3
A
10 9 3
K J 7 3
A J 10 2
10 6 2
Q 8

EW 2♠; NS 1N; EW 2; E 1; EW 1♣; Par −100: NS 2N×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 W41300.004.001-Stone-LE BECK vs 5-Polley-Polley
4 ♠W−42003.001.002-Halberg-Gain vs 1-Mottet-La Berge
2 ♠E21101.003.003-Waterman-Mendell vs 3-Rottmayer-Koutz
2 ♠E−1502.002.005-Juarez-Cohen vs 6-Randolph-Hill
3 NTW−52504.000.006-Rimal-Gunn vs 2-Roberts-Stetson

control 11


140130E#1

Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul
Q 7 2
6 5
A 10
Q 10 9 6 5 4
J 6 4 3
Q J 10 2
Q J 8 3
3
N
WE
S
A K 9 5
A K 9 4
9 4
A 7 2
10 8
8 7 3
K 7 6 5 2
K J 8

EW 5♠; EW 5; EW 3N; EW 2; NS 1♣; Par −450

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 W31401.382.632-Halberg-Gain vs 1-Mottet-La Berge
4 W−1503.880.133-Waterman-Mendell vs 3-Rottmayer-Koutz
1 NTE1902.631.385-Juarez-Cohen vs 6-Randolph-Hill
4 W44200.133.886-Rimal-Gunn vs 2-Roberts-Stetson

control 12


140130E#1

Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul
J 10 7 6 5 4
A J 4
A K
K J
Q 2
K Q 9 8 7 2
Q J 10 4
10
N
WE
S
9 8 3
6 5
9 8 7 6 2
Q 7 5
A K
10 3
5 3
A 9 8 6 4 3 2

NS 7N; NS 7♣; NS 6♠; NS 2; NS 1; Par +2220

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠N77103.001.001-Stone-LE BECK vs 3-Rottmayer-Koutz
4 ♠N77103.001.002-Halberg-Gain vs 6-Randolph-Hill
4 ♠N56500.004.003-Waterman-Mendell vs 2-Roberts-Stetson
3 NTN56601.003.004-Larkin-Conklin vs 4-Hartman-Poley
4 ♠N77103.001.006-Rimal-Gunn vs 1-Mottet-La Berge

control 13


140130E#1

Board 14
East Deals
None Vul
K 9 7 6 4
K 4
10 6
10 4 3 2
A 10 8 6
A J 8 5 4 2
K 7 6
N
WE
S
A Q J 10 8
J 9 5 3 2
3
J 5
5 3 2
Q 7
K Q 9 7
A Q 9 8

EW 5; EW 2N; EW 2♠; EW 1; Par −450

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 W−1504.000.001-Stone-LE BECK vs 3-Rottmayer-Koutz
4 E44200.004.002-Halberg-Gain vs 6-Randolph-Hill
2 E62301.003.003-Waterman-Mendell vs 2-Roberts-Stetson
2 ♠N−42002.002.004-Larkin-Conklin vs 4-Hartman-Poley
3 E41703.001.006-Rimal-Gunn vs 1-Mottet-La Berge

control 14


140130E#1

Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul
Q 8
A 10 4 3
J 10 9
A K 10 4
5
K 9 8
K 8 3 2
Q 9 8 6 2
N
WE
S
A J 6 4 2
Q J 6 5
Q 6
7 3
K 10 9 7 3
7 2
A 7 5 4
J 5

NS 2N; NS 2♠; NS 2; EW 1♣; Par +120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTN1901.003.001-Stone-LE BECK vs 3-Rottmayer-Koutz
1 ♠E−31503.500.502-Halberg-Gain vs 6-Randolph-Hill
2 NTN21202.002.003-Waterman-Mendell vs 2-Roberts-Stetson
1 NTN31503.500.504-Larkin-Conklin vs 4-Hartman-Poley
3 E−1500.004.006-Rimal-Gunn vs 1-Mottet-La Berge

control 15


140130E#1

Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul
A 10 9 5 3
A J 6 2
7 5 4
J
Q J 7 4
K 10 5
K 6 2
A 5 3
N
WE
S
6
Q 9 8 4 3
Q 10 9
K 7 6 2
K 8 2
7
A J 8 3
Q 10 9 8 4

NS 3♠; EW 2; NS 2; NS 1♣; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 ♠N31401.003.001-Stone-LE BECK vs 3-Rottmayer-Koutz
2 E21100.004.002-Halberg-Gain vs 6-Randolph-Hill
2 NTW−22002.002.003-Waterman-Mendell vs 2-Roberts-Stetson
4 ♠N44203.500.504-Larkin-Conklin vs 4-Hartman-Poley
4 ♠N44203.500.506-Rimal-Gunn vs 1-Mottet-La Berge

control 16


140130E#1

Board 17
North Deals
None Vul
A J 9 8 3
Q J 5
K Q J 5 2
K Q J 9 7 2
Q 2
10 3
A 10 4
N
WE
S
10 6 3
7 6 5
K 8 6 4
9 8 3
A 8 5 4
K 10 4
A 9 7 2
7 6

NS 6; NS 6; NS 6♣; NS 4N; NS 1♠; Par +980

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 N54500.503.501-Stone-LE BECK vs 2-Roberts-Stetson
4 N64803.001.002-Halberg-Gain vs 4-Hartman-Poley
4 N64803.001.003-Waterman-Mendell vs 1-Mottet-La Berge
4 N64803.001.004-Larkin-Conklin vs 3-Rottmayer-Koutz
4 N54500.503.505-Juarez-Cohen vs 5-Polley-Polley

control 17


140130E#1

Board 18
East Deals
N-S Vul
A 10 6
Q 7 5
10 6 3 2
Q 8 6
8
K J 10 3 2
K 9
A K 10 5 3
N
WE
S
K Q J 2
6
A Q J 8
9 7 4 2
9 7 5 4 3
A 9 8 4
7 5 4
J

W 4N; E 3N; EW 3♠; EW 3; EW 4; EW 4♣; Par −430

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW44300.503.501-Stone-LE BECK vs 2-Roberts-Stetson
3 ♣W51503.001.002-Halberg-Gain vs 4-Hartman-Poley
3 NTE34002.002.003-Waterman-Mendell vs 1-Mottet-La Berge
2 ♣W41304.000.004-Larkin-Conklin vs 3-Rottmayer-Koutz
3 NTE44300.503.505-Juarez-Cohen vs 5-Polley-Polley

control 18


140130E#1

Board 19
South Deals
E-W Vul
Q J 10 5 3
6
J 4
K Q J 9 3
K 6
K Q 9 4 3
7 3 2
10 6 4
N
WE
S
9 7 2
A J 5 2
9 8 6 5
8 2
A 8 4
10 8 7
A K Q 10
A 7 5

NS 5♠; NS 5; NS 5♣; NS 2N; EW 1; Par +450

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠N54502.501.501-Stone-LE BECK vs 2-Roberts-Stetson
3 NTS44300.004.002-Halberg-Gain vs 4-Hartman-Poley
4 ♠S54502.501.503-Waterman-Mendell vs 1-Mottet-La Berge
4 ♠S54502.501.504-Larkin-Conklin vs 3-Rottmayer-Koutz
4 ♠S54502.501.505-Juarez-Cohen vs 5-Polley-Polley

control 19


140130E#1

Board 20
West Deals
Both Vul
K 9 7
J 9 7 5 2
Q
Q J 9 2
J 10 8
Q 6
A 10 9 2
K 10 7 3
N
WE
S
A 4 3 2
8 4 3
J 7 5
8 5 4
Q 6 5
A K 10
K 8 6 4 3
A 6

NS 4; NS 3N; NS 2♠; NS 2; NS 2♣; Par +620

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTS56604.000.001-Stone-LE BECK vs 2-Roberts-Stetson
2 S31401.502.502-Halberg-Gain vs 4-Hartman-Poley
2 S31401.502.503-Waterman-Mendell vs 1-Mottet-La Berge
4 N46203.001.004-Larkin-Conklin vs 3-Rottmayer-Koutz
4 S−11000.004.005-Juarez-Cohen vs 5-Polley-Polley

control 20


140130E#1

Board 21
North Deals
N-S Vul
9 2
5 4
A J 10 9 6
10 9 8 5
10 4
Q J 9 7 2
K Q 8 7 5
6
N
WE
S
A K 8 7 3
A K 8 3
2
J 3 2
Q J 6 5
10 6
4 3
A K Q 7 4

EW 5; E 3♠; W 2♠; EW 1N; NS 2♣; EW 1; Par −450

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♠E−1503.500.502-Halberg-Gain vs 3-Rottmayer-Koutz
4 W44200.503.503-Waterman-Mendell vs 5-Polley-Polley
4 W44200.503.504-Larkin-Conklin vs 2-Roberts-Stetson
3 W41702.002.005-Juarez-Cohen vs 4-Hartman-Poley
4 ♠E−1503.500.506-Rimal-Gunn vs 6-Randolph-Hill

control 21


140130E#1

Board 22
East Deals
E-W Vul
Q 4
7 2
A Q 7 4 2
9 8 5 2
9 6 2
A K 10 4 3
9 6 5
10 4
N
WE
S
J 10 7 5 3
9 6
K J 10
A J 3
A K 8
Q J 8 5
8 3
K Q 7 6

NS 1N; S 2; NS 2♣; EW 1♠; EW 1; N 1; Par +90

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTS−1501.003.002-Halberg-Gain vs 3-Rottmayer-Koutz
1 NTS−1501.003.003-Waterman-Mendell vs 5-Polley-Polley
2 NTS−1501.003.004-Larkin-Conklin vs 2-Roberts-Stetson
2 NTS21204.000.005-Juarez-Cohen vs 4-Hartman-Poley
3 ♣S31103.001.006-Rimal-Gunn vs 6-Randolph-Hill

control 22


140130E#1

Board 23
South Deals
Both Vul
6
J 7 5 4
J 10
Q 10 9 8 6 5
10 9 5 2
Q 10
K 9 6 4 2
J 7
N
WE
S
A K 8 4
A 6 3 2
A 8 5
3 2
Q J 7 3
K 9 8
Q 7 3
A K 4

NS 1N; EW 2; NS 2♣; EW 1♠; NS 1; Par −90

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTS21204.000.002-Halberg-Gain vs 3-Rottmayer-Koutz
1 NTS1900.004.003-Waterman-Mendell vs 5-Polley-Polley
3 ♣S31102.501.504-Larkin-Conklin vs 2-Roberts-Stetson
3 ♣S31102.501.505-Juarez-Cohen vs 4-Hartman-Poley
3 W−11001.003.006-Rimal-Gunn vs 6-Randolph-Hill

control 23


140130E#1

Board 24
West Deals
None Vul
Q 8 6
9 2
K 8
K J 10 8 4 2
A 10 5
K 7 5 4 3
J 9 5 4 3
N
WE
S
4 2
A Q J 8
Q 7 2
A Q 7 3
K J 9 7 3
10 6
A 10 6
9 6 5

EW 4; EW 4; EW 1N; NS 1♠; NS 1♣; Par −420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 E31402.631.382-Halberg-Gain vs 3-Rottmayer-Koutz
4 E44200.753.253-Waterman-Mendell vs 5-Polley-Polley
4 E44200.753.254-Larkin-Conklin vs 2-Roberts-Stetson
5 W−1503.880.135-Juarez-Cohen vs 4-Hartman-Poley

control 24


140130E#1

control 25


140130E#1

control 26


140130E#1

control 27


140130E#1

control 28