Handicap Pairs Monday Eve Session December 16, 2013
Scores after  7 rounds  Average:   63.0      Section  A  North-South
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C
  7   63.66   80.21  B   1     1          1.08(A)  Nan Halberg - Pam Schrock
  1   61.20   77.11  A   2                0.76(A)  Conrad Larkin - Sally Jamison
  5   56.94   71.75  C   3     2     1    0.77(C)  Jill Kantor - Ronald Welch
 10   52.61   66.29  C   4     3     2    0.54(C)  Margery Levit - Kenneth Green
  2   52.39   66.01  C         4     3    0.39(C)  Robert Rottmayer - Mary Lyons
  8   48.35   60.92  C                             Ann Waterman - Nancy Stetson
  9   48.29   60.84  C                             Jeannette Mottet - Marjorie La Berge
  4   46.14   58.14  C                             Donna Edwards - Ann Slater
  3   41.20   51.91  C                             Lloyd Van Der Mehden - Kristin Rimal
  6   28.60   36.03  C                             Michael Aberle - Barbara McAuliffe

Handicap Pairs Monday Eve Session December 16, 2013
Scores after  7 rounds  Average:   63.0      Section  A  East-West
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C
  9   58.47   73.67  C   1     1     1    1.08(A)  John Farnsworth - Marilyn Farnsworth
  8   58.13   73.25  C   2     2     2    0.76(A)  Enid Barnes - Rich Gain
  4   55.50   69.93  C   3     3     3    0.54(A)  Janice Gullarian - Jane Bender
  3   54.17   68.26  B   4                0.38(A)  Jock Rader - Phyllis Rader
  1   49.80   62.75  A                             Kathy Juarez - Janice Hess
  6   49.75   62.69  C                             Jean O'Donnell - Christine McMahon
  2   48.83   61.52  C                             Donna Soehrens - Karen Rice
  5   44.04   55.49  C                             Sue Thue - Marlys Green
  7   31.34   39.49  C                             Gordon Larsen - Zachary Larsen



Board 1
North Deals
None Vul
6 5
A 9
J 10 9 8 2
10 9 6 4
A K Q 10
2
A K 6 5 3
7 3 2
N
WE
S
9 8 7 4
K 8 7 6 3
4
Q 8 5
J 3 2
Q J 10 5 4
Q 7
A K J

EW 2♠; NS 1N; NS 1; NS 1; NS 1♣; Par −100: NS 2N×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠E−1504.171.831-Larkin-Jamison vs 1-Juarez-Hess
2 ♠W41700.085.925-Kantor-Welch vs 8-Barnes-Gain
2 W−1504.171.837-Halberg-Schrock vs 3-Rader-Rader
3 ♠W31401.254.758-Waterman-Stetson vs 5-Thue-Green
2 W−1504.171.839-Mottet-La Berge vs 7-Larsen-Larsen
2 W−1504.171.8310-Levit-Green vs 9-Farnsworth-Farnsworth

control 1


Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul
J 8 4
Q 7 4
K 10 8 7
A K Q
5 3
9 6
A 6 5 3 2
8 5 4 2
N
WE
S
A K 9 7 2
A 10
J 9 4
10 7 3
Q 10 6
K J 8 5 3 2
Q
J 9 6

NS 2; NS 1N; EW 1; NS 1♣; Par +110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S−22000.675.331-Larkin-Jamison vs 1-Juarez-Hess
2 S21104.171.835-Kantor-Welch vs 8-Barnes-Gain
2 S21104.171.837-Halberg-Schrock vs 3-Rader-Rader
2 N21104.171.838-Waterman-Stetson vs 5-Thue-Green
2 S21104.171.839-Mottet-La Berge vs 7-Larsen-Larsen
4 S−22000.675.3310-Levit-Green vs 9-Farnsworth-Farnsworth

control 2


Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul
8 3 2
A K 10 9
A K 7
K 5 3
7 5 4
J 8 4 3 2
8 4
9 8 7
N
WE
S
A K 9
Q 7 6 5
J 6 5
A Q J
Q J 10 6
Q 10 9 3 2
10 6 4 2

NS 2N; NS 2♠; NS 3; EW 1; NS 1♣; Par +120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NT×N33805.330.671-Larkin-Jamison vs 1-Juarez-Hess
1 NTN21201.254.755-Kantor-Welch vs 8-Barnes-Gain
1 NT×N33805.330.677-Halberg-Schrock vs 3-Rader-Rader
2 NTN21201.254.758-Waterman-Stetson vs 5-Thue-Green
1 NTN21201.254.759-Mottet-La Berge vs 7-Larsen-Larsen
2 NTN41803.582.4210-Levit-Green vs 9-Farnsworth-Farnsworth

control 3


Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul
A K J 8
Q 9 8 4 2
J 4 2
Q
5
K 10 6 3
A K 10
A K 8 3 2
N
WE
S
9 6 2
7
Q 9 7 6
10 9 7 6 4
Q 10 7 4 3
A J 5
8 5 3
J 5

EW 5♣; NS 2♠; EW 3; EW 1N; NS 1; Par −600

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 N−22001.834.172-Rottmayer-Lyons vs 2-Soehrens-Rice
3 ♠S−11005.330.676-Aberle-McAuliffe vs 9-Farnsworth-Farnsworth
2 N−11005.330.677-Halberg-Schrock vs 1-Juarez-Hess
5 ♣W56000.085.928-Waterman-Stetson vs 4-Gullarian-Bender
1 ♣W51503.582.429-Mottet-La Berge vs 6-O'Donnell-McMahon
3 ♠S−22001.834.1710-Levit-Green vs 8-Barnes-Gain

control 4


Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul
7 6
K Q J 10 7 6
Q 10
6 4 3
A Q 9 3
A 4
K 7 5 3
K 10 9
N
WE
S
4 2
8 5 3
9 8 6
A Q 8 7 2
K J 10 8 5
9 2
A J 4 2
J 5

EW 3N; EW 4♣; EW 2; EW 1♠; EW 1; Par −400

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 ♠E−21005.920.082-Rottmayer-Lyons vs 2-Soehrens-Rice
4 ×N−38000.085.926-Aberle-McAuliffe vs 9-Farnsworth-Farnsworth
3 N−22001.254.757-Halberg-Schrock vs 1-Juarez-Hess
3 ♣E31102.423.588-Waterman-Stetson vs 4-Gullarian-Bender
2 N−11004.171.839-Mottet-La Berge vs 6-O'Donnell-McMahon
2 N−11004.171.8310-Levit-Green vs 8-Barnes-Gain

control 5


Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul
A 5 3 2
10 9 8 4
3
7 6 4 2
9 6 4
A J 7 6 5 2
Q 5
A 9
N
WE
S
Q 8 7
3
K J 7 6
K Q J 8 5
K J 10
K Q
A 10 9 8 4 2
10 3

E 2N; W 1N; EW 2♣; Par −120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW−11003.003.002-Rottmayer-Lyons vs 2-Soehrens-Rice
2 W−22005.330.676-Aberle-McAuliffe vs 9-Farnsworth-Farnsworth
2 W−11003.003.007-Halberg-Schrock vs 1-Juarez-Hess
3 ♣E−22005.330.678-Waterman-Stetson vs 4-Gullarian-Bender
3 NTE36000.085.929-Mottet-La Berge vs 6-O'Donnell-McMahon
3 ♣E41301.254.7510-Levit-Green vs 8-Barnes-Gain

control 6


Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul
A Q 9 6 2
A J 10 6 2
J 3
3
7
K Q 7 5
K 10 4
A 10 9 4 2
N
WE
S
K 10 8 5 3
8 4 3
Q 8
J 7 5
J 4
9
A 9 7 6 5 2
K Q 8 6

NS 2; NS 1♠; NS 1; EW 1♣; Par +90

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 NTN−22003.003.001-Larkin-Jamison vs 9-Farnsworth-Farnsworth
2 ♠S21104.751.252-Rottmayer-Lyons vs 1-Juarez-Hess
3 NTS−22003.003.003-Van Der Mehden-Rimal vs 3-Rader-Rader
4 ♠S−33001.254.758-Waterman-Stetson vs 2-Soehrens-Rice
2 NTN31505.920.089-Mottet-La Berge vs 5-Thue-Green
3 NTN−55000.085.9210-Levit-Green vs 7-Larsen-Larsen

control 7


Board 8
West Deals
None Vul
K 6 3
J 4
K 9 8
K Q 8 7 5
8 4
A K 10 7 3
A 10 4
A 9 3
N
WE
S
A 10 5 2
Q 8 6 2
J 7 6
J 6
Q J 9 7
9 5
Q 5 3 2
10 4 2

EW 3; EW 2N; EW 1♠; EW 1; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 E31403.003.001-Larkin-Jamison vs 9-Farnsworth-Farnsworth
4 E−1505.330.672-Rottmayer-Lyons vs 1-Juarez-Hess
4 E44200.085.923-Van Der Mehden-Rimal vs 3-Rader-Rader
4 E−1505.330.678-Waterman-Stetson vs 2-Soehrens-Rice
2 E41701.254.759-Mottet-La Berge vs 5-Thue-Green
2 E31403.003.0010-Levit-Green vs 7-Larsen-Larsen

control 8


Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul
Q 8
9 4
6 4
A K 8 7 5 4 2
A K 5
A 10 7 6 5 3
K 9
J 3
N
WE
S
6 3 2
8
A Q J 10 8 7 3 2
9
J 10 9 7 4
K Q J 2
5
Q 10 6

EW 6; NS 2♣; NS 1♠; EW 1; Par −1100: NS 6♠×−5; NS 7♣×−5

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 W−33005.920.081-Larkin-Jamison vs 9-Farnsworth-Farnsworth
3 ♠S−1503.003.002-Rottmayer-Lyons vs 1-Juarez-Hess
5 E56000.085.923-Van Der Mehden-Rimal vs 3-Rader-Rader
4 E51501.254.758-Waterman-Stetson vs 2-Soehrens-Rice
6 E−11004.751.259-Mottet-La Berge vs 5-Thue-Green
3 ♣N−1503.003.0010-Levit-Green vs 7-Larsen-Larsen

control 9


Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul
Q 7 6 3
A K
A 4 3 2
6 5 2
10 9 8 2
J 7 5 2
10 7
Q J 3
N
WE
S
A K J
Q 9 6
Q J 9 5
A 8 7
5 4
10 8 4 3
K 8 6
K 10 9 4

EW 1N; EW 1♠; EW 1; NS 1♣; Par −90

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTE21200.675.331-Larkin-Jamison vs 8-Barnes-Gain
1 NTE−11005.330.673-Van Der Mehden-Rimal vs 2-Soehrens-Rice
1 NTE1903.003.004-Edwards-Slater vs 4-Gullarian-Bender
1 NTE21200.675.338-Waterman-Stetson vs 1-Juarez-Hess
1 NTE1903.003.009-Mottet-La Berge vs 3-Rader-Rader
3 NTE−11005.330.6710-Levit-Green vs 6-O'Donnell-McMahon

control 10


Board 11
South Deals
None Vul
6 5 4
K 8 3 2
A 9 7 2
K 6
K J 8 7 3
9 6 5 4
J
A 8 3
N
WE
S
A Q 10 9 2
J
K Q 6 5 4
7 5
A Q 10 7
10 8 3
Q J 10 9 4 2

EW 4♠; NS 4; NS 3♣; Par −100: NS 5×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠E44203.003.001-Larkin-Jamison vs 8-Barnes-Gain
4 ♠E44203.003.003-Van Der Mehden-Rimal vs 2-Soehrens-Rice
4 ♠E44203.003.004-Edwards-Slater vs 4-Gullarian-Bender
4 ♠E44203.003.008-Waterman-Stetson vs 1-Juarez-Hess
4 ♠W44203.003.009-Mottet-La Berge vs 3-Rader-Rader
4 ♠E44203.003.0010-Levit-Green vs 6-O'Donnell-McMahon

control 11


Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul
7 5 4
K 10 3
A K J 7
9 7 4
8 2
7 5 2
9 4 2
Q J 8 6 2
N
WE
S
J 10 9 6
A 9
Q 10 5 3
A 10 3
A K Q 3
Q J 8 6 4
8 6
K 5

NS 5; NS 4♠; NS 2N; NS 2; N 1♣; Par +650

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S46205.330.671-Larkin-Jamison vs 8-Barnes-Gain
4 S46205.330.673-Van Der Mehden-Rimal vs 2-Soehrens-Rice
4 S−11001.254.754-Edwards-Slater vs 4-Gullarian-Bender
4 S−11001.254.758-Waterman-Stetson vs 1-Juarez-Hess
2 NTN−11001.254.759-Mottet-La Berge vs 3-Rader-Rader
1 NTN41803.582.4210-Levit-Green vs 6-O'Donnell-McMahon

control 12


Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul
J 10
K Q 3
K 7 6 4
J 6 4 3
8 7 2
2
J 8 2
A Q 10 7 5 2
N
WE
S
A Q 3
A 8 7 6 4
A 5 3
K 8
K 9 6 5 4
J 10 9 5
Q 10 9
9

EW 4♣; E 1N; EW 1♠; E 1; EW 1; Par −130

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 NTW−22005.001.001-Larkin-Jamison vs 7-Larsen-Larsen
3 NTE−22005.001.002-Rottmayer-Lyons vs 9-Farnsworth-Farnsworth
2 S−22000.006.003-Van Der Mehden-Rimal vs 1-Juarez-Hess
3 ♣E41301.005.004-Edwards-Slater vs 3-Rader-Rader
3 NTE−22005.001.005-Kantor-Welch vs 5-Thue-Green
3 NTE−11002.503.509-Mottet-La Berge vs 2-Soehrens-Rice
3 NTE−11002.503.5010-Levit-Green vs 4-Gullarian-Bender

control 13


Board 14
East Deals
None Vul
Q 9 3
A 8 5 2
A 7
8 5 3 2
6 5 4
Q 7
K J 8 4
A J 10 9
N
WE
S
J 10 8 7
K 10 9 4
6 5
Q 7 4
A K 2
J 6 3
Q 10 9 3 2
K 6

S 1N; NS 2; EW 1♠; S 1; EW 1♣; Par +90

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTS1903.502.501-Larkin-Jamison vs 7-Larsen-Larsen
2 N−1501.005.002-Rottmayer-Lyons vs 9-Farnsworth-Farnsworth
1 NTS1903.502.503-Van Der Mehden-Rimal vs 1-Juarez-Hess
4 N−42000.006.004-Edwards-Slater vs 3-Rader-Rader
1 NTS1903.502.505-Kantor-Welch vs 5-Thue-Green
1 NTN1903.502.509-Mottet-La Berge vs 2-Soehrens-Rice
2 NTS21206.000.0010-Levit-Green vs 4-Gullarian-Bender

control 14


Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul
K 8 2
K 7 4
A K J 5
K 7 2
A J 6 5
A 9 8
Q 9 6 4 2
3
N
WE
S
Q 10 7
Q J 6 5 2
Q J 8 6 5
9 4 3
10 3
10 8 7 3
A 10 9 4

EW 2; NS 1N; NS 2; W 1♠; NS 1♣; Par −110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 N41306.000.001-Larkin-Jamison vs 7-Larsen-Larsen
2 N2902.004.002-Rottmayer-Lyons vs 9-Farnsworth-Farnsworth
2 E31400.006.003-Van Der Mehden-Rimal vs 1-Juarez-Hess
3 E−21003.003.004-Edwards-Slater vs 3-Rader-Rader
2 E21101.005.005-Kantor-Welch vs 5-Thue-Green
1 NTN21204.501.509-Mottet-La Berge vs 2-Soehrens-Rice
1 NTN21204.501.5010-Levit-Green vs 4-Gullarian-Bender

control 15


Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul
J 10 9
A Q 10 7
K J 9 7
K 9
A Q 5 4 3
5
A 10 6 3 2
5 2
N
WE
S
8 6
K J 3
8 5 4
A J 7 6 3
K 7 2
9 8 6 4 2
Q
Q 10 8 4

EW 2♠; EW 1N; EW 2; NS 1; EW 1♣; Par −110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTE−22005.330.671-Larkin-Jamison vs 5-Thue-Green
2 S−1502.423.582-Rottmayer-Lyons vs 8-Barnes-Gain
3 S−21001.254.754-Edwards-Slater vs 2-Soehrens-Rice
2 NTE−22005.330.675-Kantor-Welch vs 4-Gullarian-Bender
2 NTE21200.085.926-Aberle-McAuliffe vs 6-O'Donnell-McMahon
2 ♠W−11003.582.4210-Levit-Green vs 3-Rader-Rader

control 16


Board 17
North Deals
None Vul
K J 8 5
A 10 8
6 4
A J 10 9
9
K Q 7
A 8 7 5 3
Q 7 5 4
N
WE
S
A 7 4
9 4 3
J 9 2
K 8 3 2
Q 10 6 3 2
J 6 5 2
K Q 10
6

NS 4♠; NS 3; NS 2N; NS 1♣; Par +420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♠S41704.751.251-Larkin-Jamison vs 5-Thue-Green
3 ♠S31401.834.172-Rottmayer-Lyons vs 8-Barnes-Gain
2 ♠S31401.834.174-Edwards-Slater vs 2-Soehrens-Rice
4 ♠S44205.920.085-Kantor-Welch vs 4-Gullarian-Bender
2 ♠S31401.834.176-Aberle-McAuliffe vs 6-O'Donnell-McMahon
2 ♠S31401.834.1710-Levit-Green vs 3-Rader-Rader

control 17


Board 18
East Deals
N-S Vul
Q 2
Q 7 6 4
10 8 6
Q 7 6 5
A K 10 9 7 6 4
K 10 8
A 3
K
N
WE
S
J 5
J 5 3 2
K J 9 5 2
J 2
8 3
A 9
Q 7 4
A 10 9 8 4 3

EW 4♠; EW 3; EW 3; NS 2♣; Par −420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠W−1505.920.081-Larkin-Jamison vs 5-Thue-Green
4 ♠W54500.085.922-Rottmayer-Lyons vs 8-Barnes-Gain
4 ♠W44201.834.174-Edwards-Slater vs 2-Soehrens-Rice
3 ♠W62303.582.425-Kantor-Welch vs 4-Gullarian-Bender
4 ♠W44201.834.176-Aberle-McAuliffe vs 6-O'Donnell-McMahon
3 ♠W41704.751.2510-Levit-Green vs 3-Rader-Rader

control 18


Board 19
South Deals
E-W Vul
K J 8 7 5
3
8 6
9 7 6 5 2
Q 10 3
4 2
K 5 2
A K Q J 4
N
WE
S
A 4
Q J 10 9 8 7
7 3
10 8 3
9 6 2
A K 6 5
A Q J 10 9 4

NS 3♠; NS 4; EW 2♣; EW 1; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 ×S−11001.005.001-Larkin-Jamison vs 4-Gullarian-Bender
3 NT×W−25006.000.002-Rottmayer-Lyons vs 6-O'Donnell-McMahon
3 E31400.006.003-Van Der Mehden-Rimal vs 9-Farnsworth-Farnsworth
4 E−22005.001.004-Edwards-Slater vs 1-Juarez-Hess
3 S−1502.004.005-Kantor-Welch vs 3-Rader-Rader
3 ♣W−11003.003.006-Aberle-McAuliffe vs 5-Thue-Green
2 S31104.002.007-Halberg-Schrock vs 7-Larsen-Larsen

control 19


Board 20
West Deals
Both Vul
J 7 5
A J 9 7 6 5 2
A 9 2
A 8 6 4 2
A K Q 6 5 4
6 3
N
WE
S
Q 10
K 8 4
10 8 2
K Q J 5 4
K 9 3
Q 10 3
J 9 7 3
10 8 7

EW 3♠; EW 4; EW 4♣; NS 2; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠W−11003.502.501-Larkin-Jamison vs 4-Gullarian-Bender
3 W51502.004.002-Rottmayer-Lyons vs 6-O'Donnell-McMahon
4 N−22001.005.003-Van Der Mehden-Rimal vs 9-Farnsworth-Farnsworth
3 NTE−22005.500.504-Edwards-Slater vs 1-Juarez-Hess
4 ♠W−11003.502.505-Kantor-Welch vs 3-Rader-Rader
5 W66200.006.006-Aberle-McAuliffe vs 5-Thue-Green
5 W−22005.500.507-Halberg-Schrock vs 7-Larsen-Larsen

control 20


Board 21
North Deals
N-S Vul
6 2
K J 10 9 8
K J 8
9 3 2
A 9 5 4
Q 7 5
9 4 3
10 6 5
N
WE
S
K Q J 8 7
A
A Q 10 7 5 2
A
10 3
6 4 3 2
6
K Q J 8 7 4

EW 7N; EW 7♠; EW 7; NS 2; NS 2♣; Par −1520

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6 ♠W69800.006.001-Larkin-Jamison vs 4-Gullarian-Bender
4 ♠E54504.002.002-Rottmayer-Lyons vs 6-O'Donnell-McMahon
4 ♠E64802.004.003-Van Der Mehden-Rimal vs 9-Farnsworth-Farnsworth
4 ♠E64802.004.004-Edwards-Slater vs 1-Juarez-Hess
4 E61706.000.005-Kantor-Welch vs 3-Rader-Rader
4 ♠E64802.004.006-Aberle-McAuliffe vs 5-Thue-Green
3 ♠E52005.001.007-Halberg-Schrock vs 7-Larsen-Larsen

control 21


Board 22
East Deals
E-W Vul
J 2
A 2
K J 8 4
A K Q 4 2
10 9 3
K Q J 7
6 3 2
9 6 3
N
WE
S
Q 8 7
10 8 4 3
Q 9 7
J 7 5
A K 6 5 4
9 6 5
A 10 5
10 8

NS 7; NS 7♣; NS 6N; NS 5♠; NS 4; Par +1440

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠S64802.423.582-Rottmayer-Lyons vs 5-Thue-Green
3 NTS75205.920.083-Van Der Mehden-Rimal vs 7-Larsen-Larsen
3 NTS64904.171.835-Kantor-Welch vs 2-Soehrens-Rice
3 N51500.085.926-Aberle-McAuliffe vs 4-Gullarian-Bender
3 NTN64904.171.837-Halberg-Schrock vs 6-O'Donnell-McMahon
4 ♠S54501.254.758-Waterman-Stetson vs 8-Barnes-Gain

control 22


Board 23
South Deals
Both Vul
A Q J 9 8 7 6
A K 8
9 7
5
J 9 5
A 6 4 3 2
K 10 9 8 3
N
WE
S
10 4 2
Q 10 7 6 2
Q 10
A J 6
K 5 3
4 3
K J 8 5
Q 7 4 2

NS 5♠; EW 2; NS 1N; EW 2♣; EW 1; Par +650

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠N56504.751.252-Rottmayer-Lyons vs 5-Thue-Green
4 ♠N46201.834.173-Van Der Mehden-Rimal vs 7-Larsen-Larsen
4 ♠S56504.751.255-Kantor-Welch vs 2-Soehrens-Rice
5 ♠N−11000.085.926-Aberle-McAuliffe vs 4-Gullarian-Bender
4 ♠N46201.834.177-Halberg-Schrock vs 6-O'Donnell-McMahon
5 ♠N56504.751.258-Waterman-Stetson vs 8-Barnes-Gain

control 23


Board 24
West Deals
None Vul
6 5 3 2
K 5
Q 10 8 6 2
A 10
A K J 9 7
A J 10 9
J 4 3
J
N
WE
S
4
8 7 6 4
K 9 7
9 8 5 4 3
Q 10 8
Q 3 2
A 5
K Q 7 6 2

EW 2; S 1♠; S 1; NS 1♣; Par −100: S 2♠×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 W21101.254.752-Rottmayer-Lyons vs 5-Thue-Green
4 ♠W−21005.920.083-Van Der Mehden-Rimal vs 7-Larsen-Larsen
2 ♣S2904.751.255-Kantor-Welch vs 2-Soehrens-Rice
3 W31400.085.926-Aberle-McAuliffe vs 4-Gullarian-Bender
2 W−1503.582.427-Halberg-Schrock vs 6-O'Donnell-McMahon
3 NTS−1502.423.588-Waterman-Stetson vs 8-Barnes-Gain

control 24


Board 25
North Deals
E-W Vul
K 8 5 3
8 2
K 9 5
A J 4 2
9 7 2
4 3
J 10 8 4 2
8 7 3
N
WE
S
6 4
A 9 6
7 6 3
K Q 10 9 5
A Q J 10
K Q J 10 7 5
A Q
6

NS 6♠; NS 6; N 5N; S 4N; NS 2; NS 2♣; Par +980

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6 ♠S69805.500.503-Van Der Mehden-Rimal vs 6-O'Donnell-McMahon
6 NTN−1500.006.004-Edwards-Slater vs 8-Barnes-Gain
4 ♠N54502.004.005-Kantor-Welch vs 1-Juarez-Hess
4 S64803.502.506-Aberle-McAuliffe vs 3-Rader-Rader
6 ♠N69805.500.507-Halberg-Schrock vs 5-Thue-Green
4 S64803.502.508-Waterman-Stetson vs 7-Larsen-Larsen
4 ♠S44201.005.009-Mottet-La Berge vs 9-Farnsworth-Farnsworth

control 25


Board 26
East Deals
Both Vul
A J 2
K J 9 3
9 3
K Q 5 2
K Q 10 9 8 7 6 3
K Q 10
7 3
N
WE
S
5 4
Q 8 7 6 4 2
A J 6
J 6
A 10 5
8 7 5 4 2
A 10 9 8 4

NS 4N; EW 3♠; NS 2; NS 3; NS 3♣; Par +500: EW 5♠×−2

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♠W31400.505.503-Van Der Mehden-Rimal vs 6-O'Donnell-McMahon
4 ♣N51506.000.004-Edwards-Slater vs 8-Barnes-Gain
4 ♠E−11003.003.005-Kantor-Welch vs 1-Juarez-Hess
4 ♠W−11003.003.006-Aberle-McAuliffe vs 3-Rader-Rader
4 ♠W−11003.003.007-Halberg-Schrock vs 5-Thue-Green
4 ♣S41305.001.008-Waterman-Stetson vs 7-Larsen-Larsen
3 ♠W31400.505.509-Mottet-La Berge vs 9-Farnsworth-Farnsworth

control 26


Board 27
South Deals
None Vul
K J 7 6 4
A Q J 8
K J 9 8
A K Q J 5 2
Q
6 5 4
A Q 10
N
WE
S
10 8 7 4 3
A 8 5 2
2
6 5 4
9 6
10 9 3
K 10 9 7 3
7 3 2

EW 4♠; NS 3; NS 4; EW 2N; NS 1♣; Par −100: NS 5×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠W54501.504.503-Van Der Mehden-Rimal vs 6-O'Donnell-McMahon
4 ♠W54501.504.504-Edwards-Slater vs 8-Barnes-Gain
4 ♠W44204.501.505-Kantor-Welch vs 1-Juarez-Hess
4 ♠W54501.504.506-Aberle-McAuliffe vs 3-Rader-Rader
4 ♠W44204.501.507-Halberg-Schrock vs 5-Thue-Green
2 ♠W52006.000.008-Waterman-Stetson vs 7-Larsen-Larsen
4 ♠W54501.504.509-Mottet-La Berge vs 9-Farnsworth-Farnsworth

control 27


Board 28
West Deals
N-S Vul
7 3
A Q 4 2
8 2
K J 9 4 3
A Q J 5
J 9 8 5
Q 10 9
8 6
N
WE
S
K 8 2
10 6 3
J 7 6 5 3
A Q
10 9 6 4
K 7
A K 4
10 7 5 2

NS 3♣; EW 2; EW 1♠; Par +100: EW 3×−1

ContractByScoresMatchpointsPairs
  N-SE-WN-SE-W 
PassPass3.003.004-Edwards-Slater vs 7-Larsen-Larsen
PassPass3.003.005-Kantor-Welch vs 9-Farnsworth-Farnsworth
PassPass3.003.006-Aberle-McAuliffe vs 2-Soehrens-Rice
PassPass3.003.007-Halberg-Schrock vs 4-Gullarian-Bender
PassPass3.003.008-Waterman-Stetson vs 6-O'Donnell-McMahon
PassPass3.003.009-Mottet-La Berge vs 8-Barnes-Gain

control 28


Board 29
North Deals
Both Vul
A 10 6 3
J 10 8 5 4
10 6 3 2
A K 7 4 3
Q 8 2
J 8 7 5 4
N
WE
S
10 6 5 2
K 7 5
A 9 6 3 2
A
Q J 9 8
J 9 4
K Q 7
K Q 9

EW 4♠; NS 2N; NS 2; NS 1♣; Par −500: NS 4N×−2

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 ♠W21105.920.084-Edwards-Slater vs 7-Larsen-Larsen
2 ♠W41701.834.175-Kantor-Welch vs 9-Farnsworth-Farnsworth
4 ♠W46200.085.926-Aberle-McAuliffe vs 2-Soehrens-Rice
2 ♠W31404.171.837-Halberg-Schrock vs 4-Gullarian-Bender
2 ♠W41701.834.178-Waterman-Stetson vs 6-O'Donnell-McMahon
3 ♠W31404.171.839-Mottet-La Berge vs 8-Barnes-Gain

control 29


Board 30
East Deals
None Vul
Q J 7 5 3 2
K J 7
4
Q J 5
8 6
10 8 6
7 6 3 2
8 7 4 3
N
WE
S
A K 10 4
Q 9 3
Q 10
K 9 6 2
9
A 5 4 2
A K J 9 8 5
A 10

N 5N; NS 5; S 4N; NS 4♠; NS 5; NS 1♣; Par +460

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTS34004.751.254-Edwards-Slater vs 7-Larsen-Larsen
2 ♠N41702.423.585-Kantor-Welch vs 9-Farnsworth-Farnsworth
2 ♠N31400.085.926-Aberle-McAuliffe vs 2-Soehrens-Rice
2 S51501.254.757-Halberg-Schrock vs 4-Gullarian-Bender
3 NTN44305.920.088-Waterman-Stetson vs 6-O'Donnell-McMahon
2 NTS41803.582.429-Mottet-La Berge vs 8-Barnes-Gain

control 30