Thursday Evening Pairs Thursday Eve Session November 7, 2013
Scores after  5 rounds  Average:   40.0      Section  A  North-South
Pair    Pct   Score  Rank   HNDCP   Total  Rank   MPs
  2   57.08   45.66   1      8.75   54.41   1    0.60     Nancy Stetson - Judy Carico
  4   46.73   37.38   2     15.87   53.25   2    0.42     Mary Hartman - Stephanie Poley
  1   44.09   35.27         14.02   49.29                 Kenneth Koutz - Robert Rottmayer
  5   41.26   33.01         14.11   47.12                 Ann Waterman - Doris Mendell
  6   66.36   53.09  NE      0.00   53.09                 Nancy Gunn - Abbe Cohen
  3   47.05   37.64  NE      0.00   37.64                 Randee Dimond - Janice Gullarian

Thursday Evening Pairs Thursday Eve Session November 7, 2013
Scores after  5 rounds  Average:   40.0      Section  A  East-West
Pair    Pct   Score  Rank   HNDCP   Total  Rank   MPs
  1   59.85   47.88   2     15.01   62.89   1    0.42     Douglas Schrock - Pam Schrock
  5   60.25   48.20   1     10.07   58.27   2    0.60     Jan Conklin - Conrad Larkin
  2   45.95   36.76         17.70   54.46                 Barbara McAuliffe - Jeannette Mottet
  4   45.01   36.01         10.98   46.99                 Karen Rice - Ann Slater
  3   40.18   32.14         12.04   44.18                 Enid Barnes - Rich Gain
  6   49.83   39.86  NE      0.00   39.86                 Kate Hill - Randy Randolph



131107E#1

Board 1
North Deals
None Vul
5 4 2
K Q 5 2
A 10 4 3
A 8
K
J 10 8
K 9 2
Q 10 5 4 3 2
N
WE
S
7 6 3
9 7 6
Q 7 6
J 9 7 6
A Q J 10 9 8
A 4 3
J 8 5
K

NS 7N; NS 7♠; NS 7; NS 5; NS 2♣; Par +1520

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠S64802.501.501-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 1-Schrock-Schrock
4 ♠S64802.501.503-Dimond-Gullarian vs 4-Rice-Slater
5 ♠S75104.000.004-Hartman-Poley vs 6-Hill-Randolph
2 ♠S52000.004.005-Waterman-Mendell vs 3-Barnes-Gain
4 ♠S54501.003.006-Gunn-Cohen vs 5-Conklin-Larkin

control 1


131107E#1

Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul
Q 9
A 10 9
A 9 8 6
J 8 7 4
10 8 7 4 2
Q 7 6 4
5 3
K 10
N
WE
S
A K 6 5
8 5
K Q J 7 2
Q 2
J 3
K J 3 2
10 4
A 9 6 5 3

EW 3♠; N 2; NS 3♣; EW 2; S 1; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S−55000.133.881-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 1-Schrock-Schrock
3 ♠W31403.250.753-Dimond-Gullarian vs 4-Rice-Slater
4 E44201.382.634-Hartman-Poley vs 6-Hill-Randolph
3 ♠W31403.250.755-Waterman-Mendell vs 3-Barnes-Gain

control 2


131107E#1

Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul
K
10 9 8
K 10 5 3
Q J 9 7 6
Q J 9 8 5 3
5 4
Q 9 8
8 2
N
WE
S
10 7 2
A K J 7 6
J 4 2
5 3
A 6 4
Q 3 2
A 7 6
A K 10 4

NS 4N; NS 2; NS 3; NS 3♣; EW 1♠; Par +430

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♣S31100.004.001-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 1-Schrock-Schrock
3 NTS34002.501.503-Dimond-Gullarian vs 4-Rice-Slater
4 ♠W−33001.003.004-Hartman-Poley vs 6-Hill-Randolph
3 NTS54604.000.005-Waterman-Mendell vs 3-Barnes-Gain
3 NTS34002.501.506-Gunn-Cohen vs 5-Conklin-Larkin

control 3


131107E#1

Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul
J 5
Q J 8 4
A 6
A Q 9 6 5
K Q 2
A K 7 5 3
J 5
7 4 2
N
WE
S
10 9 8
9 2
K Q 10 8 4 3
K 3
A 7 6 4 3
10 6
9 7 2
J 10 8

EW 3; NS 2♣; EW 1♠; EW 1; Par −110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 NTN−55000.004.001-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 1-Schrock-Schrock
3 ♣N−11002.002.003-Dimond-Gullarian vs 4-Rice-Slater
3 E41301.003.004-Hartman-Poley vs 6-Hill-Randolph
2 NTW−33004.000.005-Waterman-Mendell vs 3-Barnes-Gain
2 W−11003.001.006-Gunn-Cohen vs 5-Conklin-Larkin

control 4


131107E#1

Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul
J 9 8 3
J 10 9
J 3
Q J 10 9
K 10 2
A 7 4 2
9 8 5
K 5 2
N
WE
S
A Q 7 6 5
Q 6 5 3
K 10 4 2
4
K 8
A Q 7 6
A 8 7 6 4 3

EW 3♠; EW 3; NS 4♣; EW 2; Par +100: EW 4×−1; EW 4♠×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠E−21003.500.501-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 6-Hill-Randolph
4 ♠E−1501.502.502-Stetson-Carico vs 2-McAuliffe-Mottet
3 ♠E31400.004.004-Hartman-Poley vs 5-Conklin-Larkin
3 ♠E−1501.502.505-Waterman-Mendell vs 1-Schrock-Schrock
4 ♠W−21003.500.506-Gunn-Cohen vs 4-Rice-Slater

control 5


131107E#1

Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul
A 9 8 5 4 3
A K Q 9
A 10
6
K J 7
7
9 8 4
A Q 9 8 5 3
N
WE
S
Q 10 2
J 10 6 4
J 7 6 5
J 4
6
8 5 3 2
K Q 3 2
K 10 7 2

NS 5; NS 3♠; NS 2N; NS 2; S 2♣; N 1♣; Par +450

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ×N46304.000.001-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 6-Hill-Randolph
3 N41701.502.502-Stetson-Carico vs 2-McAuliffe-Mottet
2 N41701.502.504-Hartman-Poley vs 5-Conklin-Larkin
3 NTS−1500.004.005-Waterman-Mendell vs 1-Schrock-Schrock
4 S44203.001.006-Gunn-Cohen vs 4-Rice-Slater

control 6


131107E#1

Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul
K J 10 6 5
9
Q 10 9 7 3 2
7
A Q 7 4
A J 8 7 6 5
8
A 9
N
WE
S
9 8 2
K Q 3 2
A 5
J 6 4 2
3
10 4
K J 6 4
K Q 10 8 5 3

W 5; E 4; EW 3N; EW 3♠; NS 3; EW 1♣; Par −650

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 W56500.004.001-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 6-Hill-Randolph
3 W41702.002.002-Stetson-Carico vs 2-McAuliffe-Mottet
6 W−11003.500.504-Hartman-Poley vs 5-Conklin-Larkin
4 ♠W−11003.500.505-Waterman-Mendell vs 1-Schrock-Schrock
4 W46201.003.006-Gunn-Cohen vs 4-Rice-Slater

control 7


131107E#1

Board 8
West Deals
None Vul
K J 10 6
J 6 2
A J 7 5 4 2
K Q J 10 9 3 2
9
K Q
K Q 10
N
WE
S
A 8 5
A 7 5 3
A 10 9 4
9 8
7 6 4
Q 8 4 2
8 7 5 3
6 3

EW 6N; EW 6♠; EW 2; NS 1♣; Par −990

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♠W62304.000.001-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 6-Hill-Randolph
4 ♠W54503.001.002-Stetson-Carico vs 2-McAuliffe-Mottet
5 ♠W64801.003.004-Hartman-Poley vs 5-Conklin-Larkin
4 ♠W64801.003.005-Waterman-Mendell vs 1-Schrock-Schrock
4 ♠W64801.003.006-Gunn-Cohen vs 4-Rice-Slater

control 8


131107E#1

Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul
Q 9 6
K 8 7
K Q 10 7
Q J 9
A K 8 7
A 9
3 2
K 10 8 6 4
N
WE
S
5 4 3
Q 10 6 4
A 9 6
7 5 3
J 10 2
J 5 3 2
J 8 5 4
A 2

EW 1N; EW 2♣; EW 1♠; W 1; NS 1; Par −90

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTN−21000.503.501-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 5-Conklin-Larkin
2 N−21000.503.502-Stetson-Carico vs 1-Schrock-Schrock
2 ♠W−11002.501.503-Dimond-Gullarian vs 3-Barnes-Gain
1 ♠W−11002.501.505-Waterman-Mendell vs 6-Hill-Randolph
1 NTS21204.000.006-Gunn-Cohen vs 2-McAuliffe-Mottet

control 9


131107E#1

Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul
K 9 7 5 4
4
10 7 6 5 4
5 3
J 6 3 2
6 5 2
K Q 9 8
K 8
N
WE
S
A
K Q 9 8 7 3
J 3
J 10 7 2
Q 10 8
A J 10
A 2
A Q 9 6 4

NS 3♠; E 3; NS 2N; W 2; NS 2; NS 1♣; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ×E37300.004.001-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 5-Conklin-Larkin
4 ×E−12004.000.002-Stetson-Carico vs 1-Schrock-Schrock
2 E31401.502.503-Dimond-Gullarian vs 3-Barnes-Gain
3 E31401.502.505-Waterman-Mendell vs 6-Hill-Randolph
4 ♠N−11003.001.006-Gunn-Cohen vs 2-McAuliffe-Mottet

control 10


131107E#1

Board 11
South Deals
None Vul
K 10 9 3
9 6
A K J
J 10 8 2
J 8 7 6 2
A 7 2
10 8
A 9 7
N
WE
S
A Q 5
J
9 7 6 4 2
Q 6 5 4
4
K Q 10 8 5 4 3
Q 5 3
K 3

NS 4; N 2N; EW 2♠; S 1N; EW 1; Par +300: EW 4♠×−2

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 S41702.501.501-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 5-Conklin-Larkin
4 S−1500.004.002-Stetson-Carico vs 1-Schrock-Schrock
4 S44204.000.003-Dimond-Gullarian vs 3-Barnes-Gain
4 ♠W−31501.003.005-Waterman-Mendell vs 6-Hill-Randolph
3 S41702.501.506-Gunn-Cohen vs 2-McAuliffe-Mottet

control 11


131107E#1

Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul
J 10 6
A K 7 5
8 5 2
J 9 6
K 9 5 3 2
8 2
Q J 9
A 3 2
N
WE
S
A Q 8 7 4
J 9 6 4
A
K Q 8
Q 10 3
K 10 7 6 4 3
10 7 5 4

EW 5♠; EW 3N; EW 2; NS 2; EW 2♣; Par −450

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠E54500.753.252-Stetson-Carico vs 1-Schrock-Schrock
4 ♠E44202.631.383-Dimond-Gullarian vs 3-Barnes-Gain
4 ♠E54500.753.255-Waterman-Mendell vs 6-Hill-Randolph
3 ♠E52003.880.136-Gunn-Cohen vs 2-McAuliffe-Mottet

control 12


131107E#1

Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul
8
A K J 8 2
7 6 5 2
10 5 3
7 2
Q 9 6
K 9 8 4
K 9 7 2
N
WE
S
Q 10 9 5 4
7
A J 10 3
Q 6 4
A K J 6 3
10 5 4 3
Q
A J 8

NS 5; NS 3N; NS 2♠; EW 1; NS 1♣; Par +650

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 ♠S21101.003.001-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 3-Barnes-Gain
3 N52003.001.002-Stetson-Carico vs 6-Hill-Randolph
2 S41702.002.003-Dimond-Gullarian vs 2-McAuliffe-Mottet
3 N−11000.004.004-Hartman-Poley vs 4-Rice-Slater
4 S46204.000.006-Gunn-Cohen vs 1-Schrock-Schrock

control 13


131107E#1

Board 14
East Deals
None Vul
8 7 5
Q 6 5 2
10 8 6 5 2
5
A 4 2
J 4
Q 4
A J 10 7 4 2
N
WE
S
J 10 9
A 10 8 7
K J 3
Q 9 8
K Q 6 3
K 9 3
A 9 7
K 6 3

EW 4N; EW 4♣; EW 2; EW 1♠; EW 1; Par −430

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 ♣S−31502.002.001-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 3-Barnes-Gain
1 ♣S−31502.002.002-Stetson-Carico vs 6-Hill-Randolph
1 NTS−42000.004.003-Dimond-Gullarian vs 2-McAuliffe-Mottet
2 ♣W51502.002.004-Hartman-Poley vs 4-Rice-Slater
2 ♣W41304.000.006-Gunn-Cohen vs 1-Schrock-Schrock

control 14


131107E#1

Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul
A 10 6 2
7 6 5 3
K 7 6 2
10
Q 8
K J
A 8 3
A K J 9 7 6
N
WE
S
J 7 5 3
10 9 4 2
Q J 4
8 2
K 9 4
A Q 8
10 9 5
Q 5 4 3

EW 1N; EW 2♣; NS 1♠; NS 1; NS 1; Par −90

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 NTW−1503.500.501-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 3-Barnes-Gain
3 NTW34000.004.002-Stetson-Carico vs 6-Hill-Randolph
2 ♣W2902.002.003-Dimond-Gullarian vs 2-McAuliffe-Mottet
2 NTW−1503.500.504-Hartman-Poley vs 4-Rice-Slater
2 S−11001.003.006-Gunn-Cohen vs 1-Schrock-Schrock

control 15


131107E#1

Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul
A K 8 4 3
5
7 5 2
8 4 3 2
9 6 2
A 7 2
J 6 4
K 9 7 6
N
WE
S
Q 10 7
9 8
K Q 10 8 3
A J 10
J 5
K Q J 10 6 4 3
A 9
Q 5

NS 3; EW 2; EW 1♣; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 S−1501.382.631-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 3-Barnes-Gain
4 S−21000.133.883-Dimond-Gullarian vs 2-McAuliffe-Mottet
2 S31403.250.754-Hartman-Poley vs 4-Rice-Slater
3 S31403.250.756-Gunn-Cohen vs 1-Schrock-Schrock

control 16


131107E#1

Board 17
North Deals
None Vul
A K 6
8 4
Q J 10 6
A 6 4 2
10 7 4 3 2
Q 10 6 5
4 2
Q 9
N
WE
S
9
J 9 3
A K 8 5
K J 10 5 3
Q J 8 5
A K 7 2
9 7 3
8 7

NS 2♠; NS 1N; NS 2; NS 1; Par +110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♠N31403.001.001-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 2-McAuliffe-Mottet
3 NTN34004.000.002-Stetson-Carico vs 4-Rice-Slater
3 ♠N−1501.003.003-Dimond-Gullarian vs 1-Schrock-Schrock
3 N−1501.003.004-Hartman-Poley vs 3-Barnes-Gain
2 NTN−1501.003.005-Waterman-Mendell vs 5-Conklin-Larkin

control 17


131107E#1

Board 18
East Deals
N-S Vul
Q 2
K J 3
K J 10 7
A 10 7 5
A J 9 6 5
Q 10 9 7 2
8 5
K
N
WE
S
K 10 7
Q 9 3
Q J 9 8 6 3 2
8 4 3
A 8 6 5 4
A 6 4 2
4

NS 2N; W 2♠; NS 2; NS 3; EW 2♣; E 1♠; Par +100: W 3♠×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 ♠W21102.002.001-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 2-McAuliffe-Mottet
3 ♠W−1503.001.002-Stetson-Carico vs 4-Rice-Slater
4 S−22000.004.003-Dimond-Gullarian vs 1-Schrock-Schrock
3 ♣E41301.003.004-Hartman-Poley vs 3-Barnes-Gain
4 ♠W−31504.000.005-Waterman-Mendell vs 5-Conklin-Larkin

control 18


131107E#1

Board 19
South Deals
E-W Vul
A 10 7 2
Q 9 6 3
K 4 2
A 7
3
J 10 8 5 4
J 10 5 3
J 8 2
N
WE
S
K J 4
A K 7
A 8 6
10 9 6 4
Q 9 8 6 5
2
Q 9 7
K Q 5 3

NS 4♠; N 3N; S 2N; N 2♣; EW 1; S 1; S 1♣; Par +420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 N−1501.502.501-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 2-McAuliffe-Mottet
1 ♠S31403.001.002-Stetson-Carico vs 4-Rice-Slater
3 ♠S41704.000.003-Dimond-Gullarian vs 1-Schrock-Schrock
3 N−42000.004.004-Hartman-Poley vs 3-Barnes-Gain
4 ♠S−1501.502.505-Waterman-Mendell vs 5-Conklin-Larkin

control 19


131107E#1

Board 20
West Deals
Both Vul
9 7
K 10 7
7 6 5 3 2
J 6 3
A J 6
A J 6 5 4
K 4
K 7 5
N
WE
S
10 5 4 3
8 2
J 10 9
A 10 9 2
K Q 8 2
Q 9 3
A Q 8
Q 8 4

EW 2♠; EW 2; EW 2♣; NS 1; Par −110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 N−11002.002.001-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 2-McAuliffe-Mottet
1 NTW1903.001.002-Stetson-Carico vs 4-Rice-Slater
2 W21101.003.003-Dimond-Gullarian vs 1-Schrock-Schrock
1 NTW−22004.000.004-Hartman-Poley vs 3-Barnes-Gain
1 NTW31500.004.005-Waterman-Mendell vs 5-Conklin-Larkin

control 20


131107E#1

Board 21
North Deals
N-S Vul
A Q 10 8
A J 8 5
Q 6 5
A K
K 9 6
K 2
K 10 9 4 2
J 4 2
N
WE
S
J 5 4
Q 10 9 7 4 3
Q 9 7 5
7 3 2
6
A J 8 7 3
10 8 6 3

N 4♠; S 3♠; NS 4; NS 2N; NS 2♣; N 1; Par +620

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTN−11003.001.002-Stetson-Carico vs 3-Barnes-Gain
3 NTN−22001.003.003-Dimond-Gullarian vs 5-Conklin-Larkin
3 N41304.000.004-Hartman-Poley vs 2-McAuliffe-Mottet
3 NTN−22001.003.005-Waterman-Mendell vs 4-Rice-Slater
4 S−22001.003.006-Gunn-Cohen vs 6-Hill-Randolph

control 21


131107E#1

Board 22
East Deals
E-W Vul
8 7 5 4
A
J 7 4 2
A 10 5 4
K 10 3 2
Q 9 5 4 2
9 6
Q 3
N
WE
S
A J
10 8 6
8 5 3
K J 9 7 2
Q 9 6
K J 7 3
A K Q 10
8 6

NS 2♠; NS 3; NS 1N; EW 1; NS 1♣; Par +110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 ♠N21102.002.002-Stetson-Carico vs 3-Barnes-Gain
2 NTS21203.500.503-Dimond-Gullarian vs 5-Conklin-Larkin
3 S−42000.004.004-Hartman-Poley vs 2-McAuliffe-Mottet
3 NTN−21001.003.005-Waterman-Mendell vs 4-Rice-Slater
2 NTS21203.500.506-Gunn-Cohen vs 6-Hill-Randolph

control 22


131107E#1

Board 23
South Deals
Both Vul
K 10
K 10 9 7 5
K Q 9 7 6 4
J 9 6 5 3
8 4 2
8 2
A K 2
N
WE
S
Q 8
A J 6 3
A J 5 3
9 8 5
A 7 4 2
Q
10
Q J 10 7 6 4 3

NS 2; NS 3; W 1N; NS 2♣; Par +110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♣S31103.880.132-Stetson-Carico vs 3-Barnes-Gain
4 ♣S−11002.002.003-Dimond-Gullarian vs 5-Conklin-Larkin
3 ♣S−11002.002.004-Hartman-Poley vs 2-McAuliffe-Mottet
2 NTS−44000.133.885-Waterman-Mendell vs 4-Rice-Slater

control 23


131107E#1

Board 24
West Deals
None Vul
Q J 2
A J 10 9 5 4
A K J 5
K 10 7 5 3
K 7
10 9 7
Q 7 3
N
WE
S
A 9 6
Q 3
A Q 6 4
10 8 4 2
8 4
8 6 2
K J 8 5 3 2
9 6

NS 3; NS 1N; NS 2♣; EW 1♠; NS 1; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 N41703.250.752-Stetson-Carico vs 3-Barnes-Gain
4 N−1500.133.883-Dimond-Gullarian vs 5-Conklin-Larkin
1 N41703.250.754-Hartman-Poley vs 2-McAuliffe-Mottet
1 N31401.382.635-Waterman-Mendell vs 4-Rice-Slater

control 24


131107E#1

control 25


131107E#1

control 26


131107E#1

control 27


131107E#1

control 28