Thursday Evening Pairs Thursday Eve Session October 24, 2013 Scores after 7 rounds Average: 63.0 Section A North-South Pair Pct Score Rank HNDCP Total Rank MPs 3 62.63 78.92 1 11.76 90.68 1 0.70 Nan Halberg - Rich Gain 2 57.92 72.98 2 14.98 87.96 2 0.49 Judy Carico - Nancy Stetson 1 50.13 63.17 3 21.33 84.50 3 0.35 Kenneth Koutz - Robert Rottmayer 4 37.90 47.75 26.74 74.49 Barbara McAuliffe - Jeannette Mottet 6 39.82 50.17 22.24 72.41 Mike Ferrel - Peg Ferrel 5 34.98 44.08 19.85 63.93 Ann Waterman - Doris Mendell 7 67.00 84.42 NE 0.00 84.42 Jan Conklin - Nancy Gunn Thursday Evening Pairs Thursday Eve Session October 24, 2013 Scores after 7 rounds Average: 63.0 Section A East-West Pair Pct Score Rank HNDCP Total Rank MPs 3 54.83 69.08 2 23.10 92.18 1 0.49 Enid Barnes - Rob Granshaw 1 51.06 64.33 24.97 89.30 2 0.25 Judy Sitzman - Doris Beckert 5 58.20 73.33 1 11.68 85.01 3 0.70 Donna Soehrens - Karen Rice 2 46.49 58.58 24.27 82.85 Margie Smith - Gus Beckert 4 52.18 65.75 3 15.09 80.84 0.35 Jane Bender - Kathy Juarez 6 49.94 62.92 9.88 72.80 Jock Rader - Phyllis Rader 7 36.67 46.20 NE 0.00 46.20 Kate Hill - Randy Randolph
Board 1 North Deals None Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EW 6♦; EW 5N; EW 4♠; EW 3♥; EW 2♣; Par −920
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
3 NT | E | 5 | 460 | 1.50 | 4.50 | 1-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 1-Sitzman-Beckert | ||
3 NT | E | −1 | 50 | 6.00 | 0.00 | 2-Carico-Stetson vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw | ||
3 NT | E | 5 | 460 | 1.50 | 4.50 | 3-Halberg-Gain vs 5-Soehrens-Rice | ||
3 NT | E | 5 | 460 | 1.50 | 4.50 | 4-McAuliffe-Mottet vs 7-Hill-Randolph | ||
3 NT | E | 4 | 430 | 4.00 | 2.00 | 5-Waterman-Mendell vs 2-Smith-Beckert | ||
3 NT | E | 5 | 460 | 1.50 | 4.50 | 6-Ferrel-Ferrel vs 4-Bender-Juarez | ||
3 ♦ | E | 5 | 150 | 5.00 | 1.00 | 7-Conklin-Gunn vs 6-Rader-Rader |
control 1
Board 2 East Deals N-S Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EW 3♥; EW 3♣; EW 1N; EW 2♦; NS 1♠; Par −140
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
3 ♠ | N | 3 | 140 | 4.00 | 2.00 | 1-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 1-Sitzman-Beckert | ||
2 ♠ | N | 3 | 140 | 4.00 | 2.00 | 2-Carico-Stetson vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw | ||
2 ♠ | N | 4 | 170 | 6.00 | 0.00 | 3-Halberg-Gain vs 5-Soehrens-Rice | ||
3 NT | E | 3 | 400 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 4-McAuliffe-Mottet vs 7-Hill-Randolph | ||
2 ♣ | W | 3 | 110 | 2.00 | 4.00 | 5-Waterman-Mendell vs 2-Smith-Beckert | ||
2 ♠ | N | −2 | 200 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 6-Ferrel-Ferrel vs 4-Bender-Juarez | ||
2 ♠ | N | 3 | 140 | 4.00 | 2.00 | 7-Conklin-Gunn vs 6-Rader-Rader |
control 2
Board 3 South Deals E-W Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 3♥; EW 2♠; NS 3♦; NS 1N; EW 2♣; Par +140
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
3 ♠ | E | −1 | 100 | 3.50 | 2.50 | 1-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 1-Sitzman-Beckert | ||
3 ♠ | E | 4 | 170 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 2-Carico-Stetson vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw | ||
3 ♠ | E | 3 | 140 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 3-Halberg-Gain vs 5-Soehrens-Rice | ||
4 ♠ | E | −2 | 200 | 5.50 | 0.50 | 4-McAuliffe-Mottet vs 7-Hill-Randolph | ||
2 ♠ | E | 2 | 110 | 2.00 | 4.00 | 5-Waterman-Mendell vs 2-Smith-Beckert | ||
4 ♠ | E | −1 | 100 | 3.50 | 2.50 | 6-Ferrel-Ferrel vs 4-Bender-Juarez | ||
4 ♠ | E | −2 | 200 | 5.50 | 0.50 | 7-Conklin-Gunn vs 6-Rader-Rader |
control 3
Board 4 West Deals Both Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
N 2N; NS 2♠; NS 2♥; NS 3♣; S 1N; N 2♦; S 1♦; Par +120
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
1 NT | E | −2 | 200 | 6.00 | 0.00 | 1-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 7-Hill-Randolph | ||
3 ♦ | S | −2 | 200 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 2-Carico-Stetson vs 2-Smith-Beckert | ||
2 ♥ | N | 3 | 140 | 5.00 | 1.00 | 3-Halberg-Gain vs 4-Bender-Juarez | ||
1 NT | S | −1 | 100 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 4-McAuliffe-Mottet vs 6-Rader-Rader | ||
3 NT | N | −1 | 100 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 5-Waterman-Mendell vs 1-Sitzman-Beckert | ||
2 NT | N | −3 | 300 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 6-Ferrel-Ferrel vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw | ||
2 ♦ | S | −1 | 100 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 7-Conklin-Gunn vs 5-Soehrens-Rice |
control 4
Board 5 North Deals N-S Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EW 3N; EW 3♥; EW 4♣; EW 1♠; Par −400
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
4 ♣ | W | −1 | 50 | 6.00 | 0.00 | 1-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 7-Hill-Randolph | ||
Pass | Pass | 3.50 | 2.50 | 2-Carico-Stetson vs 2-Smith-Beckert | ||||
Pass | Pass | 3.50 | 2.50 | 3-Halberg-Gain vs 4-Bender-Juarez | ||||
2 ♣ | W | 4 | 130 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 4-McAuliffe-Mottet vs 6-Rader-Rader | ||
2 ♣ | W | 3 | 110 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 5-Waterman-Mendell vs 1-Sitzman-Beckert | ||
Pass | Pass | 3.50 | 2.50 | 6-Ferrel-Ferrel vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw | ||||
Pass | Pass | 3.50 | 2.50 | 7-Conklin-Gunn vs 5-Soehrens-Rice |
control 5
Board 6 East Deals E-W Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EW 2♥; NS 3♣; NS 1N; Par +110
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
2 ♠ | N | −1 | 50 | 3.50 | 2.50 | 1-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 7-Hill-Randolph | ||
1 ♠ | N | 1 | 80 | 6.00 | 0.00 | 2-Carico-Stetson vs 2-Smith-Beckert | ||
1 NT | S | −1 | 50 | 3.50 | 2.50 | 3-Halberg-Gain vs 4-Bender-Juarez | ||
2 NT | N | −1 | 50 | 3.50 | 2.50 | 4-McAuliffe-Mottet vs 6-Rader-Rader | ||
1 NT | S | −4 | 200 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 5-Waterman-Mendell vs 1-Sitzman-Beckert | ||
1 NT | N | −2 | 100 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 6-Ferrel-Ferrel vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw | ||
2 NT | S | −1 | 50 | 3.50 | 2.50 | 7-Conklin-Gunn vs 5-Soehrens-Rice |
control 6
Board 7 South Deals Both Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 6♣; NS 4N; NS 4♥; NS 3♠; NS 4♦; Par +1370
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
3 NT | N | 4 | 630 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 1-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 6-Rader-Rader | ||
5 ♣ | S | 7 | 640 | 4.00 | 2.00 | 2-Carico-Stetson vs 1-Sitzman-Beckert | ||
3 NT | N | 3 | 600 | 2.00 | 4.00 | 3-Halberg-Gain vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw | ||
3 ♣ | S | 7 | 190 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 4-McAuliffe-Mottet vs 5-Soehrens-Rice | ||
3 NT | S | 5 | 660 | 5.00 | 1.00 | 5-Waterman-Mendell vs 7-Hill-Randolph | ||
3 NT | N | −2 | 200 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 6-Ferrel-Ferrel vs 2-Smith-Beckert | ||
3 NT | N | 7 | 720 | 6.00 | 0.00 | 7-Conklin-Gunn vs 4-Bender-Juarez |
control 7
Board 8 West Deals None Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EW 3♠; NS 3♥; NS 1N; NS 1♦; Par −100: NS 4♥×−1
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
3 ♠ | W | −1 | 50 | 4.00 | 2.00 | 1-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 6-Rader-Rader | ||
2 ♥ | S | 4 | 170 | 6.00 | 0.00 | 2-Carico-Stetson vs 1-Sitzman-Beckert | ||
2 ♥ | S | 3 | 140 | 5.00 | 1.00 | 3-Halberg-Gain vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw | ||
2 ♥ | S | −1 | 50 | 2.00 | 4.00 | 4-McAuliffe-Mottet vs 5-Soehrens-Rice | ||
4 ♥× | S | −2 | 300 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 5-Waterman-Mendell vs 7-Hill-Randolph | ||
4 ♠ | N | −1 | 50 | 2.00 | 4.00 | 6-Ferrel-Ferrel vs 2-Smith-Beckert | ||
2 ♥ | S | −1 | 50 | 2.00 | 4.00 | 7-Conklin-Gunn vs 4-Bender-Juarez |
control 8
Board 9 North Deals E-W Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
W 4N; E 3N; W 4♦; EW 4♣; NS 2♠; NS 2♥; E 3♦; Par −500: NS 5♥×−3; NS 5♠×−3
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
2 NT | E | 4 | 180 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 1-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 6-Rader-Rader | ||
3 NT | E | 4 | 630 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 2-Carico-Stetson vs 1-Sitzman-Beckert | ||
2 NT | E | −4 | 400 | 6.00 | 0.00 | 3-Halberg-Gain vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw | ||
3 ♣ | E | 4 | 130 | 2.00 | 4.00 | 4-McAuliffe-Mottet vs 5-Soehrens-Rice | ||
3 NT | E | −1 | 100 | 4.00 | 2.00 | 5-Waterman-Mendell vs 7-Hill-Randolph | ||
3 NT | E | −1 | 100 | 4.00 | 2.00 | 6-Ferrel-Ferrel vs 2-Smith-Beckert | ||
2 NT | E | −1 | 100 | 4.00 | 2.00 | 7-Conklin-Gunn vs 4-Bender-Juarez |
control 9
Board 10 East Deals Both Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 5♦; NS 3♠; W 2♥; EW 3♣; NS 1N; E 1♥; Par +600
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
4 ♠ | N | 5 | 650 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 1-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 5-Soehrens-Rice | ||
6 ♠× | N | 6 | 1660 | 6.00 | 0.00 | 2-Carico-Stetson vs 7-Hill-Randolph | ||
6 ♦ | S | 6 | 1370 | 5.00 | 1.00 | 3-Halberg-Gain vs 2-Smith-Beckert | ||
4 ♠ | N | 6 | 680 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 4-McAuliffe-Mottet vs 4-Bender-Juarez | ||
4 ♠ | N | 6 | 680 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 5-Waterman-Mendell vs 6-Rader-Rader | ||
4 ♠ | N | 6 | 680 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 6-Ferrel-Ferrel vs 1-Sitzman-Beckert | ||
6 ♠ | N | −1 | 100 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 7-Conklin-Gunn vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw |
control 10
Board 11 South Deals None Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 2♠; EW 3♣; W 1N; NS 2♦; NS 1♥; Par −100: NS 3♦×−1; NS 3♠×−1
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
4 ♠× | S | 4 | 590 | 6.00 | 0.00 | 1-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 5-Soehrens-Rice | ||
3 ♠ | S | 3 | 140 | 4.00 | 2.00 | 2-Carico-Stetson vs 7-Hill-Randolph | ||
3 ♥ | N | 5 | 200 | 5.00 | 1.00 | 3-Halberg-Gain vs 2-Smith-Beckert | ||
3 ♣ | E | −1 | 50 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 4-McAuliffe-Mottet vs 4-Bender-Juarez | ||
4 ♥ | N | −2 | 100 | 1.50 | 4.50 | 5-Waterman-Mendell vs 6-Rader-Rader | ||
4 ♠ | N | −2 | 100 | 1.50 | 4.50 | 6-Ferrel-Ferrel vs 1-Sitzman-Beckert | ||
2 ♠ | E | 4 | 170 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 7-Conklin-Gunn vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw |
control 11
Board 12 West Deals N-S Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 4♥; NS 3N; NS 3♦; NS 2♣; EW 1♠; Par +500: EW 4♠×−3
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
2 ♥ | N | 3 | 140 | 4.17 | 1.83 | 1-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 5-Soehrens-Rice | ||
3 ♠ | W | −2 | 100 | 2.42 | 3.58 | 3-Halberg-Gain vs 2-Smith-Beckert | ||
2 ♠ | W | 2 | 110 | 1.25 | 4.75 | 4-McAuliffe-Mottet vs 4-Bender-Juarez | ||
3 ♠ | W | 3 | 140 | 0.08 | 5.92 | 5-Waterman-Mendell vs 6-Rader-Rader | ||
2 ♠ | N | 3 | 140 | 4.17 | 1.83 | 6-Ferrel-Ferrel vs 1-Sitzman-Beckert | ||
1 NT | N | 3 | 150 | 5.92 | 0.08 | 7-Conklin-Gunn vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw |
control 12
Board 13 North Deals Both Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EW 3♠; EW 3♥; EW 4♣; EW 1N; NS 1♦; Par −140
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
1 NT | E | 3 | 150 | 2.00 | 4.00 | 1-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 4-Bender-Juarez | ||
2 NT | E | 4 | 180 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 2-Carico-Stetson vs 6-Rader-Rader | ||
3 ♦ | S | −1 | 100 | 4.00 | 2.00 | 3-Halberg-Gain vs 1-Sitzman-Beckert | ||
1 NT | S | 1 | 90 | 5.00 | 1.00 | 4-McAuliffe-Mottet vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw | ||
1 NT | N | −2 | 200 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 5-Waterman-Mendell vs 5-Soehrens-Rice | ||
2 ♣ | E | 4 | 130 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 6-Ferrel-Ferrel vs 7-Hill-Randolph | ||
2 ♦ | S | 3 | 110 | 6.00 | 0.00 | 7-Conklin-Gunn vs 2-Smith-Beckert |
control 13
Board 14 East Deals None Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EW 4N; EW 5♦; NS 2♠; EW 2♥; NS 1♣; Par −430
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
5 ♦ | E | 5 | 400 | 1.50 | 4.50 | 1-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 4-Bender-Juarez | ||
5 ♦ | W | 5 | 400 | 1.50 | 4.50 | 2-Carico-Stetson vs 6-Rader-Rader | ||
5 ♦ | E | 5 | 400 | 1.50 | 4.50 | 3-Halberg-Gain vs 1-Sitzman-Beckert | ||
4 ♠ | S | −2 | 100 | 4.00 | 2.00 | 4-McAuliffe-Mottet vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw | ||
5 ♦ | E | 5 | 400 | 1.50 | 4.50 | 5-Waterman-Mendell vs 5-Soehrens-Rice | ||
6 ♦ | E | −1 | 50 | 5.00 | 1.00 | 6-Ferrel-Ferrel vs 7-Hill-Randolph | ||
4 ♠ | S | 4 | 420 | 6.00 | 0.00 | 7-Conklin-Gunn vs 2-Smith-Beckert |
control 14
Board 15 South Deals N-S Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EW 2♠; EW 2♥; EW 1N; EW 2♣; EW 1♦; Par −110
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
3 ♣ | W | 5 | 150 | 2.00 | 4.00 | 1-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 4-Bender-Juarez | ||
3 NT | W | −2 | 100 | 5.50 | 0.50 | 2-Carico-Stetson vs 6-Rader-Rader | ||
3 NT | E | −1 | 50 | 3.50 | 2.50 | 3-Halberg-Gain vs 1-Sitzman-Beckert | ||
3 NT | E | 3 | 400 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 4-McAuliffe-Mottet vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw | ||
2 ♦ | S | −3 | 300 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 5-Waterman-Mendell vs 5-Soehrens-Rice | ||
3 NT | E | −2 | 100 | 5.50 | 0.50 | 6-Ferrel-Ferrel vs 7-Hill-Randolph | ||
2 ♥ | W | −1 | 50 | 3.50 | 2.50 | 7-Conklin-Gunn vs 2-Smith-Beckert |
control 15
Board 16 West Deals E-W Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NS 6N; NS 6♦; NS 6♣; NS 1♠; EW 1♥; Par +990
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
3 ♣ | W | 4 | 130 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 1-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw | ||
5 ♦ | S | 6 | 420 | 5.00 | 1.00 | 2-Carico-Stetson vs 5-Soehrens-Rice | ||
4 ♦ | N | 7 | 190 | 3.50 | 2.50 | 3-Halberg-Gain vs 7-Hill-Randolph | ||
3 ♦ | N | 6 | 170 | 2.00 | 4.00 | 4-McAuliffe-Mottet vs 2-Smith-Beckert | ||
4 ♦ | S | 7 | 190 | 3.50 | 2.50 | 5-Waterman-Mendell vs 4-Bender-Juarez | ||
3 NT | N | −1 | 50 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 6-Ferrel-Ferrel vs 6-Rader-Rader | ||
3 NT | N | 7 | 520 | 6.00 | 0.00 | 7-Conklin-Gunn vs 1-Sitzman-Beckert |
control 16
Board 17 North Deals None Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EW 4♥; E 2N; EW 2♠; W 1N; NS 2♦; E 2♣; W 1♣; Par −420
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
5 ♦ | S | 7 | 440 | 6.00 | 0.00 | 1-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw | ||
5 ♠ | W | −3 | 150 | 5.00 | 1.00 | 2-Carico-Stetson vs 5-Soehrens-Rice | ||
4 ♥ | E | 5 | 450 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 3-Halberg-Gain vs 7-Hill-Randolph | ||
3 ♣ | S | −3 | 150 | 2.00 | 4.00 | 4-McAuliffe-Mottet vs 2-Smith-Beckert | ||
4 ♣ | S | −4 | 200 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 5-Waterman-Mendell vs 4-Bender-Juarez | ||
2 ♥ | E | 3 | 140 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 6-Ferrel-Ferrel vs 6-Rader-Rader | ||
2 ♥ | E | −2 | 100 | 4.00 | 2.00 | 7-Conklin-Gunn vs 1-Sitzman-Beckert |
control 17
Board 18 East Deals N-S Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EW 2N; EW 3♣; NS 2♦; NS 1♠; S 1♥; Par −120
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
4 ♥ | E | 4 | 420 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 1-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw | ||
2 NT | W | 4 | 180 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 2-Carico-Stetson vs 5-Soehrens-Rice | ||
5 ♣ | E | −2 | 100 | 6.00 | 0.00 | 3-Halberg-Gain vs 7-Hill-Randolph | ||
2 ♣ | E | 3 | 110 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 4-McAuliffe-Mottet vs 2-Smith-Beckert | ||
3 ♣ | E | 3 | 110 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 5-Waterman-Mendell vs 4-Bender-Juarez | ||
3 ♣ | E | 3 | 110 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 6-Ferrel-Ferrel vs 6-Rader-Rader | ||
1 ♦ | S | 2 | 90 | 5.00 | 1.00 | 7-Conklin-Gunn vs 1-Sitzman-Beckert |
control 18
Board 19 South Deals E-W Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EW 3♠; NS 2♥; EW 3♦; NS 3♣; EW 1N; Par −100: NS 4♣×−1
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
2 ♥ | S | −1 | 50 | 4.00 | 2.00 | 1-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 2-Smith-Beckert | ||
2 ♥ | S | −2 | 100 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 2-Carico-Stetson vs 4-Bender-Juarez | ||
3 ♥ | S | 3 | 140 | 5.50 | 0.50 | 3-Halberg-Gain vs 6-Rader-Rader | ||
2 ♠ | E | 3 | 140 | 1.50 | 4.50 | 4-McAuliffe-Mottet vs 1-Sitzman-Beckert | ||
3 ♥ | S | 3 | 140 | 5.50 | 0.50 | 5-Waterman-Mendell vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw | ||
2 NT | N | −4 | 200 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 6-Ferrel-Ferrel vs 5-Soehrens-Rice | ||
2 ♠ | E | 3 | 140 | 1.50 | 4.50 | 7-Conklin-Gunn vs 7-Hill-Randolph |
control 19
Board 20 West Deals Both Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EW 4♣; EW 2N; EW 2♠; EW 2♥; EW 3♦; Par −130
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
2 ♥ | W | −1 | 100 | 4.00 | 2.00 | 1-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 2-Smith-Beckert | ||
3 NT | W | −3 | 300 | 6.00 | 0.00 | 2-Carico-Stetson vs 4-Bender-Juarez | ||
2 NT | W | 2 | 120 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3-Halberg-Gain vs 6-Rader-Rader | ||
2 NT | W | 3 | 150 | 2.00 | 4.00 | 4-McAuliffe-Mottet vs 1-Sitzman-Beckert | ||
3 NT | W | 4 | 630 | 0.50 | 5.50 | 5-Waterman-Mendell vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw | ||
3 NT | E | 4 | 630 | 0.50 | 5.50 | 6-Ferrel-Ferrel vs 5-Soehrens-Rice | ||
3 NT | W | −2 | 200 | 5.00 | 1.00 | 7-Conklin-Gunn vs 7-Hill-Randolph |
control 20
Board 21 North Deals N-S Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
N 5♠; NS 4N; S 4♠; N 5♣; NS 3♥; S 4♣; EW 2♦; Par +650
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |||||
3 NT | S | −3 | 300 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 1-Koutz-Rottmayer vs 2-Smith-Beckert | ||
3 ♥ | N | −2 | 200 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 2-Carico-Stetson vs 4-Bender-Juarez | ||
4 ♠ | S | 4 | 620 | 6.00 | 0.00 | 3-Halberg-Gain vs 6-Rader-Rader | ||
4 ♣ | S | −1 | 100 | 2.50 | 3.50 | 4-McAuliffe-Mottet vs 1-Sitzman-Beckert | ||
4 ♠ | S | −1 | 100 | 2.50 | 3.50 | 5-Waterman-Mendell vs 3-Barnes-Granshaw | ||
4 ♦ | E | −2 | 100 | 4.00 | 2.00 | 6-Ferrel-Ferrel vs 5-Soehrens-Rice | ||
4 ♦ | W | −3 | 150 | 5.00 | 1.00 | 7-Conklin-Gunn vs 7-Hill-Randolph |
control 21
control 22
control 23
control 24
control 25
control 26
control 27
control 28